【摘要】：因不法行為引起自殺是刑法理論和司法實(shí)踐的疑難問(wèn)題,在我國(guó)刑事司法解釋和判例中,往往會(huì)被作為犯罪的構(gòu)成、加重或從重情節(jié)處罰。我國(guó)明清例律對(duì)該問(wèn)題有著鮮明獨(dú)特的裁判立場(chǎng)。在清代司法判例的視野下,《紅樓夢(mèng)》里有代表性的四個(gè)引起自殺案例一般會(huì)得出肯定歸責(zé)的結(jié)論。但從當(dāng)今刑法理論的因果關(guān)系、責(zé)任主義和被害人責(zé)任等視角來(lái)審視,有的則得出了相反的結(jié)論。這其中的關(guān)鍵問(wèn)題是對(duì)刑法的責(zé)任主義原則的悖反。以小說(shuō)中的案例研讀刑法問(wèn)題,生動(dòng)易懂且不失深刻。當(dāng)前我國(guó)刑事司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)引起自殺行為的處罰同樣存在與刑法理論相悖反的結(jié)果歸責(zé)傾向,應(yīng)當(dāng)避免。
[Abstract]:Suicide caused by illegal acts is a difficult problem in criminal law theory and judicial practice. In our country's criminal judicial interpretation and precedents, it is often regarded as the constitution of a crime, aggravated or punished according to the serious circumstances. Four suicide cases generally lead to the conclusion of affirmative attribution of responsibility. However, from the perspective of contemporary criminal law theory, such as causality, accountability and victim responsibility, some of them come to the opposite conclusion. The key problem is the violation of the principle of criminal liability. It is easy to understand and profound. In the current criminal judicial practice of our country, the punishment for causing suicide also exists the tendency of imputation of consequences which is contrary to the criminal law theory and should be avoided.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D929

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 大谷實(shí);張凌;;企業(yè)犯罪與處罰法人[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;1988年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 章建生 吳強(qiáng) 孟凡全;案例探討[N];人民法院報(bào);2002年

，

本文編號(hào)：2216610