本文選題：新康德主義 + 價(jià)值相對(duì)主義　； 參考：《海南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：人類選擇了法律,便崇尚法律,但是人類法律文明的進(jìn)步絕非是一蹴而就的,而是在眾多法哲學(xué)家的思想碰撞下逐漸地產(chǎn)生出一個(gè)又一個(gè)偉大的理論,從而推動(dòng)了法律的進(jìn)步和完善。從康德的法律價(jià)值絕對(duì)主義到新康德主義價(jià)值體系的誕生再到拉德布魯赫價(jià)值相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)的最終構(gòu)建,我們可以看出,在學(xué)術(shù)的領(lǐng)域之中,不存在絕對(duì)的“真理”,隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展和進(jìn)步,人們總會(huì)不斷地發(fā)現(xiàn)新的方法、提出新的角度,于是原有的觀點(diǎn)不斷被挑戰(zhàn)、被完善、被推翻。而新觀點(diǎn)被廣泛接受前,往往會(huì)被看作是荒誕不經(jīng)的,要遭到嚴(yán)厲質(zhì)疑甚至無(wú)情打擊,歷盡千番曲折后才能慢慢被認(rèn)同。價(jià)值相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)的形成也同樣不可避免地經(jīng)歷了這翻曲折,從它的發(fā)展路徑過(guò)程中,我們可以領(lǐng)悟到,唯有在學(xué)術(shù)領(lǐng)域大力提倡百家爭(zhēng)鳴,對(duì)各家之見持海納百川的氣度,同時(shí)積極大膽地質(zhì)疑,這才是真正理性的態(tài)度,才有利于學(xué)術(shù)的繁榮,而這些正是我國(guó)法學(xué)乃至整個(gè)學(xué)術(shù)界所缺乏的學(xué)術(shù)品質(zhì)。因此,研究?jī)r(jià)值相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)的發(fā)展路徑,不僅具有一定的理論意義,而且還具有極大的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文主要分為三個(gè)部分： 第一部分主要論述了法律價(jià)值的絕對(duì)主義到相對(duì)主義的演變過(guò)程。從康德法哲學(xué)思想入手,著重對(duì)康德法哲學(xué)思想所體現(xiàn)的絕對(duì)性和超經(jīng)驗(yàn)的普遍性、必然性進(jìn)行論述,進(jìn)而列舉了幾位具有代表性的哲學(xué)家對(duì)康德這種超現(xiàn)實(shí)的哲學(xué)思想所進(jìn)行的批判和質(zhì)疑,而后到新康德主義的誕生,作為新康德主義西南學(xué)派的理論巨匠——拉德布魯赫,他在康德二元方法論以及新康德主義價(jià)值論的基礎(chǔ)之上開創(chuàng)了價(jià)值相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)體系,就此,實(shí)現(xiàn)了法律價(jià)值的絕對(duì)主義向相對(duì)主義的飛躍。 第二部分在承接第一部分的基礎(chǔ)上,主要闡述了價(jià)值相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)的演變?cè)蚣捌淙〉玫某删��？v觀歷史發(fā)展的背景以及西方學(xué)術(shù)界的發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì),筆者從必然因素和偶然因素兩方面來(lái)說(shuō)明價(jià)值相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)的演變?cè)?然后詳細(xì)論述了拉德布魯赫在其價(jià)值相對(duì)主義哲學(xué)上所取得的令人嘆服的偉大成就。 第三部分是本文的升華部分,通過(guò)思考價(jià)值相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)發(fā)展路徑的整個(gè)過(guò)程,反思我國(guó)當(dāng)代法學(xué)以及整個(gè)學(xué)術(shù)大環(huán)境的發(fā)展?fàn)顟B(tài),從中吸取塑造中國(guó)當(dāng)代法學(xué)獨(dú)立、包容的品格以及改善不良學(xué)術(shù)氛圍的有益之處。
[Abstract]:When human beings choose law, they advocate law, but the progress of human legal civilization is not achieved overnight, but gradually produces one great theory after another under the collision of many legal philosophers. Thus promoting the progress and improvement of the law. From Kant's legal value absolutism to the birth of Neo-Kant 's value system and to the final construction of Radbroch's value relativism, we can see that there is no absolute "truth" in the academic field. With the continuous development and progress of social economy, people always find new methods and put forward new angles, so the original views are constantly challenged, perfected and overturned. Before the new ideas are widely accepted, they are often regarded as absurd. They have to be severely questioned or even ruthlessly attacked before they can be accepted slowly after many ups and downs. The formation of the value relativism philosophy of law also inevitably experienced the twists and turns, from its development path process, we can understand that only in the academic field vigorously advocate a hundred schools of thought contend, and hold the tolerance of accepting all kinds of views from the sea. At the same time, it is the real rational attitude, which is beneficial to the academic prosperity, and these are the academic qualities that our law and even the whole academic circles lack. Therefore, the research on the development path of value relativism legal philosophy has not only theoretical significance, but also great practical significance. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part mainly discusses the evolution process from absolutism to relativism. From the view of Kant's philosophy of law, this paper discusses emphatically the absoluteness and the universality and inevitability of his philosophy of law. Then it enumerates several representative philosophers who criticize and question Kant's surreal philosophical thought, and then to the birth of Neo-Kantianism, as a theoretical giant of Neo-Kantianism Southwest School-Radbroch. On the basis of Kant's dual methodology and Neo-Kant 's value theory of value, he created the value relativism legal philosophy system, and thus realized the leap from absolutism of legal value to relativism. On the basis of the first part, the second part mainly expounds the evolution of the value relativism philosophy of law and its achievements. Looking at the background of historical development and the development trend of western academic circles, the author explains the evolution reason of value relativism legal philosophy from two aspects: inevitable factor and accidental factor. Then it discusses in detail the great achievements of Radbroch in his philosophy of value relativism. The third part is the sublimation part of this paper, through thinking about the whole process of the development path of the value relativism legal philosophy, reflecting the development state of our country's contemporary jurisprudence and the whole academic environment, and absorbing and shaping the independence of the Chinese contemporary law. Tolerance and the benefits of improving the academic atmosphere.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D90-05

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 葉茂;拉德布魯赫相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)思想研究[D];西南大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2063806