本文選題：主流學(xué)說 + 法社會學(xué)　； 參考：《原生態(tài)民族文化學(xué)刊》2017年01期

【摘要】：正法律之基礎(chǔ)在社會,國家法律繞不開社會習(xí)慣,這似乎是眾所周知的常識,也是長期以來我國主流學(xué)說之基本堅持。但在"法學(xué)圈"內(nèi)部,那些從事習(xí)慣、習(xí)慣法、民間法,進而研究法人類學(xué)、法社會學(xué)的學(xué)者,不過是些邊緣人物;他們的學(xué)術(shù)產(chǎn)品,對法學(xué)而言,也屬于所謂"小眾"之列。例如一份對目下吾國法學(xué)院的調(diào)侃性評論中,在提及某著名大學(xué)某教授的習(xí)慣法研究時,直呼其"沉浸于小眾的民族習(xí)慣法"�？梢�,在"正宗"的法律人心目中,這樣的
[Abstract]:The foundation of positive law lies in society, and the national law cannot break away from social habits. This seems to be a well-known common sense, and it is also the basic adherence to the mainstream doctrine of our country for a long time. But within the "legal circle," scholars engaged in custom, customary law, folk law, and legal anthropology and sociology of law are only marginal figures, and their academic products are also among the so-called "minority groups" for law. For example, in a ridiculing comment on the law school of our country, when referring to a professor's customary law research in a famous university, he called him "the minority national customary law". It can be seen that in the eyes of the "authentic" legal person, such a
【作者單位】： 中南大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D920.4

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 賀衛(wèi)方;;關(guān)于中國法學(xué)家的國際影響問題[J];外國法制史研究;2003年00期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 賀衛(wèi)方;;關(guān)于中國法學(xué)家的國際影響問題[A];全國外國法制史研究會學(xué)術(shù)叢書——20世紀外國民商法的變革[C];2003年

，

本文編號：1917269