法倫理學(xué)：學(xué)科抑或思想
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-30 18:20
【摘要】：有關(guān)法倫理學(xué)的探討在我國大陸地區(qū)已開展近三十年,然而其研究熱度遠不及以法社會學(xué)、法經(jīng)濟學(xué)為代表的眾多邊緣法學(xué),探討的內(nèi)容也多局限于基礎(chǔ)理論話題,少有獨到的建樹。學(xué)者們想要努力實現(xiàn)的是盡快建立起學(xué)科形態(tài)的法倫理學(xué),他們從學(xué)科理論入手,生產(chǎn)了一批因缺少新穎的核心理念而難以符合人們預(yù)期的成果,這些理論成果在轉(zhuǎn)化為具有法倫理學(xué)特質(zhì)的學(xué)科內(nèi)容時不可避免地遭遇瓶頸,法倫理學(xué)似乎陷入不知該向何處去的困境。本文從“如何構(gòu)建法倫理學(xué)”的思考著手,從大陸學(xué)界的研究現(xiàn)狀、其它法域相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的理論研究和實踐出發(fā),在分析和批判的基礎(chǔ)上提出:大陸法倫理學(xué)研究困境的根源主要在于按照傳統(tǒng)學(xué)科構(gòu)建經(jīng)驗直接“創(chuàng)造”學(xué)科形態(tài)的法倫理學(xué),忽略了它得以產(chǎn)生的理論和實踐需要,造就了一門缺乏特色、難以貢獻“知識增量”的“低價值學(xué)科”。文章的標(biāo)題《法倫理學(xué):學(xué)科抑或思想》正是對構(gòu)建方式的問與答,提出法倫理學(xué)要走出困境就應(yīng)當(dāng)呼應(yīng)理論和實踐的現(xiàn)實需要,確定法倫理學(xué)獨特的核心思想,在形成系統(tǒng)化的學(xué)說后再去構(gòu)建學(xué)科,走一條“先思想,后學(xué)科”的道路。 文章的緒論部分從選題的角度對本論文選題的價值、研究目標(biāo)、創(chuàng)新點等內(nèi)容進行闡述,以向讀者展示文章具體內(nèi)容背后的思考,為全文的研究提供一個背景,幫助讀者更好地理解文章具體內(nèi)容編排和它們之間的關(guān)聯(lián)。正文部分共八章四個部分,簡略摘要如下。 第一部分是對已有研究成果的介紹和分析,對大陸法倫理學(xué)研究成果進行統(tǒng)計、分析和批判,對其它法域的法律倫理研究和實踐進行介紹并與大陸展開對比,包括第一章“中國大陸法倫理學(xué)研究現(xiàn)狀批判”和第二章“其它法域的法倫理學(xué)”。其中第一章是在對大陸研究現(xiàn)狀進行統(tǒng)計分析的基礎(chǔ)上,針對當(dāng)前學(xué)界探討得最為集中的三大話題的分析批判,對大陸法倫理學(xué)所面臨窘境進行了描繪和基本的分析;第二章則將目光轉(zhuǎn)向我國臺灣地區(qū)的法律倫理學(xué)研究和實踐,以及發(fā)展程度最高的美國法律倫理實踐,從比較法的角度對這兩個范本與大陸的研究展開對比,為大陸法倫理學(xué)的改進提供了一些借鑒。 第二部分是第一部分“破”的主調(diào)的繼續(xù)深入,并嘗試著去“立”一個全新的法倫理學(xué)構(gòu)建模式,包括第三章“法倫理學(xué)創(chuàng)生的另一條路徑”和第四章“作為一種思想的法倫理學(xué)”。其中第三章是第一、二章的繼續(xù)深入,全面地分析了大陸法倫理學(xué)研究困境背后的原因,提出創(chuàng)生的恰當(dāng)路徑是“從思想到學(xué)科”;第四章則是對第三章所“立”理論的身體力行,解釋作為一種思想的法倫理學(xué)的歷史場景、明確了法倫理學(xué)的核心思想,并通過龐德提出的五個問題以及對思潮與歷史場景互動的分析完成了法倫理學(xué)思想與西方三大法學(xué)思想的比較。 第三部分包括第五章“法倫理學(xué)研究的展開(一):從修正既有理論的角度”、第六章“法倫理學(xué)研究的展開(二):從分析社會問題的角度”和第七章“法倫理學(xué)研究的展開(三):從法律人倫理的角度”。該部分將法倫理學(xué)的核心思想放到既有理論、社會熱點問題和法律人倫理探討中去,讓核心思想的種子在以上三個領(lǐng)域中萌發(fā),是法倫理學(xué)從思想向?qū)W科過渡的第一步。 文章的第四部分是第八章“作為一門學(xué)科的法倫理學(xué)”。根據(jù)本文的基本觀點,法倫理學(xué)的學(xué)科樣態(tài)從思想樣態(tài)進化而來的,在思想樣態(tài)尚不能提供足夠的素材、沒有顯現(xiàn)出基本理路的情形下,學(xué)科樣態(tài)的法倫理學(xué)都不具備形成的條件,因此該部分的闡述實際上是對未來成熟階段的法倫理學(xué)學(xué)科的設(shè)想。其中探討了法倫理學(xué)學(xué)科存在的正當(dāng)性、學(xué)科的定義、研究對象、學(xué)科歸屬和風(fēng)格等對學(xué)科具有根本意義的話題,并提出了學(xué)科內(nèi)容體系的基本構(gòu)想。
[Abstract]:The study of legal ethics has been carried out in mainland China for nearly 30 years. However, its research enthusiasm is far less than that of many marginal jurisprudence represented by Sociology of law and economics of law. Neo-Confucianism, starting from the discipline theory, produces a number of results which are difficult to meet people's expectations because of the lack of novel core concepts. These theoretical results inevitably encounter bottlenecks when they are transformed into the content of the discipline with the characteristics of legal ethics. Legal ethics seems to fall into a predicament of not knowing where to go. On the basis of analysis and criticism, this paper puts forward that the root of the dilemma of the study of ethics of continental law lies in the construction of legal ethics which directly "creates" the form of the discipline according to the experience of traditional disciplines and neglects its production. The title of the article < Legal Ethics: Disciplines or Thoughts > is just a question and answer to the way of construction. It is proposed that legal ethics should respond to the practical needs of theory and practice to get out of the predicament and determine the unique characteristics of legal ethics. The core idea is to construct a discipline after forming a systematic theory and follow the road of "thinking first, disciplines later".
The introduction part of the article elaborates the value, research goal and innovation of the topic from the angle of topic selection, in order to show the readers the thinking behind the specific content of the article, provide a background for the full text research, and help readers better understand the specific content of the article and the relationship between them. The four part is a brief summary.
The first part is the introduction and analysis of the existing research results, the statistics, analysis and criticism of the research results of Continental Law Ethics, the introduction and comparison of the research and practice of legal ethics in other jurisdictions with the mainland, including the first chapter "Criticism of the status quo of the study of legal ethics in mainland China" and the second chapter "Falun in other jurisdictions" In the first chapter, on the basis of the statistical analysis of the current research situation in mainland China, the dilemma faced by the ethics of continental law is described and analyzed in the light of the analysis and criticism of the three most intensive topics discussed by the current academic circles. Practice, as well as the most developed legal ethics practice in the United States, compares the two models with the mainland from the perspective of comparative law, providing some reference for the improvement of continental law ethics.
The second part is the continuation of the main tone of the first part, and attempts to "establish" a new mode of legal ethics construction, including the third chapter "another path to the creation of legal ethics" and the fourth chapter "legal ethics as a thought". The third chapter is the continuation of the first and second chapters, a comprehensive analysis. The reasons behind the dilemma of the study of the ethics of civil law put forward that the proper path of creation is "from thought to discipline"; the fourth chapter is the practice of the theory "established" in the third chapter, explaining the historical scene of the ethics of law as a kind of thought, clarifying the core ideas of the ethics of law, and through Pound's five questions and the corresponding. The analysis of the interaction between the trend of thought and the historical scene has completed the comparison between the legal ethics thought and the western three legal thoughts.
The third part includes the fifth chapter, "the development of the study of legal ethics (1): from the perspective of revising the existing theory), the sixth chapter,"the development of the study of legal ethics (2): from the perspective of analyzing social problems"and the seventh chapter"the development of the study of legal ethics (3): from the perspective of legal ethics". It is the first step for the transition of legal ethics from ideology to discipline to let the seeds of core ideas germinate in the above three fields in the discussion of existing theories, social hot issues and legal ethics.
According to the basic point of view of this article, the subject pattern of legal ethics has evolved from the thought pattern, but it can not provide enough material, and does not show the basic principle, so the legal ethics of the subject pattern does not have the conditions to form. Therefore, the elaboration of this part is actually an assumption of the discipline of legal ethics in the future mature stage. It discusses the legitimacy of the existence of the discipline of legal ethics, the definition of the discipline, the object of study, the attribution and style of the discipline, and puts forward the basic conception of the content system of the discipline.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90-053
本文編號：2213910
[Abstract]:The study of legal ethics has been carried out in mainland China for nearly 30 years. However, its research enthusiasm is far less than that of many marginal jurisprudence represented by Sociology of law and economics of law. Neo-Confucianism, starting from the discipline theory, produces a number of results which are difficult to meet people's expectations because of the lack of novel core concepts. These theoretical results inevitably encounter bottlenecks when they are transformed into the content of the discipline with the characteristics of legal ethics. Legal ethics seems to fall into a predicament of not knowing where to go. On the basis of analysis and criticism, this paper puts forward that the root of the dilemma of the study of ethics of continental law lies in the construction of legal ethics which directly "creates" the form of the discipline according to the experience of traditional disciplines and neglects its production. The title of the article < Legal Ethics: Disciplines or Thoughts > is just a question and answer to the way of construction. It is proposed that legal ethics should respond to the practical needs of theory and practice to get out of the predicament and determine the unique characteristics of legal ethics. The core idea is to construct a discipline after forming a systematic theory and follow the road of "thinking first, disciplines later".
The introduction part of the article elaborates the value, research goal and innovation of the topic from the angle of topic selection, in order to show the readers the thinking behind the specific content of the article, provide a background for the full text research, and help readers better understand the specific content of the article and the relationship between them. The four part is a brief summary.
The first part is the introduction and analysis of the existing research results, the statistics, analysis and criticism of the research results of Continental Law Ethics, the introduction and comparison of the research and practice of legal ethics in other jurisdictions with the mainland, including the first chapter "Criticism of the status quo of the study of legal ethics in mainland China" and the second chapter "Falun in other jurisdictions" In the first chapter, on the basis of the statistical analysis of the current research situation in mainland China, the dilemma faced by the ethics of continental law is described and analyzed in the light of the analysis and criticism of the three most intensive topics discussed by the current academic circles. Practice, as well as the most developed legal ethics practice in the United States, compares the two models with the mainland from the perspective of comparative law, providing some reference for the improvement of continental law ethics.
The second part is the continuation of the main tone of the first part, and attempts to "establish" a new mode of legal ethics construction, including the third chapter "another path to the creation of legal ethics" and the fourth chapter "legal ethics as a thought". The third chapter is the continuation of the first and second chapters, a comprehensive analysis. The reasons behind the dilemma of the study of the ethics of civil law put forward that the proper path of creation is "from thought to discipline"; the fourth chapter is the practice of the theory "established" in the third chapter, explaining the historical scene of the ethics of law as a kind of thought, clarifying the core ideas of the ethics of law, and through Pound's five questions and the corresponding. The analysis of the interaction between the trend of thought and the historical scene has completed the comparison between the legal ethics thought and the western three legal thoughts.
The third part includes the fifth chapter, "the development of the study of legal ethics (1): from the perspective of revising the existing theory), the sixth chapter,"the development of the study of legal ethics (2): from the perspective of analyzing social problems"and the seventh chapter"the development of the study of legal ethics (3): from the perspective of legal ethics". It is the first step for the transition of legal ethics from ideology to discipline to let the seeds of core ideas germinate in the above three fields in the discussion of existing theories, social hot issues and legal ethics.
According to the basic point of view of this article, the subject pattern of legal ethics has evolved from the thought pattern, but it can not provide enough material, and does not show the basic principle, so the legal ethics of the subject pattern does not have the conditions to form. Therefore, the elaboration of this part is actually an assumption of the discipline of legal ethics in the future mature stage. It discusses the legitimacy of the existence of the discipline of legal ethics, the definition of the discipline, the object of study, the attribution and style of the discipline, and puts forward the basic conception of the content system of the discipline.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90-053
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 賀欣;;轉(zhuǎn)型中國背景下的法律與社會科學(xué)研究[J];北大法律評論;2005年02期
2 成凡;;社會科學(xué)“包裝”法學(xué)?——它的社會科學(xué)含義[J];北大法律評論;2005年02期
3 嚴(yán)存生;近現(xiàn)代西方法與道德關(guān)系之爭[J];比較法研究;2000年02期
4 胡旭晟;東方宗教法概觀——以法律倫理學(xué)和歷史的理論邏輯為視角[J];比較法研究;1997年03期
5 溫俊達;;法倫理學(xué)及其基本問題[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年13期
6 陳忠海;;論檔案立法原則的倫理精神[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;2008年03期
7 羅紅艷;;關(guān)注弱者權(quán)利:基于政府與學(xué)校法律糾紛的法律倫理思考[J];東北師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期
8 王進喜;中國律師職業(yè)道德:歷史回顧與展望[J];中國司法;2005年02期
9 王瑋;當(dāng)代中國法倫理學(xué)研究中的幾個問題——第三次“北京應(yīng)用倫理學(xué)論壇”綜述[J];道德與文明;2004年06期
10 周慧;;法律的道德審視的可能性[J];道德與文明;2007年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 羅能生;財產(chǎn)權(quán)利與倫理選擇[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2002年
2 尹偉中;偵查程序中的人權(quán)保護與倫理反思[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2003年
3 周慧;法律的道德之維[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2008年
4 繆斌;社會轉(zhuǎn)型期我國公務(wù)員職務(wù)犯罪的道德調(diào)控研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2009年
5 吳真文;法律與道德的界限[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 楊曦希;完善我國“交強險”制度的理性思考[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年
2 李靜然;論刑事訴訟倫理觀的構(gòu)建[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年
3 程敏;論法倫理學(xué)的基本問題[D];安徽師范大學(xué);2005年
4 李昕;法律倫理學(xué)視野中的民法誠信原則[D];南京理工大學(xué);2005年
5 戎魏魏;論建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)之行使[D];華南師范大學(xué);2007年
6 付振華;對中國體育社團處罰的倫理考量[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2009年
7 曹亞琦;見義勇為立法的法倫理學(xué)分析[D];湘潭大學(xué);2009年
8 胡菡子;我國事業(yè)單位社會養(yǎng)老保險立法研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年
9 劉聞敏;關(guān)于禁止近親結(jié)婚規(guī)定的法理學(xué)思考[D];安徽大學(xué);2010年
10 劉亞軍;許霆案的定罪規(guī)范分析和量刑多維考察[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年
，本文編號：2213910
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2213910.html
