本文選題：法官 + 法庭調(diào)解�。� 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2011年博士論文

【摘要】：法庭語(yǔ)言研究應(yīng)成為法學(xué)研究中的一個(gè)重要組成部分。法庭調(diào)解制度的合法性基礎(chǔ)的獲得,需要考察法官在整個(gè)調(diào)解過(guò)程中的語(yǔ)言運(yùn)用情況。法官作為調(diào)解過(guò)程的行為人,依照哈貝馬斯的相關(guān)理論,其合法性要通過(guò)法官語(yǔ)言的客觀真實(shí)性、主觀真誠(chéng)性以及社會(huì)規(guī)范正確性獲得。法庭調(diào)解制度的三大基本原則、共識(shí)達(dá)成前提下的言語(yǔ)有效性與調(diào)解立法的商談是統(tǒng)一的。 本文共分六章,另有引言和結(jié)論各一部分。引言部分指出,司法過(guò)程的事實(shí)性與合法性之間所存在的張力要求我們更多地考察法官的行為合法性,尤其是法庭調(diào)解中法官的語(yǔ)言行為合法性。第一章是法庭調(diào)解語(yǔ)言及其合法性,介紹本文的選題理由、研究現(xiàn)狀、研究?jī)?nèi)容和方法以及本章小結(jié)。法庭調(diào)解所具有的各種優(yōu)勢(shì)以及當(dāng)前我國(guó)建設(shè)和諧社會(huì),都要求我們關(guān)注法庭調(diào)解制度。同時(shí),法律與語(yǔ)言所具有的緊密關(guān)系與研究現(xiàn)狀表明,法庭調(diào)解語(yǔ)言研究具有重要性和緊迫性。法官在調(diào)解過(guò)程中的語(yǔ)言運(yùn)用情況及其合法性,直接決定了整個(gè)法庭調(diào)解制度的合法性。 第二章是關(guān)于法官調(diào)解語(yǔ)言的客觀真實(shí)性研究,介紹客觀真實(shí)性研究的相關(guān)理論,分析法官語(yǔ)言運(yùn)用的真實(shí)性策略,包括概念澄清、預(yù)設(shè)澄清、事實(shí)確認(rèn)、模糊策略和“實(shí)話”策略,通過(guò)研究法官的“打比方”來(lái)考察其在調(diào)解過(guò)程中的態(tài)度與立場(chǎng)。研究表明,調(diào)解中的法官運(yùn)用了不同的真實(shí)性策略來(lái)達(dá)成協(xié)議,但是對(duì)于該類策略的使用,首先要滿足自己言語(yǔ)行為的真實(shí)性,同時(shí)不應(yīng)該用自己對(duì)事實(shí)的判斷來(lái)取代當(dāng)事人的看法。 第三章是關(guān)于法官調(diào)解語(yǔ)言的主觀真誠(chéng)性研究,介紹主觀真誠(chéng)性研究的相關(guān)理論,分析法官語(yǔ)言運(yùn)用的真誠(chéng)性策略,包括“態(tài)度”策略、“同情”策略、“服務(wù)”策略、“禮貌”策略、“面子”策略以及“題外話”策略,通過(guò)研究“背對(duì)背”調(diào)解、話題控制和話題轉(zhuǎn)移三個(gè)方面來(lái)考察法官調(diào)解的真誠(chéng)度。研究表明,法官經(jīng)常試圖表達(dá)自己對(duì)當(dāng)事人的真誠(chéng)態(tài)度,但是實(shí)際調(diào)解結(jié)果卻往往產(chǎn)生了對(duì)一方當(dāng)事人的偏袒,真誠(chéng)、禮貌與溫馨的背后要保證對(duì)當(dāng)事人的中立客觀態(tài)度。 第四章是關(guān)于法官調(diào)解語(yǔ)言的規(guī)范正確性研究,介紹規(guī)范正確性研究的相關(guān)理論,通過(guò)分析法官調(diào)解的開(kāi)始階段模式和整體模式,考察法官調(diào)解過(guò)程的規(guī)范性建構(gòu),法官在調(diào)解中可能會(huì)錯(cuò)誤判斷調(diào)解的可能性,而且以審判者角色來(lái)代替調(diào)解者的角色。法官在調(diào)解過(guò)程中經(jīng)�！扒么颉碑�(dāng)事人的現(xiàn)實(shí)告訴我們,“法官就是法官”、“法官自己評(píng)判”在調(diào)解過(guò)程中經(jīng)常出現(xiàn),并未完全實(shí)現(xiàn)調(diào)解過(guò)程的合法性。 第五章考察言語(yǔ)有效性與法庭調(diào)解立法的統(tǒng)一問(wèn)題,言語(yǔ)作為交往行動(dòng)的溝通媒介,其有效性從本質(zhì)上是與共識(shí)達(dá)成、調(diào)解制度的三大基本原則以及調(diào)解立法的三個(gè)層面統(tǒng)一的。法庭調(diào)解語(yǔ)言要獲得合法性,需要作為調(diào)解中間人的法官幫助當(dāng)事人雙方達(dá)成共識(shí),在現(xiàn)有調(diào)解制度的原則框架下合法運(yùn)用語(yǔ)言,從而為通過(guò)商談共識(shí)論基礎(chǔ)上的立法來(lái)保障人民主權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。 第六章考察法庭調(diào)解語(yǔ)言立法的可能理由與建議。調(diào)解的三原則都最終落腳到法官的具體調(diào)解過(guò)程之中,調(diào)解過(guò)程又落腳到法官的言語(yǔ)行為之中,因此法官要首先遵守這三大原則,并將之?dāng)U大解釋與使用范圍,從而對(duì)法官的言語(yǔ)行為加以立法。 結(jié)論部分總結(jié)了前文的核心內(nèi)容,即法官作為法庭調(diào)解制度的行為主體,通過(guò)客觀真實(shí)語(yǔ)言的運(yùn)用、主觀真誠(chéng)語(yǔ)言的運(yùn)用以及社會(huì)規(guī)范正確語(yǔ)言的運(yùn)用,以法庭調(diào)解參與者的身份,幫助當(dāng)事人在法庭調(diào)解制度三大原則的基礎(chǔ)上實(shí)現(xiàn)調(diào)解,并獲得法庭調(diào)解語(yǔ)言的合法性,為法庭調(diào)解立法提供了實(shí)踐的基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:The study of the language of the court should be an important part of the legal research. The acquisition of the legitimacy of the court mediation system needs to examine the use of the language in the whole process of mediation. As the actor of the mediation process, the legitimacy of the judge, according to Habermas's theory, is to pass the objective truth of the judge's language. Sex, subjective sincerity and the correctness of social norms are obtained. The three basic principles of the court mediation system are unified under the premise of consensus on the validity of speech and the negotiation of the mediation of the legislation.
This article is divided into six chapters, and the introduction and conclusion each part. The introduction points out that the tension between the fact and the legitimacy of the judicial process requires us to examine the juridical behavior of the judge more, especially the legality of the judge in the court mediation. The first chapter is the court mediation language and its legality, and introduces this article. The reasons for the topic, the research status, the research content and method and the summary of this chapter. The various advantages of the court mediation and the current construction of a harmonious society in our country all require us to pay attention to the court mediation system. At the same time, the close relationship between the law and the language and the research status show that the study of the court mediation language is of great importance and urgency. In the process of mediation, the language usage and legitimacy of judges directly determine the legality of the whole court mediation system.
The second chapter is about the objective truthfulness of the judge's mediation language. It introduces the relevant theories of the objective reality research and analyzes the reality strategy of the use of the judge's language, including the concept clarification, the presupposition clarification, the fact confirmation, the fuzzy strategy and the "truth" strategy, and the study of the state of the mediation process through the study of the "analogy" of the law officer. The study shows that the judges in the mediation use different truthfulness strategies to reach agreement, but the use of this kind of strategy should first meet the authenticity of their own speech acts and should not replace the views of the parties with their own judgment of the facts.
The third chapter is the study of the subjective sincerity of the judge's mediation language. It introduces the relevant theories of the study of the subjective sincerity and analyzes the sincerity strategy of the use of the judge's language, including the "attitude" strategy, the "sympathy" strategy, the "service" strategy, the "politeness" strategy, the "face" strategy and the "question" strategy, through the study of "back to back". Three aspects of mediation, topic control and topic transfer are used to investigate the sincerity of the judge's mediation. The study shows that the judge often tries to express his sincere attitude towards the parties, but the actual mediation results often produce a partial, sincere, courteous and warm heart to the parties' neutral and objective attitude.
The fourth chapter is about the study of the normative correctness of the judge's mediation language and the related theory of the normative correctness of the study. Through the analysis of the initial stage mode and the whole model of the judge mediation, the normative construction of the judge's mediation process is examined. The judge may misjudge the possibility of mediation in the mediation, and take the role of the judge instead. The role of the mediator. In the process of mediation, the judge often "knocks" the reality of the parties to tell us, "judge is a judge", "judge himself judge" in the process of mediation often appear, did not fully realize the legitimacy of the mediation process.
The fifth chapter examines the unification of the validity of speech and the mediation of court mediation. As a communication medium of communication action, the validity of speech is in essence the agreement with the consensus, the three basic principles of the mediation system and the three levels of the mediation legislation. The court mediation language needs to be legalized and needs to be used as a judge to mediate the intermediary. To help the parties to reach a consensus and to use the language legally under the framework of the existing mediation system, so as to guarantee the realization of the people's sovereignty by negotiating the consensus based legislation.
The sixth chapter examines the possible reasons and suggestions of the court mediation language legislation. The three principles of mediation eventually fall into the process of the judge's specific mediation, and the mediation process falls to the judge's speech act. Therefore, the judge should first abide by these three principles and expand the interpretation and use of the judge, so as to add to the judge's speech act. By legislation.
The conclusion part summarizes the core content of the previous article, that is, the judge as the subject of the court mediation system, through the use of objective real language, the use of subjective and sincere language and the use of the correct language of social norms, to mediate the identity of the participants in court, and to help the parties to mediate on the basis of the three principles of the court mediation system. And obtains the legitimacy of the court mediation language, which provides a practical basis for the court mediation legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D916.2;D90-055

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 柯賢兵;中國(guó)法庭調(diào)解話語(yǔ)博弈研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

2 蔣婷;仲裁員調(diào)解話語(yǔ)的多重人際意義研究[D];西南大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2026735