本文選題：傳統(tǒng)法治資源 + 現(xiàn)代法治資源��； 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)法治資源與法治現(xiàn)代化這一論題可謂是經(jīng)久不衰，只要一國(guó)進(jìn)行本國(guó)法律的更新與發(fā)展，則必然會(huì)面如何進(jìn)行本國(guó)法治現(xiàn)代化的問(wèn)題。我國(guó)作為后現(xiàn)代化的國(guó)家，為保障經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化與社會(huì)等各方面的發(fā)展能有良好的秩序，尤其是十七大將“依法治國(guó)”的精神納入我國(guó)的憲法之后，在“法治憲法”的指引下，我們對(duì)于法治社會(huì)的建設(shè)更加是刻不容緩的。在進(jìn)行法治現(xiàn)代化的過(guò)程中所必須采用的手段之中，我們往往比較傾向于利用法律移植的手段來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)法治的更新。與此同時(shí)，在我們進(jìn)行法律移植的過(guò)程中，不得不去面對(duì)法的共性與個(gè)性的矛盾處理問(wèn)題——傳統(tǒng)法治資源與法治現(xiàn)代化之間的矛盾處理。令人遺憾的是，翻閱我國(guó)的諸多論文，不論是期刊雜志還是學(xué)術(shù)書籍，大都只著眼于法制現(xiàn)代化，即只是看到了西方的形式法制的繁榮，著眼點(diǎn)只在于理論上的法制，希望通過(guò)法制的更新來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)的法治現(xiàn)代化。然這種沒(méi)有突出強(qiáng)調(diào)法治的現(xiàn)代化精神的片面化的觀點(diǎn)，非但會(huì)使我們研究的方向迷失，更會(huì)對(duì)我國(guó)的法治現(xiàn)代化形成理論上的阻礙。我們的法治建設(shè)不僅僅要放在制度層面，應(yīng)該注重的是對(duì)實(shí)質(zhì)法治的精神理論等深層次的探究而絕不可以僅對(duì)形式法治進(jìn)行觀賞臨摹。本文基于此目的，分別對(duì)傳統(tǒng)法治資源與法治的現(xiàn)代化的內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行了界定，，并對(duì)二者之間的矛盾產(chǎn)生的原因、對(duì)立的表現(xiàn)以及后果進(jìn)行了闡述，并通過(guò)論述傳統(tǒng)法治資源與法治現(xiàn)代化之間矛盾解決的具體步驟來(lái)提出將其糅合的具體方法。并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出了新的法治概念——法治創(chuàng)新。強(qiáng)調(diào)只有通過(guò)結(jié)合本國(guó)的具體國(guó)情，在法治繼承與法治移植的基礎(chǔ)上依靠本國(guó)的法治力量來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)自己獨(dú)特法治的途徑才是解決二者之間矛盾的立足點(diǎn)，也只有法治創(chuàng)新才更符合我國(guó)目前法治現(xiàn)代化的精神需求，也才更符合我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)法治、政治法治與文化法治的時(shí)代性的要求。只有強(qiáng)調(diào)法治的現(xiàn)代化，我們的法治才能與時(shí)俱進(jìn)，從而實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)的法治水平飛速的質(zhì)變。最后，希望以此理論可以豐富我國(guó)的法治現(xiàn)代化理論，并希望為我國(guó)的法治現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)添磚加瓦。
[Abstract]:The traditional rule of law resources and the modernization of the rule of law can be described as enduring. As long as a country carries out the renewal and development of its own laws, it will inevitably meet the question of how to modernize its own rule of law. As a post-modern country, in order to ensure good order in the development of economy, politics, culture and society, especially after the 17th National Congress brought the spirit of "governing the country according to law" into the Constitution of our country, Under the guidance of the Constitution of the Rule of Law, it is urgent for us to build a society ruled by law. In the process of modernization of the rule of law, we tend to use the means of law transplantation to realize the renewal of the rule of law in our country. At the same time, in the course of our legal transplantation, we have to deal with the contradiction between the commonness and individuality of law-the contradiction between the traditional legal resources and the modernization of the rule of law. It is regrettable that most of the papers in our country, whether periodicals, magazines or academic books, are focused on the modernization of the legal system, that is, they only see the prosperity of the formal legal system in the West, and the focus is only on the legal system in theory. It is hoped that the modernization of the rule of law will be realized through the renewal of the legal system. However, the one-sided view which does not emphasize the modernization spirit of the rule of law will not only lead to the loss of the direction of our research, but also form a theoretical obstacle to the modernization of the rule of law in our country. Our construction of the rule of law should not only be placed in the system level, should pay attention to the essence of the spiritual theory of the rule of law and other deep-seated exploration, but not just the form of the rule of law can be viewed and copied. Based on this purpose, this paper defines the connotation of the traditional legal resources and the modernization of the rule of law, and expounds the causes, manifestations and consequences of the contradiction between the two. Through discussing the concrete steps to resolve the contradiction between the traditional legal resources and the modernization of the rule of law, the paper puts forward the concrete method of blending them. And on this basis, put forward a new concept of rule of law-rule of law innovation. Emphasizing that the only way to achieve their own unique rule of law on the basis of the inheritance of the rule of law and the transplantation of the rule of law on the basis of their own specific national conditions is to achieve their own unique approach to the rule of law, which is the foothold for resolving the contradiction between the two, Only the innovation of the rule of law is more in line with the spiritual needs of the modernization of the rule of law at present in our country, and also more in line with the requirements of the times of the rule of law in economy, politics and culture. Only by emphasizing the modernization of the rule of law, our rule of law can keep pace with the times and realize the rapid qualitative change of the level of our country's rule of law. Finally, it is hoped that this theory can enrich the modernization theory of our country's rule of law and contribute to the modernization of our country's rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇力;這里沒(méi)有不動(dòng)產(chǎn) 法律移植問(wèn)題的理論梳理[J];法律適用;2005年08期

2 陳弘毅;;對(duì)古代法家思想傳統(tǒng)的現(xiàn)代反思[J];法制現(xiàn)代化研究;2002年00期

3 勞東燕;也談本土資源與法律多元——對(duì)本土資源論的一些思考[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

4 于沛霖,王海燕;關(guān)于法律移植的內(nèi)涵及形式的學(xué)理思考[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

5 楊淑s

本文編號(hào)：2021568