本文選題：法律效力 + 基礎(chǔ)規(guī)范　； 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：法律效力是法律權(quán)威的重要基礎(chǔ)和根據(jù),也是法理學(xué)和法哲學(xué)研究的中心問(wèn)題。在西方法學(xué)史上對(duì)法律效力問(wèn)題作過(guò)充分研究,提出了許多獨(dú)特理論和觀點(diǎn)并因之而具有典型意義的當(dāng)屬凱爾森純粹法學(xué)的法律效力論。凱爾森從法律效力的概念、法律效力與法律實(shí)效的關(guān)系、法律效力的理由、法律效力的范圍以及法律效力的等級(jí)結(jié)構(gòu)諸方面,對(duì)法律效力問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了深入研究。他主張?jiān)诜煽茖W(xué)內(nèi)部解決法律效力問(wèn)題,把先驗(yàn)的正義、自然法理念和政治、歷史事實(shí)等因素從法學(xué)的領(lǐng)域中清除出去,保持法律科學(xué)的獨(dú)立性與科學(xué)性。并且認(rèn)為嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)姆椒ㄕ摵涂陀^性是法律科學(xué)保持自治和統(tǒng)一所必不可少的。為達(dá)到維護(hù)實(shí)在法律秩序的安定性、明確性和統(tǒng)一性的理論宗旨,凱爾森將基礎(chǔ)規(guī)范這一思維預(yù)設(shè)作為其理論體系的邏輯起點(diǎn)�；A(chǔ)規(guī)范為法律規(guī)范提供最終的效力理由,并成為整個(gè)實(shí)在法律體系合法性的根據(jù)。通過(guò)預(yù)設(shè)這一基礎(chǔ)規(guī)范,凱爾森不僅自圓其說(shuō)地闡明了法律學(xué)科的獨(dú)立性與獨(dú)特性,建立了具有原創(chuàng)性的學(xué)理思想,而且推動(dòng)了學(xué)術(shù)研究的進(jìn)一步深入。同時(shí),由于其理論的極端純粹性,從誕生以來(lái)就不斷遭到異議者的抨擊,但始終無(wú)法撼動(dòng)其作為二十世紀(jì)經(jīng)典法律理論形態(tài)的重要地位。在我國(guó)的法治初級(jí)階段,研究和借鑒凱爾森的法律效力論不僅可以為我國(guó)的法治建設(shè)提供有力的理論依據(jù)和獨(dú)特理論視角,而且對(duì)促進(jìn)我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的完善和發(fā)展具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:Legal effect is the important foundation and basis of legal authority, and also the central issue of jurisprudence and philosophy of law. In the history of western jurisprudence, the issue of legal validity has been fully studied, and many unique theories and viewpoints have been put forward, which are of typical significance to Kelsen's theory of legal effect of pure jurisprudence. From the concept of legal effect, the relationship between legal effect and legal effect, the reason of legal effect, the scope of legal effect and the hierarchical structure of legal effect, Kelsen makes an in-depth study on the issue of legal effect. He advocated solving the problem of legal effect within the legal science, removing the transcendental justice, the idea of natural law and politics, and historical facts from the field of jurisprudence, so as to maintain the independence and scientific nature of legal science. It is believed that rigorous methodology and objectivity are essential for legal science to maintain autonomy and unity. In order to maintain the stability, clarity and unity of the real legal order, Kelsen regards the presupposition of basic norms as the logical starting point of its theoretical system. Basic norms provide the ultimate validity of legal norms, and become the basis of the legitimacy of the entire legal system. By presupposing this basic norm, Kelsen not only justifies the independence and uniqueness of the legal discipline, but also establishes the original academic thought and promotes the further study of the academic research. At the same time, because of the extreme purity of its theory, it has been attacked by dissidents since its birth, but it can not shake its important position as the form of the classical legal theory in the 20th century. In the primary stage of the rule of law in our country, studying and drawing lessons from the theory of legal effect of Kelsen can not only provide a powerful theoretical basis and a unique theoretical perspective for the construction of the rule of law in our country. Moreover, it has important practical guiding significance to promote the perfection and development of the rule of law construction in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 于語(yǔ)和,韓良,丁廣宇;凱爾森的純粹法學(xué)理論與中國(guó)的法制建設(shè)[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年03期

2 梁曉儉;試論凱爾森基礎(chǔ)規(guī)范理論的合理性[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2063593