本文選題：法治 + 形式法治　； 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：法治是一個(gè)十分重要的，但卻在法學(xué)發(fā)展歷史上眾說(shuō)紛紜的基本概念，在分析法治時(shí)，可以將法治分為形式法治與實(shí)質(zhì)法治兩個(gè)方面，形式法治注重法治的形式主義和工具性意義，認(rèn)為法治必須凸顯其外在的規(guī)則性，重視法律的經(jīng)驗(yàn)性、實(shí)證性。形式法治表現(xiàn)為法律對(duì)社會(huì)的統(tǒng)治，而非人的任意性統(tǒng)治，從實(shí)證的角度上表明法治是一種“規(guī)則之治”，只要法律得到嚴(yán)格的實(shí)施，就是法治。所謂的“惡法亦法”就是形式法治的一種極端表達(dá)。實(shí)質(zhì)法治則著眼于法的倫理性內(nèi)容及法的價(jià)值追求，它認(rèn)為社會(huì)所需要的法治必為良法之治，絕非惡法，因此，法治的建設(shè)不能僅僅符合相關(guān)的法律形式要件，而且要使法律制度可以有效地制約權(quán)力和保障權(quán)利。它立足于社會(huì)的宏觀理想角度上，來(lái)確證“良法之治”才是真正的法治。所謂的“惡法非法”就是實(shí)質(zhì)法治的一種具體說(shuō)法。形式法治與實(shí)質(zhì)法治既有區(qū)別又有聯(lián)系，是對(duì)立統(tǒng)一的關(guān)系。具體表現(xiàn)在：一方面，法治需要法律以穩(wěn)定、明確的法條加以支持，據(jù)此來(lái)組織和安排人們的日常生活；另一方面，法治又需要法律在調(diào)整人們生活的同時(shí)，具有一定的價(jià)值性與理想追求，以此來(lái)適應(yīng)社會(huì)中不斷變化的進(jìn)步觀念。 本論文由引言和五部分正文構(gòu)成。第一部分，主要對(duì)法治概念的展開(kāi)歷史考察，對(duì)古今中外各個(gè)時(shí)期的學(xué)者關(guān)于法治概念的界定進(jìn)行比較。其次通過(guò)法治與其他相關(guān)概念的邏輯關(guān)系比較分析，提出本文的關(guān)于法治的定義。第二部分，主要對(duì)形式法治概念及特征進(jìn)行分析。對(duì)形式法治的概念進(jìn)行闡述，進(jìn)一步分析形式法治的特征。第三部分，主要對(duì)實(shí)質(zhì)法治理論進(jìn)行分析。從實(shí)質(zhì)法治的概念入手，進(jìn)一步分析實(shí)質(zhì)法治的主要特征。第四部分，主要研究形式法治與實(shí)質(zhì)法治的關(guān)系，從區(qū)別與聯(lián)系入手，進(jìn)而得出形式法治與實(shí)質(zhì)法治是辯證統(tǒng)一的關(guān)系。實(shí)質(zhì)法治決定形式法治，形式法治制約著實(shí)質(zhì)法治。第五部分，，主要論述形式法治與實(shí)質(zhì)法治的辯證統(tǒng)一的關(guān)系對(duì)我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的啟示。
[Abstract]:The rule of law is a very important basic concept in the history of the development of law. In the analysis of the rule of law, the rule of law can be divided into two aspects: formal rule of law and substantive rule of law. The formal rule of law emphasizes the formalism and instrumental significance of the rule of law, and holds that the rule of law must highlight its external regularity, and attach importance to the empirical and empirical nature of the law. The formal rule of law is the rule of law over society, but not the arbitrary rule of man. From the perspective of empirical evidence, it shows that the rule of law is a kind of "rule of law", as long as the law is strictly implemented, it is the rule of law. The so-called draconian law is an extreme expression of formal rule of law. The essence of the rule of law is focused on the ethical content of the law and the pursuit of the value of the law. It holds that the rule of law that the society needs must be the governance of good law, not draconian law. Therefore, the construction of the rule of law cannot only conform to the relevant elements of the form of law. And to make the legal system can effectively restrict power and protect rights. It is based on the macro ideal of society to confirm that the rule of law is the true rule of law. The so-called "draconian law illegal" is a concrete statement of the substantive rule of law. The formal rule of law and the substantive rule of law are both different and related, and are the unity of opposites. On the one hand, the rule of law needs to be supported by a stable and clear law to organize and organize people's daily lives; on the other hand, the rule of law requires the law to adjust people's lives at the same time. With certain value and ideal pursuit, to adapt to the changing concept of progress in society. This paper is composed of introduction and five parts of text. In the first part, the author makes a historical investigation of the concept of rule of law, and compares the definitions of the concept of rule of law between Chinese and foreign scholars. Secondly, the definition of the rule of law is put forward through the comparative analysis of the logical relationship between the rule of law and other related concepts. The second part, mainly carries on the analysis to the form rule of law concept and the characteristic. The concept of formal rule of law is expounded, and the characteristics of formal rule of law are further analyzed. The third part, mainly carries on the analysis to the substantial rule of law theory. Starting with the concept of substantive rule of law, this paper further analyzes the main characteristics of substantive rule of law. The fourth part mainly studies the relationship between the formal rule of law and the substantive rule of law, starting with the distinction and connection, and then comes to the conclusion that the formal rule of law and the substantive rule of law are dialectical and unified. The substantive rule of law determines the formal rule of law, and the formal rule of law restricts the substantive rule of law. The fifth part mainly discusses the relationship between formal rule of law and substantive rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 秦強(qiáng);制度法治與觀念法治——論法治的結(jié)構(gòu)及其意義[J];廣東青年干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

2 喻義東;;從形式法治走向?qū)嵸|(zhì)法治——對(duì)我國(guó)民族和諧的法律基礎(chǔ)的考量[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2007年02期

3 張波;論當(dāng)代中國(guó)法治價(jià)值目標(biāo)的定位和選擇[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年01期

4 劉斌;;中國(guó)當(dāng)代法治文化的研究范疇[J];中國(guó)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

5 王乃圣;;民主政治:社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的制度基礎(chǔ)和保障[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2006年10期

6 桑玉成;;和諧社會(huì)的政治基礎(chǔ)[J];上海教育;2006年Z2期

7 王峰峰,郭慶珠;從形式法治走向?qū)嵸|(zhì)法治:我國(guó)法治轉(zhuǎn)型現(xiàn)實(shí)課題的法理解析[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2005年03期

8 周智;;對(duì)權(quán)力運(yùn)行的制約和監(jiān)督存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策分析[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2006年06期

9 黃衛(wèi)平;謝振才;;構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì):全面完善黨執(zhí)政的政治基礎(chǔ)[J];深圳大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

10 董文芳;;構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)面臨的政治困境及其克服探討[J];學(xué)習(xí)與探索;2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 吳丹梅;法治的文化解析[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2003年

2 劉雪松;公民文化與法治秩序[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2005年

3 鄭淑芬;近代中國(guó)人治、法治的沖突與嬗變[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

4 王守貴;論當(dāng)代中國(guó)的法治精神[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 唐宇光;當(dāng)代西方法律理性的嬗變及啟示[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2003年

2 李紀(jì)峰;論社會(huì)主義法治的實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)制[D];鄭州大學(xué);2002年

本文編號(hào)：2019353