發(fā)布時間：2018-08-24 09:44

【摘要】：中國古代的"罪疑惟輕"中的"罪疑"既包括由于缺乏證據(jù)而無法查明案情的罪與非罪之疑,還包括因犯罪行為或當(dāng)事人身份而引起的法律適用上的罪輕罪重之疑。對于"惟輕",自漢以來主要存在從輕、從贖、從無三種處理方式,實踐中,對于"惟輕"到底如何處理取決于對"罪疑"的理解。古人對于"罪疑惟輕"的議論不僅是討論罪疑如何處理,更體現(xiàn)了古人對于刑罰公正的美好愿望。價值層面的罪疑惟輕體現(xiàn)了寬仁、教化的意義。制度層面的罪疑惟輕被當(dāng)作議獄的宗旨,一則可以平衡當(dāng)事人雙方利益,一則可以理雪冤屈、救濟(jì)無辜。但是,因為"疑"本身難以把握,導(dǎo)致實踐中罪疑惟輕的處理結(jié)果千差萬別,無法真正實現(xiàn)刑罰公正。
[Abstract]:The "suspicion of crime" in ancient China includes not only the suspicion of crime and non-crime which can not be found out because of lack of evidence, but also the serious suspicion of misdemeanour in the application of law caused by the criminal act or the identity of the party concerned. Since the Han Dynasty, there are mainly three ways of dealing with "light". In practice, how to deal with "only light" depends on the understanding of "suspicion of crime". The ancients' discussion on "crime is light" is not only to discuss how to deal with the doubt of crime, but also to reflect the ancients' good desire for the justice of punishment. The crime of value level reflects the meaning of leniency and enlightenment. The crime in system level is regarded as the aim of discussing prison, one is to balance the interests of both parties, the other is to deal with the injustice and the innocent. However, because "doubt" itself is difficult to grasp, it leads to different results of dealing with crimes in practice, and can not really realize the justice of punishment.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)刑事法律科學(xué)研究院;
【分類號】：D929

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 吳京堂;罪疑惟輕 功疑惟重——對一起故意殺人疑案的辯護(hù)經(jīng)過[J];律師世界;2001年09期

2 趙運(yùn)鋒;云劍;;儒家法律文化與現(xiàn)代刑事法律思想[J];理論探索;2007年03期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 時延安 王曉帥（作者單位：中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院）;罪疑惟輕 實踐刑事法治的應(yīng)然選擇[N];中國紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察報;2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 吳超;論選擇認(rèn)定的本質(zhì)及司法適用[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：2200435