團隊生產(chǎn)理論:公司社會責(zé)任的理論基礎(chǔ)考辯
發(fā)布時間:2018-05-28 00:22
本文選題:團隊生產(chǎn)理論 + 公司社會責(zé)任。 參考:《政法論叢》2017年02期
【摘要】:團隊生產(chǎn)理論是法律經(jīng)濟學(xué)在公司法領(lǐng)域的進一步應(yīng)用。與契約聯(lián)結(jié)理論不同,團隊生產(chǎn)理論強調(diào)雇員對公司專屬性資產(chǎn)的投資。這一理論在一定程度上挑戰(zhàn)了股東至上主義,把雇員放在與股東更為平等的地位上來討論。這一理論在提出后受到股東至上論和董事至上論的雙重批評。從整個公司法理論的視角來看,團隊生產(chǎn)理論與董事至上論都屬于過程理論,而過程理論被看作是與許可理論、契約主義相并列的理論流派。在這三大理論中,契約主義與公司社會責(zé)任內(nèi)涵之間的沖突性較為明顯。許可理論可以為強制性的公司社會責(zé)任提供支撐,同時團隊生產(chǎn)理論也可以為公司社會責(zé)任提供理論支撐。然而,團隊生產(chǎn)理論過多關(guān)注團隊內(nèi)部以及生產(chǎn)過程。因此,要為公司社會責(zé)任尋找更為堅實的理論基礎(chǔ),需要把許可理論與團隊生產(chǎn)理論結(jié)合起來,并填充公司自身與國家之間的中間社群地帶——行業(yè)和社區(qū),以形成更為完整且多元互動的公司社群主義。
[Abstract]:The theory of team production is the further application of law and economics in the field of company law. Different from the contract linking theory, the team production theory emphasizes the employee's investment in the company's specific assets. This theory challenges shareholder supremacy to some extent, putting employees on a more equal footing with shareholders. After this theory was put forward, it was criticized by shareholder supremacy theory and director supremacy theory. From the perspective of the whole company law theory, both the theory of team production and the theory of directors' supremacy belong to the process theory, while the process theory is regarded as a school of theory parallel to the licensing theory and contractualism. In these three theories, the conflict between contractualism and corporate social responsibility is obvious. Licensing theory can provide support for mandatory corporate social responsibility, while team production theory can also provide theoretical support for corporate social responsibility. However, the theory of team production pays too much attention to both the internal team and the production process. Therefore, to find a more solid theoretical basis for corporate social responsibility, we need to combine licensing theory with team production theory and fill the middle ground between the company itself and the country-industry and community. In order to form a more complete and multi-interactive corporate communitarianism.
【作者單位】: 上海交通大學(xué)凱原法學(xué)院;華東政法大學(xué)政治學(xué)研究院;
【基金】:國家社科基金重點項目“全面推進依法治國與國家治理現(xiàn)代化研究”(14AZD133) 上海市社科規(guī)劃重大項目“企業(yè)社會責(zé)任立法研究”(2015DFXOO1) 博士后基金一等資助項目“構(gòu)建企業(yè)社會責(zé)任的硬法與軟法治理機制研究”(2016M600307) 華東政法大學(xué)政治學(xué)研究院“華與羅世界文明與比較政治研究項目”的階段性研究成果
【分類號】:D90-059
,
本文編號:1944435
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1944435.html