發(fā)布時間：2018-06-16 02:19

  本文選題：宋刑統(tǒng) + 唐律疏議��； 參考：《南京師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為中國古代法典的代表作,《唐律疏議》有著相當成熟的立法技術(shù),它是完整保存至今的最早的一部法典,在學(xué)術(shù)界倍受重視�！端涡探y(tǒng)》作為一部上承隋唐,下啟明清的法典,也具有相當?shù)牡匚�。大多�?shù)學(xué)者在將兩者進行比較之后,得出了“翻版”之說,即認為《宋刑統(tǒng)》是《唐律疏議》的簡單翻版。但實際上,要正確得出兩者關(guān)系,必須從形式和內(nèi)容的繼承和發(fā)展兩個方面進行比較。 從形式上來看,《宋刑統(tǒng)》在大布局上保持了《唐律疏議》篇、卷、條的總體結(jié)構(gòu),條文也是繼續(xù)采用律文、注文和疏文的層次。在各個篇目的關(guān)系上,《名例律》依舊是全法典的總則部分,其它各篇處于分則的地位。并且,“十惡”制度也統(tǒng)領(lǐng)著各篇目的罪名,此為繼承的部分。此外,《宋刑統(tǒng)》又將各卷分為若干門,刪去了“篇首疏議”,加入了敕令格式,新增了起請條,總匯了“余條準此”,并且調(diào)動了條文的分布,此為發(fā)展部分。 從內(nèi)容上來看,《宋刑統(tǒng)》繼承了《唐律疏議》的主要原則和制度：禮法結(jié)合、五刑、十惡、同居相隱,這些制度和原則,都是封建社會的性質(zhì)必然要求具備的。在繼承這些制度的基礎(chǔ)上,《宋刑統(tǒng)》又根據(jù)當朝的社會政治經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展情況,以敕令的形式,新增了一系列的原則和制度,如酌定量刑原則、嚴懲賊盜原則、折杖刑制度。此外,《宋刑統(tǒng)》還發(fā)展了物權(quán)制度、債權(quán)制度和訴訟制度,為日后法典制度的完善作了重要的貢獻。 應(yīng)該說,《宋刑統(tǒng)》對《唐律疏議》的繼承,是在封建社會這個大前提下的有所損益的繼承,而這些損益的部分,也是宋朝立法者根據(jù)時代的發(fā)展所作出的調(diào)整,有鮮明的時代特色,為宋律開啟明清法律作了鋪墊。
[Abstract]:As the representative work of the ancient Chinese code, the "Tang Law" has quite mature legislative technology, it is the earliest code which has been completely preserved up to now, and has received much attention in academic circles. "Song Dynasty Criminal system" is a code of law that inherits Sui and Tang dynasties, and enlightens the Ming and Qing dynasties. Also has the considerable position. After comparing the two, most scholars come to the theory of "reprint", that is to say, it is a simple reprint of Tang Law. But in fact, in order to get the relationship correctly, we must compare the inheritance and development of form and content. From the formal point of view, the whole structure of the article, the volume and the article, has been maintained in the great layout of the Song Dynasty, and the articles also continue to adopt the levels of law, annotation and thinning. In the relation of each title, the law of name is still the general part of the whole code, and the other articles are in the position of special rule. Moreover, the "Ten evils" system is also dominated by the charge of various titles, which is part of inheritance. In addition, the "Song penalty system" divides each volume into several doors, deletes "the first part of the article," adds the form of the royal decree, adds the starting rule, brings together the "remaining articles to this effect," and mobilizes the distribution of the articles, which is the development part. From the content point of view, the Song Criminal system inherits the main principles and systems of the Tang Law: the combination of etiquette and law, five punishments, ten evils, cohabitation. These systems and principles are all necessary requirements of the nature of feudal society. On the basis of inheriting these systems, according to the social, political and economic development of the Song Dynasty, a series of principles and systems were added in the form of royal decrees, such as the principle of discretionary sentencing, the principle of severely punishing thieves and thefts, and the system of commuting sticks. In addition, the system of real right, the system of creditor's rights and the system of litigation have also been developed, which has made an important contribution to the perfection of the system of codes in the future. It should be said that the inheritance of the Song Dynasty to the Tang Law is a succession of gains and losses under the premise of feudal society, and the part of these gains and losses is also the adjustment made by the legislators of the Song Dynasty according to the development of the times. There are distinct characteristics of the times, for the Song Dynasty to open the Ming and Qing laws as a cushion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D929

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 滋賀秀三;中國法文化的考察——以訴訟的形態(tài)為素材[J];比較法研究;1988年03期

2 丹尼斯·С·特威切特,張中秋,賀衛(wèi)方;初唐法律論[J];比較法研究;1990年01期

3 王立民;略論《唐律疏議》中“疏議”的作用[J];西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1987年03期

4 何勤華;論宋代中國古代法學(xué)的成熟及其貢獻[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期

5 潘德深;宋律的編纂及其特點和作用[J];福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1987年01期

6 李玉生;;唐代法律體系研究[J];法學(xué)家;2004年05期

7 王立民;;中國古代律中條標演進之論綱——以唐律、宋刑統(tǒng)、大明律和大清律例為例[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年01期

8 陳戍國;《宋刑統(tǒng)》其書與宋代禮法[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年02期

9 郭東旭;《宋刑統(tǒng)》的制定及其變化[J];河北學(xué)刊;1991年04期

10 李俊;《宋刑統(tǒng)》的變化及法史料價值探析[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;1998年05期

，

本文編號：2024775