中英刑事偵查訊問(wèn)制度中的人權(quán)保障比較研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-07 21:14
【摘要】：人權(quán)保障問(wèn)題不僅是時(shí)下人們比較關(guān)注的社會(huì)熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,在國(guó)際社會(huì)中也是一個(gè)非常敏感的話題,它具有一定的廣泛性,涉及到的領(lǐng)域方方面面。我認(rèn)為,在一個(gè)具體領(lǐng)域中探討人權(quán)保障問(wèn)題更具有現(xiàn)實(shí)性和實(shí)用性。所謂刑事偵查訊問(wèn),是指在刑事訴訟中行使國(guó)家公權(quán)力的專門機(jī)關(guān)及其工作人員已按照法定程序就犯罪有關(guān)事實(shí)以言辭方式向犯罪嫌疑人、被告人提問(wèn),以促使他們陳述的一種訴訟行為。在我國(guó),偵查訊問(wèn)是指公安機(jī)關(guān)、國(guó)家安全機(jī)關(guān)和人民檢察院的偵查人員為查明案件的事實(shí)真相,依法對(duì)犯罪嫌疑人進(jìn)行詰問(wèn)以獲取其真實(shí)供述和辯解的偵查活動(dòng)。在我國(guó)刑事訴訟法規(guī)定的七種偵查行為中,訊問(wèn)犯罪嫌疑人是唯一的必經(jīng)程序,這就足以證明它在案件偵辦過(guò)程中的重要地位。該項(xiàng)制度是為保護(hù)人們的權(quán)利而設(shè)定的,但是由于它自身獨(dú)特的性質(zhì)和特點(diǎn),在這項(xiàng)制度實(shí)施的過(guò)程中侵犯犯罪嫌疑人的權(quán)利的問(wèn)題日益凸顯出來(lái)。偵查訊問(wèn)中的人權(quán)保障,是人權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的組成部分,屬于司法人權(quán)之列。它不是講人權(quán)和人權(quán)保障的一般意義,而是專指人權(quán)保障在偵查訊問(wèn)中的具體目標(biāo)和所涉及的范圍。本文就是試圖通過(guò)對(duì)中英兩國(guó)在刑事偵查訊問(wèn)制度和人權(quán)理念方面的比較,為我國(guó)刑事偵查訊問(wèn)中的人權(quán)保障問(wèn)題的進(jìn)步與發(fā)展提供一些可用的建議。 本論文除了引言之外,一共包括三個(gè)大的部分,具體內(nèi)容如下: 論文的第一部分,介紹了刑事偵查訊問(wèn)制度與人權(quán)保障的基本問(wèn)題,包括兩者之間的關(guān)系、偵查訊問(wèn)中人權(quán)保障的對(duì)象與內(nèi)容以及在偵查訊問(wèn)中保障人權(quán)的可能性。刑事偵查訊問(wèn)中的人權(quán)保障是將人權(quán)保障問(wèn)題放在了刑事偵查訊問(wèn)這樣一個(gè)具體的領(lǐng)域中進(jìn)行探討,人權(quán)是一個(gè)非常具有廣泛性的問(wèn)題,所以在探討具體領(lǐng)域中的人權(quán)保障問(wèn)題之前,必須明確人權(quán)與這一具體領(lǐng)域的關(guān)系,以及在這一領(lǐng)域中人權(quán)保障對(duì)象和內(nèi)容是什么,還有人權(quán)保障在這一領(lǐng)域中的可能性。這些問(wèn)題我都在論文的第一部分作了詳細(xì)的論述。 論文的第二部分,首先從中英兩國(guó)的刑事偵查訊問(wèn)制度入手,論述了兩國(guó)在制度規(guī)定上的不同以及我國(guó)在刑事偵查訊問(wèn)制度上漏洞,這為我國(guó)在以后的法律制度完善過(guò)程中鏟除這些制度漏洞奠定了基礎(chǔ)。其次以中英兩國(guó)的人權(quán)理念為切入點(diǎn),分析了兩國(guó)在人權(quán)理念上的差異。制度與人權(quán)理念上的差異都導(dǎo)致了兩國(guó)在刑事偵查訊問(wèn)活動(dòng)中人權(quán)保障狀況的不同。 論文的第三部分,根據(jù)中英兩國(guó)在制度、人權(quán)理念上的差異,再聯(lián)系我國(guó)的實(shí)際情況,為我國(guó)刑事偵查訊問(wèn)中的人權(quán)保障工作的進(jìn)步和發(fā)展提出了建議,希望我國(guó)從完善相關(guān)制度和大力開(kāi)展人權(quán)教育等方面入手,推進(jìn)我國(guó)刑事偵查訊問(wèn)中的人權(quán)保障工作的進(jìn)步。 本文以人權(quán)保障問(wèn)題為切入點(diǎn),通過(guò)對(duì)刑事偵查訊問(wèn)這樣一個(gè)具體領(lǐng)域中的人權(quán)保障問(wèn)題的剖析,希望可以為我國(guó)在刑事偵查訊問(wèn)中的人權(quán)保障問(wèn)題提供一些可用的建議。
[Abstract]:The issue of human rights protection is not only a hot social issue of concern at present, but also a very sensitive topic in the international community. It has certain extensiveness and involves various fields. It refers to a kind of lawsuit in which a special organ and its staff who exercise state power in criminal proceedings have put questions to suspects and defendants in a verbal manner in accordance with legal procedures in order to urge them to make statements.In China, investigation and interrogation refers to the investigation of public security organs, state security organs and people's procuratorates. In order to find out the truth of the case, the criminal suspect is interrogated in accordance with the law to obtain his true confession and defense. Of the seven kinds of investigation acts stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Law of China, interrogating the criminal suspect is the only necessary procedure, which is sufficient to prove its important position in the process of case investigation. The protection of human rights in investigation and interrogation is an integral part of the field of human rights and belongs to judicial human rights. It is not about human rights and human rights protection. This article attempts to provide some useful suggestions for the progress and development of human rights protection in criminal investigation and interrogation in China by comparing the criminal investigation and interrogation systems and human rights concepts between China and Britain.
In addition to the introduction, this paper consists of three major parts, as follows:
The first part of the paper introduces the basic problems of the system of criminal investigation and interrogation and the protection of human rights, including the relationship between the two, the object and content of human rights protection and the possibility of protecting human rights in the process of investigation and interrogation. Human rights is a very broad issue in such a specific field. Therefore, before we discuss the issue of human rights protection in a specific field, we must clarify the relationship between human rights and this specific field, as well as the object and content of human rights protection in this field, and the possibility of human rights protection in this field. These problems are discussed in detail in the first part of my thesis.
The second part of the thesis begins with the criminal investigation and interrogation systems in China and Britain, and then discusses the differences in the institutional provisions between the two countries and the loopholes in the criminal investigation and interrogation system in China, which lays a foundation for eliminating these loopholes in China's future legal system. This paper analyzes the differences in human rights concepts between the two countries, and the differences in systems and human rights concepts lead to the differences in the protection of human rights in criminal investigation and interrogation between the two countries.
In the third part of the thesis, according to the differences between China and Britain in the system and the concept of human rights, and connecting with the actual situation of our country, the author puts forward some suggestions for the progress and development of human rights protection in criminal investigation and interrogation in China, hoping that China will start with perfecting the relevant system and vigorously carrying out human rights education to promote criminal investigation and interrogation in China. The progress of human rights protection in China.
This article takes the human rights protection question as the breakthrough point, through to the criminal investigation interrogation such a concrete domain human rights protection question analysis, hoped can provide some usable suggestions for our country in the criminal investigation interrogation human rights protection question.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2;D956.1
本文編號(hào)：2229438
[Abstract]:The issue of human rights protection is not only a hot social issue of concern at present, but also a very sensitive topic in the international community. It has certain extensiveness and involves various fields. It refers to a kind of lawsuit in which a special organ and its staff who exercise state power in criminal proceedings have put questions to suspects and defendants in a verbal manner in accordance with legal procedures in order to urge them to make statements.In China, investigation and interrogation refers to the investigation of public security organs, state security organs and people's procuratorates. In order to find out the truth of the case, the criminal suspect is interrogated in accordance with the law to obtain his true confession and defense. Of the seven kinds of investigation acts stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Law of China, interrogating the criminal suspect is the only necessary procedure, which is sufficient to prove its important position in the process of case investigation. The protection of human rights in investigation and interrogation is an integral part of the field of human rights and belongs to judicial human rights. It is not about human rights and human rights protection. This article attempts to provide some useful suggestions for the progress and development of human rights protection in criminal investigation and interrogation in China by comparing the criminal investigation and interrogation systems and human rights concepts between China and Britain.
In addition to the introduction, this paper consists of three major parts, as follows:
The first part of the paper introduces the basic problems of the system of criminal investigation and interrogation and the protection of human rights, including the relationship between the two, the object and content of human rights protection and the possibility of protecting human rights in the process of investigation and interrogation. Human rights is a very broad issue in such a specific field. Therefore, before we discuss the issue of human rights protection in a specific field, we must clarify the relationship between human rights and this specific field, as well as the object and content of human rights protection in this field, and the possibility of human rights protection in this field. These problems are discussed in detail in the first part of my thesis.
The second part of the thesis begins with the criminal investigation and interrogation systems in China and Britain, and then discusses the differences in the institutional provisions between the two countries and the loopholes in the criminal investigation and interrogation system in China, which lays a foundation for eliminating these loopholes in China's future legal system. This paper analyzes the differences in human rights concepts between the two countries, and the differences in systems and human rights concepts lead to the differences in the protection of human rights in criminal investigation and interrogation between the two countries.
In the third part of the thesis, according to the differences between China and Britain in the system and the concept of human rights, and connecting with the actual situation of our country, the author puts forward some suggestions for the progress and development of human rights protection in criminal investigation and interrogation in China, hoping that China will start with perfecting the relevant system and vigorously carrying out human rights education to promote criminal investigation and interrogation in China. The progress of human rights protection in China.
This article takes the human rights protection question as the breakthrough point, through to the criminal investigation interrogation such a concrete domain human rights protection question analysis, hoped can provide some usable suggestions for our country in the criminal investigation interrogation human rights protection question.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2;D956.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 卞建林,郭志媛;英國(guó)對(duì)沉默權(quán)的限制[J];比較法研究;1999年02期
2 陳嵐;偵查程序結(jié)構(gòu)論[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年06期
3 龍宗智;英國(guó)對(duì)沉默權(quán)制度的改革以及給我們的啟示[J];法學(xué);2000年02期
4 張松美;中國(guó)尚不具備確立沉默權(quán)的社會(huì)條件[J];法學(xué);2001年02期
5 何燕萍;中國(guó)目前應(yīng)該確立沉默權(quán)制度──《中國(guó)尚不具備確立沉默權(quán)的社會(huì)條件》質(zhì)疑[J];法學(xué);2001年07期
6 張鵬翔;;中英偵查訊問(wèn)制度比較研究[J];中國(guó)商界(上半月);2009年09期
7 包心鑒;;以人為本、民主公正:社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值的科學(xué)內(nèi)涵[J];理論學(xué)刊;2011年01期
8 袁建平;;以人為本與憲政[J];理論探討;2010年06期
9 唐兢;石椰紅;;中英警察訊問(wèn)制度之比較[J];人權(quán);2006年01期
10 陳瑞華;超期羈押?jiǎn)栴}的法律分析[J];人民檢察;2000年09期
，本文編號(hào)：2229438
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2229438.html
教材專著
