本文選題：社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期 + 農(nóng)村�。� 參考：《西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：依法治國是構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的基本要求和重要途徑，也是維護(hù)農(nóng)村社會(huì)穩(wěn)定，大力發(fā)展農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)的重要保障。本論文立足于社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期農(nóng)村的現(xiàn)面臨的時(shí)代背景，對農(nóng)村社會(huì)糾紛的類型成因進(jìn)行了分析總結(jié)，，并尋求有效化解農(nóng)村社會(huì)糾紛的機(jī)制、方式與途徑，為社會(huì)主義新農(nóng)村建設(shè)提供重要的制度保障。本論文大體分為三個(gè)部分： 第一部分我國正處于社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期，農(nóng)村的矛盾糾紛既有傳統(tǒng)的像土地糾紛、婚姻家庭糾紛、鄰里糾紛等農(nóng)村常見的糾紛，也包括新型的農(nóng)村糾紛像隨著市場經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和農(nóng)村城市化進(jìn)程加快，日益凸顯和增多的農(nóng)村糾紛，城市化重點(diǎn)工程建設(shè)中引發(fā)的農(nóng)村社會(huì)糾紛，因環(huán)境污染問題引發(fā)的農(nóng)村社會(huì)糾紛。從法律文化的理念、農(nóng)村糾紛雙方關(guān)系親疏、農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)收入水平、糾紛的影響及公眾輿論和成本與收益的比值等多個(gè)方面探討了如何正確選擇糾紛解決方式的相關(guān)影響因素。從非訴訟糾紛解決方式符合新農(nóng)村建設(shè)要求、訴訟糾紛解決方式在廣大農(nóng)村地區(qū)應(yīng)進(jìn)一步發(fā)展兩方面充分分析了農(nóng)村糾紛解決方式多元化的必要性和可行性。要充分考慮傳統(tǒng)的非訴訟糾紛解決方式和訴訟糾紛解決方式各自的優(yōu)勢和不足，把二者很好的結(jié)合起來，使糾紛解決的各種方式都充分發(fā)揮各自的作用，只有這樣才能有效的處理農(nóng)村社會(huì)糾紛，維護(hù)農(nóng)村社會(huì)的穩(wěn)定。 第二部分主要介紹農(nóng)村各種矛盾的存在成因，解決手段的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)，從而把訴訟與非訴訟的多元糾紛解決機(jī)制產(chǎn)生的背景，產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)和必要、前提條件以及該糾紛解決機(jī)制在化解農(nóng)村多種矛盾中的優(yōu)勢和作用進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)闡述和研究。本中重點(diǎn)對法院特別是基層法庭在農(nóng)村糾紛解決中的重要性進(jìn)行了研究，因法院在整個(gè)社會(huì)矛盾化解中的不可替代性及化解矛盾的專業(yè)性和規(guī)范性使得這一組織在化解農(nóng)村各類矛盾中具有保障和指導(dǎo)作用。同時(shí)也介紹了農(nóng)村訴訟與非訴訟相銜接多元糾紛解決方式的構(gòu)建。首先解析了農(nóng)村糾紛訴訟與非訴訟解決方式的領(lǐng)域劃分與銜接點(diǎn)確定，然后分析了非訴訟糾紛解決方式中人民調(diào)解的重要意義，以及構(gòu)建多無化糾紛解決機(jī)制所必須的法治宣傳，介紹了構(gòu)建這一糾紛解決方式應(yīng)有的制度等保障。 第三部分主要介紹了對農(nóng)村轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期訴訟與非訴訟相銜接的多元糾紛解決機(jī)制在現(xiàn)階段農(nóng)村基層地區(qū)的構(gòu)建是符合政府在農(nóng)村的基本政策的，是與政府構(gòu)建和諧農(nóng)村的總基調(diào)相一致的。在農(nóng)村各種傳統(tǒng)及新型矛盾不斷涌現(xiàn)的今天，這一糾紛解決機(jī)制需要更有力的推廣和完善。既需要黨委政府的高度重視，加大投入，加強(qiáng)保障，更需要人民群眾的大力支持，自覺運(yùn)用，和不斷促進(jìn)。
[Abstract]:Ruling the country according to law is the basic requirement and important way to build a harmonious socialist society, and it is also an important guarantee for maintaining the stability of rural society and developing rural economic construction. This paper is based on the background of the rural areas in the social transition period, analyzes and summarizes the causes of the rural social disputes, and looks for the mechanism, ways and means of effectively resolving the rural social disputes. It will provide important system guarantee for the construction of new socialist countryside. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part of our country is in the period of social transformation, the contradictions and disputes in rural areas, such as traditional disputes such as land disputes, marriage and family disputes, neighborhood disputes and other common disputes in rural areas. It also includes the new type of rural disputes such as the increasingly prominent and increasing rural disputes with the development of the market economy and the accelerated process of rural urbanization, and the rural social disputes caused by the construction of the key projects of urbanization. Rural social disputes caused by environmental pollution. From the legal culture concept, the relationship between the two sides of the rural dispute, the income level of agricultural production, the influence of the dispute and the ratio of public opinion and cost to income, this paper probes into the relevant factors of how to choose the right way of dispute resolution. The necessity and feasibility of diversification of dispute resolution in rural areas are analyzed from two aspects: the non-litigation dispute settlement way conforms to the requirements of new rural construction and the litigation dispute resolution method should be further developed in the vast rural areas. It is necessary to fully consider the advantages and disadvantages of traditional non-litigation dispute resolution methods and litigation dispute resolution methods, and combine the two very well, so that all kinds of dispute resolution methods can give full play to their respective roles. Only in this way can we effectively deal with rural social disputes and maintain the stability of rural society. The second part mainly introduces the causes of the existence of various contradictions in rural areas, the advantages and disadvantages of the means of settlement, so as to bring about the background, the social basis and the necessity of the multivariate dispute resolution mechanism between litigation and non-litigation. The preconditions and the advantages and functions of the dispute resolution mechanism in resolving various contradictions in rural areas are elaborated and studied in detail. This paper focuses on the importance of courts, especially grass-roots courts, in rural dispute resolution. Due to the irreplaceable nature of the court in resolving the social contradictions and the specialization and standardization of resolving the contradictions, this organization plays a role of guarantee and guidance in resolving all kinds of contradictions in rural areas. At the same time, it also introduces the construction of the multi-party dispute settlement mode. First of all, it analyzes the division of areas and the determination of connecting points between rural dispute litigation and non-litigation settlement, and then analyzes the important significance of people's mediation in non-litigation dispute resolution. The necessary publicity of rule of law and the guarantee of constructing the system of dispute settlement are introduced. The third part mainly introduces the multivariate dispute resolution mechanism, which links litigation and non-litigation in the period of rural transformation. At the present stage, the construction of rural grass-roots areas is in line with the basic policies of the government in rural areas. It is consistent with the overall tone of the government's construction of a harmonious countryside. With the emergence of various traditional and new contradictions in rural areas, the dispute resolution mechanism needs to be popularized and improved. It is necessary to attach great importance to the Party Committee and government, to increase investment, to strengthen security, and to make full use of and constantly promote the efforts of the masses.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D422.6;D920.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 洪浩;;非訟方式:農(nóng)村民事糾紛解決的主要途徑[J];法學(xué);2006年11期

2 李長健;曹俊;王妍;;基于農(nóng)民權(quán)益保護(hù)的非訟機(jī)制[J];天水行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 秦衛(wèi)俊;蘇南農(nóng)村城市化進(jìn)程中矛盾化解的法理學(xué)思考[D];上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院;2008年

本文編號：2093835