本文選題：海洋漁業(yè)資源 + 韓國海洋漁業(yè)資源法��； 參考：《中國海洋大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：中韓兩國作為傳統(tǒng)漁業(yè)國家，十分重視對海洋漁業(yè)資源的開發(fā)，由于兩國政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)體制及歷史發(fā)展等多方面存在差異，兩國針對海洋漁業(yè)資源的立法也各不相同。近年來，韓國通過不斷修法，使其海洋漁業(yè)資源方面的立法逐漸成熟。然而，目前我國學(xué)者從法律層面針對韓國漁業(yè)資源法的研究成果卻相對較少，尤其是近五年來，韓國陸續(xù)對相關(guān)法律進(jìn)行了極其頻繁的修訂，目前國內(nèi)的研究成果已經(jīng)很難反映韓國海洋漁業(yè)資源的立法現(xiàn)狀。為此，本文通過比較研究的方法，對韓國目前海洋漁業(yè)資源的立法進(jìn)行梳理和分析，通過對比總結(jié)其中的先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)為我國所借鑒，由此提出完善我國海洋漁業(yè)資源法律的建議。 本文除前言和結(jié)語外，共分為三個(gè)部分。第一部分從兩國實(shí)際出發(fā)，，介紹目前兩國海洋漁業(yè)的發(fā)展概況。 第二部分作為本文的重點(diǎn)，為下文的建議的提出提供了依據(jù)。首先，我國在海洋漁業(yè)資源方面的立法主要是《漁業(yè)法》，而韓國則專門制定《水產(chǎn)資源管理法》，同時(shí)，韓國的漁業(yè)屬于水產(chǎn)業(yè)范疇，因而制定《水產(chǎn)業(yè)法》調(diào)整漁業(yè)活動，為明確本文海洋漁業(yè)資源的定義，有必要理清漁業(yè)、水產(chǎn)業(yè)等與本文相關(guān)的名詞的含義。其次，兩國在海洋漁業(yè)資源方面的法律體系截然不同，我國主要確立了以《漁業(yè)法》為主的漁業(yè)法律體系，而韓國則在水產(chǎn)業(yè)法律之外專門確立了水產(chǎn)資源管理法律體系，由不同的法律分別針對漁業(yè)的“產(chǎn)業(yè)”和“資源”進(jìn)行調(diào)整—這也正是韓國海洋漁業(yè)資源立法的一個(gè)重要特點(diǎn)；兩國所確立的法律制度也存在諸多差異，通過分析兩國海洋漁業(yè)資源法律制度和所采取的措施，為下文對韓國海洋漁業(yè)資源法律的特點(diǎn)—相對于我國，進(jìn)行總結(jié)提供了依據(jù)。由于兩國還存在著特殊的地緣政治問題，因而從法律層面對兩國在專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)漁業(yè)資源的開采問題進(jìn)行分析，為加強(qiáng)我國專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)的漁業(yè)管理提出建議也是本文的目的之一。 第三部分根據(jù)第二章對兩國海洋漁業(yè)資源法律的研究和對比，提出完善我國海洋漁業(yè)資源的立法建議，并針對專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)漁業(yè)糾紛問題，提出了相應(yīng)的解決措施。 我國漁業(yè)立法起步較晚，所建立的法律體系中尚存在許多亟待完善的地方，而通過分析，韓國海洋漁業(yè)資源方面的立法中，的確有許多方法值得我們學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒，筆者希望通過本文的寫作，所提出的完善我國立法的建議，能夠?yàn)槲覈鴿O業(yè)法的完善和漁業(yè)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展貢獻(xiàn)微薄之力。
[Abstract]:As a traditional fishing country, China and Korea attach great importance to the exploitation of marine fishery resources. Due to the differences in politics, economic system and historical development between the two countries, the legislation on marine fishery resources is different between the two countries. In recent years, South Korea has made its marine fishery resources legislation mature through continuous revision of the law. However, at present, there are relatively few researches on Korean fishery resources law from the legal level, especially in the past five years, Korea has carried on the extremely frequent revision to the related laws one after another. At present, the domestic research results have been difficult to reflect the current legislative status of Korean marine fishery resources. Therefore, through the comparative research method, this paper combs and analyzes the current legislation of South Korea's marine fishery resources, and draws lessons from the advanced legislative experience of Korea by comparing and summing up the advanced legislation experience. Therefore, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the law of marine fishery resources in China. In addition to the preface and conclusion, this article is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the development of marine fishery in the two countries. The second part, as the focus of this paper, provides the basis for the following suggestions. First of all, our country's legislation on marine fishery resources is mainly the Fisheries Law, while South Korea specifically formulates the Fisheries Resources Management Law. At the same time, the Korean fishery belongs to the category of aquaculture, so it formulates the Fisheries Act to adjust fishery activities. In order to clarify the definition of marine fishery resources in this paper, it is necessary to clarify the meaning of the terms related to this article, such as fishery and aquaculture. Secondly, the legal systems of the two countries in marine fishery resources are very different. China has mainly established a fishery legal system based on the Fisheries Law, while South Korea has established a special legal system for the management of aquatic resources in addition to the aquatic industry law. The adjustment of the "industry" and "resources" of fisheries by different laws is an important feature of Korea's legislation on marine fishery resources, and there are also many differences in the legal systems established by the two countries. By analyzing the legal system of marine fishery resources and the measures taken by the two countries, this paper provides a basis for summarizing the characteristics of Korea's marine fishery resources laws compared with China. As there are also special geopolitical problems in the two countries, the legal aspects of the exploitation of fishery resources in the exclusive economic zone between the two countries are analyzed. It is also one of the purposes of this paper to put forward suggestions to strengthen fishery management in China's exclusive economic zone. In the third part, according to the research and comparison of the two countries' marine fishery resources laws in the second chapter, the author puts forward the legislative suggestions to perfect the marine fishery resources in China, and puts forward the corresponding solutions to the fishery disputes in the exclusive economic zone. The fishery legislation of our country starts relatively late, and there are still many places in the legal system that need to be perfected. However, through the analysis, there are many methods in the legislation of Korea's marine fishery resources, which are worthy of our study and reference. The author hopes that, through the writing of this paper, the suggestions of perfecting our country's legislation can contribute to the perfection of our country's fisheries law and the sustainable development of fishery.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D931.26;D922.4;F326.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田其云;;海洋漁業(yè)資源保護(hù)規(guī)程初探[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年04期

2 田其云;關(guān)于海洋資源法義務(wù)本位的思考——以權(quán)力、權(quán)利和義務(wù)為視角[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2005年03期

3 賈曉輝;董躍;陳奕彤;;淺析UNCLOS對海洋生物資源保護(hù)法律體系的發(fā)展[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2008年03期

4 焦桂英;孫麗;劉洪濱;;韓國海洋漁業(yè)管理的啟示[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2008年12期

5 郭文路,黃碩琳;總可捕量制度不同實(shí)施方式的比較分析[J];海洋湖沼通報(bào);2001年04期

6 綦振奕;趙志宏;于志新;;當(dāng)前我國海洋捕撈業(yè)面臨的主要問題及可持續(xù)發(fā)展對策探討[J];齊魯漁業(yè);2006年07期

7 賈東明,郝作成;日本、韓國漁業(yè)權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)及其主要內(nèi)容[J];中國水產(chǎn);2002年12期

8 李延森;邱秀蘭;;韓國漁業(yè)增殖放流的發(fā)展與措施[J];中國水產(chǎn);2008年08期

9 張耀光,王艷;韓國海洋資源開發(fā)的現(xiàn)狀、特征及今后展望[J];世界地理研究;2000年03期

10 唐建業(yè),黃碩琳;漁業(yè)配額權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)的制度分析[J];上海水產(chǎn)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 白洋;漁業(yè)配額法律制度研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2011年

2 田其云;海洋生態(tài)法體系研究[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2006年

3 譚柏平;我國海洋資源保護(hù)法律制度研究[D];中國人民大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 梅宏;可持續(xù)發(fā)展觀對海法的啟示與推進(jìn)[D];福州大學(xué);2005年

2 宇文青;海水養(yǎng)殖的法律規(guī)制[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2009年

3 佟岳男;淺析沿海國對專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)漁業(yè)資源的專屬權(quán)利[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：2021414