美國對華鋼鐵業(yè)反補貼實證分析
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-05 15:33
【摘要】：近年來,隨著中美雙邊經貿的快速發(fā)展,雙方之間的貿易爭端日益增多。美國在國內貿易保護主義的壓力下,頻繁的對中國產品采取貿易保護主義措施。從2006年的銅版紙案開始,截止2011年8月,美國對華產品進行了三十多起反補貼調查,是WTO成員中對華采取反補貼措施最多的國家。在這其中,中國鋼鐵產品遭受的損失尤為嚴重,從案件數量和金額上來說均超過半數。從2007年的環(huán)狀焊接碳素鋼管案開始,到2011年8月,美國共對中國鋼鐵產品發(fā)動了十五起反補貼調查,目前已經做出終裁的有十二起案件,其中否定性終裁案件有兩起。本文主要分析了美國對華鋼鐵業(yè)已經做出終裁的十二起案件,統(tǒng)計了美國商務部對華鋼鐵業(yè)補貼的重點調查項目,分析了美國商務部在初裁時所認定的補貼項目,找出其中雙方爭議的焦點問題,并從企業(yè)和政府兩個方面提出一系列對策。 本文由導言、正文和結語三部分構成,其中正文部分共分三章。 第一章主要是對美國對華鋼鐵業(yè)系列反補貼案進行統(tǒng)計,從發(fā)生頻率、涉案標的和調查項目三個方面進行了統(tǒng)計分析,整理出了美商務部在對華鋼鐵業(yè)反補貼時的重點調查項目,同時針對美商務部初裁認定的補貼項目進行了重點研究,以期引起國內產業(yè)的重視。 第二章主要是美國對華鋼鐵業(yè)反補貼中的實體和程序問題分析。在實體問題方面,主要從補貼的認定、美國對華產品反補貼歷程及原因、美國對華鋼鐵產品反補貼稅的計算三個方面展開;在程序問題方面,主要從反補貼調查機關、反補貼案的發(fā)起與調查、行政復審和司法復審四方面展開。 第三章主要是應對美國反補貼的對策分析。在企業(yè)方面,主要提出了積極應對美國的反補貼調查;充分利用美國國內法律,積極進行行政和司法救濟;轉變投資方式;加快鋼鐵業(yè)的整合,增強抵御風險的能力等建議。在政府方面,主要提出了調整和合理使用、配置國內的補貼政策;建立完善預警聯動機制,發(fā)揮行業(yè)協會的作用;充分利用好出口退稅政策;善于利用世貿組織爭端解決機制對美進行訴訟;適時對美產品進行反補貼制裁等建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of bilateral economic and trade between China and the United States, trade disputes between the two sides are increasing day by day. Under the pressure of domestic trade protectionism, the United States frequently takes protectionist measures against Chinese products. Since the 2006 coated Paper case, as of August 2011, the United States has conducted more than 30 countervailing investigations on Chinese products, making it the country with the most countervailing measures to China among WTO members. China's steel products have suffered particularly badly, with more than half of the cases in terms of both the number of cases and the amount of money involved. From the 2007 annular welded carbon steel pipe case, to August 2011, the United States launched 15 countervailing investigations into Chinese steel products. At present, there are 12 final cases, of which two are negative cases. This paper mainly analyzes 12 cases in which the US steel industry has already made a final decision, counts the key investigation items of the US Department of Commerce's subsidies to China's steel industry, and analyzes the subsidy items identified by the US Department of Commerce at the time of the initial adjudication. To find out the focus of dispute between the two sides, and put forward a series of countermeasures from two aspects of enterprise and government. This paper is composed of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is mainly about the statistics of the series of countervailing cases of steel and iron industry of the United States to China, which are statistically analyzed from three aspects: frequency of occurrence, target involved in the case and investigation project. The key investigation items of the US Ministry of Commerce in the countervailing of steel and iron industry to China have been sorted out. At the same time, the key research on the subsidy items identified by the US Ministry of Commerce has been carried out in order to arouse the attention of the domestic industry. The second chapter is the analysis of entity and procedure in anti-subsidy of steel industry to China. In terms of substantive issues, mainly from the recognition of subsidies, the history and reasons of US countervailing products to China, the calculation of US countervailing duties on Chinese steel products, and the procedural aspects, mainly from the countervailing investigation agencies. The initiation and investigation of countervailing cases, administrative review and judicial review are carried out. The third chapter is the countermeasure analysis of countervailing to the United States. In the aspect of enterprises, some suggestions are put forward, such as actively responding to the countervailing investigation in the United States, making full use of the domestic laws of the United States, actively carrying out administrative and judicial relief, changing the mode of investment, speeding up the integration of the steel industry and strengthening the ability to resist risks, and so on. On the government side, it mainly puts forward the adjustment and rational use, the allocation of domestic subsidy policy, the establishment and improvement of the linkage mechanism of early warning, the exertion of the role of the trade association, the full use of the export tax rebate policy; Good at using the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to litigate against the United States; timely countervailing sanctions against American products and other suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D971.2;DD912.29;D996.1;F752.7
本文編號：2166225
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of bilateral economic and trade between China and the United States, trade disputes between the two sides are increasing day by day. Under the pressure of domestic trade protectionism, the United States frequently takes protectionist measures against Chinese products. Since the 2006 coated Paper case, as of August 2011, the United States has conducted more than 30 countervailing investigations on Chinese products, making it the country with the most countervailing measures to China among WTO members. China's steel products have suffered particularly badly, with more than half of the cases in terms of both the number of cases and the amount of money involved. From the 2007 annular welded carbon steel pipe case, to August 2011, the United States launched 15 countervailing investigations into Chinese steel products. At present, there are 12 final cases, of which two are negative cases. This paper mainly analyzes 12 cases in which the US steel industry has already made a final decision, counts the key investigation items of the US Department of Commerce's subsidies to China's steel industry, and analyzes the subsidy items identified by the US Department of Commerce at the time of the initial adjudication. To find out the focus of dispute between the two sides, and put forward a series of countermeasures from two aspects of enterprise and government. This paper is composed of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is mainly about the statistics of the series of countervailing cases of steel and iron industry of the United States to China, which are statistically analyzed from three aspects: frequency of occurrence, target involved in the case and investigation project. The key investigation items of the US Ministry of Commerce in the countervailing of steel and iron industry to China have been sorted out. At the same time, the key research on the subsidy items identified by the US Ministry of Commerce has been carried out in order to arouse the attention of the domestic industry. The second chapter is the analysis of entity and procedure in anti-subsidy of steel industry to China. In terms of substantive issues, mainly from the recognition of subsidies, the history and reasons of US countervailing products to China, the calculation of US countervailing duties on Chinese steel products, and the procedural aspects, mainly from the countervailing investigation agencies. The initiation and investigation of countervailing cases, administrative review and judicial review are carried out. The third chapter is the countermeasure analysis of countervailing to the United States. In the aspect of enterprises, some suggestions are put forward, such as actively responding to the countervailing investigation in the United States, making full use of the domestic laws of the United States, actively carrying out administrative and judicial relief, changing the mode of investment, speeding up the integration of the steel industry and strengthening the ability to resist risks, and so on. On the government side, it mainly puts forward the adjustment and rational use, the allocation of domestic subsidy policy, the establishment and improvement of the linkage mechanism of early warning, the exertion of the role of the trade association, the full use of the export tax rebate policy; Good at using the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to litigate against the United States; timely countervailing sanctions against American products and other suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D971.2;DD912.29;D996.1;F752.7
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 史愛麗;;查詢工商登記檔案 維護中國企業(yè)利益[J];北京檔案;2009年10期
2 吳薇;;中小企業(yè)面臨的“雙反”困局及思考[J];對外經貿實務;2010年01期
3 李鶴林;田偉;鄺獻任;;油井管供需形勢分析與對策[J];鋼管;2010年01期
4 王寧;趙鵬;向雙娣;李建新;;對我國油井管產業(yè)發(fā)展的幾點認識[J];鋼管;2011年03期
5 唐宜紅;唐若韜;;美國對華反補貼的焦點問題與我國的對策[J];國際貿易;2010年05期
6 張劍;何海燕;;反補貼產業(yè)損害評估指標體系的構建[J];華東經濟管理;2011年01期
7 顧曉莉;;“雙反”大棒砸向油井管[J];石油石化物資采購;2010年Z1期
8 郭金剛;師國敏;;我國出口信貸的現狀分析及發(fā)展對策[J];經濟師;2008年03期
9 羅漢偉;;美鋼鐵保護引發(fā)國際公憤 中國或將卷入國際鋼鐵貿易戰(zhàn)[J];中國經濟周刊;2010年31期
10 劉海民;;簡評美國Wiley Rein律師所“中國補貼鋼鐵”報告——兼論我國鋼鐵產業(yè)的成本競爭力問題[J];冶金管理;2008年01期
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 中國社科院法學所 劉敬東;[N];經濟參考報;2010年
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 林惠玲;美國反補貼實體法律實施問題研究[D];華東政法大學;2010年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 劉慧;美國反補貼法的修改動向及中國的應對[D];中國政法大學;2011年
2 李秋華;論美國反補貼法及我國的對策[D];山東大學;2010年
，本文編號：2166225
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2166225.html
