本文選題：《刑部現(xiàn)行則例》 + 修頒時(shí)間��； 參考：《社會科學(xué)輯刊》2017年03期

【摘要】：清代官方文獻(xiàn)對康熙朝《刑部現(xiàn)行則例》的完成和頒布時(shí)間記載并不清晰,甚至存在頗多差謬,康熙十九年四月癸酉日的這則記載應(yīng)是誤記,康熙朝《刑部現(xiàn)行則例》的奉旨頒布日期應(yīng)該是康熙十九年四月二十七日。沈家本點(diǎn)校的傳本內(nèi)容也有錯(cuò)誤之處,應(yīng)根據(jù)"上諭"等史料推斷其準(zhǔn)確內(nèi)容;《刑部現(xiàn)行則例》的修訂具有其自身的特色,如立法技術(shù)概括性不強(qiáng)、行政指令色彩極濃、保留了比較鮮明的滿洲特色或邊域文化特征等,這些特征反映了康熙朝法例的行文習(xí)慣與民族情結(jié)。
[Abstract]:The official documents of the Qing Dynasty did not clearly record the completion and promulgation of the current rules of punishment of the Kangxi Dynasty, and there were even many errors. This record of April and Sebacu Day of Kangxi should be a mistake. The date of promulgation of the current Code of Criminal Law of the Kangxi Dynasty should be April 27, 1999. There are also errors in the content of the biography of Shen Jiaben School, which should be inferred from historical materials such as the "Shang qu". The revision of the current rules of Criminal Affairs has its own characteristics, such as the lack of generality of legislative techniques and the extremely strong color of administrative instructions. The characteristics of Manchuria or frontier culture reflect the writing habits and national complex of Kangxi Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 清華大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：清華大學(xué)自主科研項(xiàng)目(2014Z04082)
【分類號】：D929

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鄭秦;康熙《現(xiàn)行則例》：從判例法到法典法的回歸[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1995年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 劉長居（河北）;中國古代法律史話[N];人民代表報(bào);2001年

，

本文編號：2024894