中國(guó)法律法典化的傳統(tǒng)、理性與形式研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-17 16:51
【摘要】：法律的法典化問(wèn)題是最近幾年比較熱門(mén)的話題，本論文試圖從中國(guó)法律法典化的傳統(tǒng)、理性和形式三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行深入研究，以歷史為線索，從中國(guó)古代成文法傳統(tǒng)形成的原因、表現(xiàn)形式及歷史意義入手，發(fā)展到鼎盛時(shí)期的封建法典，直至晚清中華法系的瓦解，開(kāi)始學(xué)習(xí)接受西方大陸法系的近代法典編纂技術(shù)，沿著這一歷史發(fā)展歷程，結(jié)合時(shí)代背景，梳理了中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律的形式變革。 以晚清修律為歷史分界點(diǎn)，中國(guó)開(kāi)始了法制近代化。近代法典有其內(nèi)在的理論依據(jù)及其完美的表現(xiàn)形式。但近代化并不等于西化，我們要立足國(guó)情，法典并不是萬(wàn)能的，它也有其本身的缺陷，所以要從我們國(guó)家自身的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化和法律傳統(tǒng)中尋找法制現(xiàn)代化的內(nèi)在基礎(chǔ)和發(fā)展動(dòng)力，把國(guó)家制定法與其他非正式法淵源結(jié)合起來(lái)，以適合我們國(guó)情的方式構(gòu)筑我們自己的法制現(xiàn)代化圖式。本論文共分四章，各章的主要內(nèi)容概括如下： 第一章主要闡述了中國(guó)古代的成文法歷史傳統(tǒng)以及西式法典對(duì)中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律形式的影響。在本章第一節(jié)中，作者考察了各個(gè)歷史朝代立法修律的活動(dòng)，并在此基礎(chǔ)上分析了法典化體例的特點(diǎn)，進(jìn)而嘗試著對(duì)法典化這種立法模式的原因進(jìn)行初步探析并簡(jiǎn)述其歷史意義：第二節(jié)分析了晚清時(shí)期近代西式法典對(duì)中國(guó)法律體系的沖擊，逐步接受先進(jìn)的法律文化，對(duì)中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行改造。 第二章是全面系統(tǒng)地分析了成文法典的內(nèi)在理論依據(jù)。分別從思想奠基、工具屬性以及權(quán)威主義三個(gè)不同側(cè)面深入分析了近代法典的特征。第一節(jié)從思想方面追溯到西方自然法學(xué)派的理論，它是法典化運(yùn)動(dòng)的價(jià)值基礎(chǔ)，也對(duì)中國(guó)的法律發(fā)展產(chǎn)生了積極的影響。第二節(jié)介紹了法典具有社會(huì)改造的工具屬性，對(duì)國(guó)家的政治、法治、經(jīng)濟(jì)都會(huì)產(chǎn)生巨大的作用。第三節(jié)轉(zhuǎn)而分析法典的權(quán)威性，詳細(xì)論述法典權(quán)威性的內(nèi)涵以及構(gòu)成權(quán)威性的條件。 第三章是論述成文法典的外在形式特征。本章共分三節(jié)。第一節(jié)分析法律體系的形式建構(gòu)，形式主義是一切現(xiàn)代法典的重要特征，第二節(jié)介紹法律解釋的原因以及法官在法律解釋中的作用，并針對(duì)目前法律解釋實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題，提出要健全法律解釋和立法監(jiān)督機(jī)制。第三節(jié)是深入分析法典運(yùn)用中“三段論”推理方式，運(yùn)用具體案例剖析大陸法系的法官在司法實(shí)踐中的推理過(guò)程和具體操作方法。 第四章是全文的最后一章，由三個(gè)部分組成。第一節(jié)論述的是全球化背景下我國(guó)立法模式的理性選擇，，在繼受移植國(guó)外法律的同時(shí)要注重本土化問(wèn)題。第二節(jié)是說(shuō)明根據(jù)本國(guó)國(guó)情，在法典化立法模式之外，還有習(xí)慣法及判例法兩種法律形式，它們可以很好地彌補(bǔ)法典化立法模式的缺陷。第三節(jié)是針對(duì)法典的固有缺陷，立足現(xiàn)實(shí)，構(gòu)建符合國(guó)情和實(shí)際的現(xiàn)代法律體系。
[Abstract]:The codification of law has been a hot topic in recent years. This paper attempts to make a thorough study on the tradition, rationality and form of legal codification in China, taking history as the clue and the reasons for the formation of the tradition of Chinese ancient statutory law. Beginning with the form of expression and historical significance, it developed to the feudal code of the heyday period, until the disintegration of the Chinese legal system in the late Qing Dynasty, and began to learn and accept the modern codification technology of the western continental law system, along this historical development course, combined with the background of the times. Combing the form change of Chinese traditional law. Taking the law revision in the late Qing Dynasty as the historical dividing point, China began to modernize the legal system. The modern code has its inherent theoretical basis and its perfect form of expression. However, modernization does not mean westernization. We should base ourselves on our national conditions. The code is not omnipotent. It also has its own shortcomings. Therefore, we should start with our country's own economy and politics. In the cultural and legal tradition, we should look for the inner foundation and development motive force of the modernization of legal system, combine the national statutory law with other informal sources of law, and construct our own schema of the modernization of legal system in a way suitable for our national conditions. This thesis is divided into four chapters. The main contents of each chapter are summarized as follows: the first chapter mainly expounds the historical tradition of the written law in ancient China and the influence of the western code on the Chinese traditional legal form. In the first section of this chapter, the author examines the activities of legislative revision of various historical dynasties, and on the basis of this, analyzes the characteristics of legalization. The second section analyzes the impact of the western code on the Chinese legal system in the late Qing Dynasty and gradually accepts the advanced legal culture. To reform the traditional legal structure of China. The second chapter is a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the internal theoretical basis of the written Code. The characteristics of modern code are analyzed from three different aspects: ideological foundation, instrumental attribute and authoritarianism. The first section traces back to the theory of western natural law school from the thought aspect, it is the value foundation of the codification movement, also has the positive influence to the legal development of China. The second section introduces that the code has the instrumental attribute of social reform, which will play a great role in the politics, rule of law and economy of the country. The third section analyzes the authority of the code in detail. The third chapter discusses the external formal characteristics of the written Code. This chapter is divided into three sections. The first section analyzes the formal construction of the legal system, formalism is an important feature of all modern codes, the second section introduces the reasons of legal interpretation and the role of judges in legal interpretation, and aims at the problems in the practice of legal interpretation. We should improve the legal interpretation and legislative supervision mechanism. The third section is to deeply analyze the reasoning mode of "syllogism" in the application of the code, and use specific cases to analyze the reasoning process and concrete operation methods of the judges in the civil law system in judicial practice. The fourth chapter is the last chapter, which consists of three parts. The first section discusses the rational choice of our country's legislative model under the background of globalization. The second section is to explain that according to the national conditions, in addition to the legislative model of codification, there are two legal forms, customary law and case law, which can make up for the defects of the legislative model of codification. The third section is aimed at the inherent defects of the code, based on the reality, the construction of a modern legal system in line with the national conditions and reality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D909.2
本文編號(hào)：2188289
[Abstract]:The codification of law has been a hot topic in recent years. This paper attempts to make a thorough study on the tradition, rationality and form of legal codification in China, taking history as the clue and the reasons for the formation of the tradition of Chinese ancient statutory law. Beginning with the form of expression and historical significance, it developed to the feudal code of the heyday period, until the disintegration of the Chinese legal system in the late Qing Dynasty, and began to learn and accept the modern codification technology of the western continental law system, along this historical development course, combined with the background of the times. Combing the form change of Chinese traditional law. Taking the law revision in the late Qing Dynasty as the historical dividing point, China began to modernize the legal system. The modern code has its inherent theoretical basis and its perfect form of expression. However, modernization does not mean westernization. We should base ourselves on our national conditions. The code is not omnipotent. It also has its own shortcomings. Therefore, we should start with our country's own economy and politics. In the cultural and legal tradition, we should look for the inner foundation and development motive force of the modernization of legal system, combine the national statutory law with other informal sources of law, and construct our own schema of the modernization of legal system in a way suitable for our national conditions. This thesis is divided into four chapters. The main contents of each chapter are summarized as follows: the first chapter mainly expounds the historical tradition of the written law in ancient China and the influence of the western code on the Chinese traditional legal form. In the first section of this chapter, the author examines the activities of legislative revision of various historical dynasties, and on the basis of this, analyzes the characteristics of legalization. The second section analyzes the impact of the western code on the Chinese legal system in the late Qing Dynasty and gradually accepts the advanced legal culture. To reform the traditional legal structure of China. The second chapter is a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the internal theoretical basis of the written Code. The characteristics of modern code are analyzed from three different aspects: ideological foundation, instrumental attribute and authoritarianism. The first section traces back to the theory of western natural law school from the thought aspect, it is the value foundation of the codification movement, also has the positive influence to the legal development of China. The second section introduces that the code has the instrumental attribute of social reform, which will play a great role in the politics, rule of law and economy of the country. The third section analyzes the authority of the code in detail. The third chapter discusses the external formal characteristics of the written Code. This chapter is divided into three sections. The first section analyzes the formal construction of the legal system, formalism is an important feature of all modern codes, the second section introduces the reasons of legal interpretation and the role of judges in legal interpretation, and aims at the problems in the practice of legal interpretation. We should improve the legal interpretation and legislative supervision mechanism. The third section is to deeply analyze the reasoning mode of "syllogism" in the application of the code, and use specific cases to analyze the reasoning process and concrete operation methods of the judges in the civil law system in judicial practice. The fourth chapter is the last chapter, which consists of three parts. The first section discusses the rational choice of our country's legislative model under the background of globalization. The second section is to explain that according to the national conditions, in addition to the legislative model of codification, there are two legal forms, customary law and case law, which can make up for the defects of the legislative model of codification. The third section is aimed at the inherent defects of the code, based on the reality, the construction of a modern legal system in line with the national conditions and reality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D909.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 江立新;洋務(wù)運(yùn)動(dòng)與晚清法律近代化[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期
2 何勤華;;法的國(guó)際化和本土化[J];長(zhǎng)白論叢;1996年05期
3 周永坤;法學(xué)家與法律現(xiàn)代化[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年04期
4 劉曉源;;法律解釋的難題——關(guān)于形式合理性與實(shí)質(zhì)正義的取舍[J];東岳論叢;2009年12期
5 劉作翔;理想的法律模式建構(gòu)之形式要件[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1995年02期
6 李禎;楊燕;;移植的法律與中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)沖突之思考[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2008年10期
7 司曉博;;法哲學(xué)視野下的程序性正義與實(shí)質(zhì)性正義[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年08期
8 董保華,鄭少華;社會(huì)法——對(duì)第三法域的探索[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期
9 崔雪麗;;法律解釋的語(yǔ)言學(xué)向度[J];河北學(xué)刊;2010年02期
10 公丕祥;清末法制改革與中國(guó)法制現(xiàn)代化[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);1994年06期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條
1 ;[N];人民法院報(bào);2011年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 劉建輝;法典化立法模式評(píng)析[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2004年
2 王建;大陸法系法典化過(guò)程中的形式理性?xún)A向[D];山東大學(xué);2006年
本文編號(hào)：2188289
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2188289.html
教材專(zhuān)著
