本文選題：DMCA + 接觸控制技術(shù)措施　； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：為落實(shí)世界知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)組織版權(quán)條約和世界知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)組織表演和錄音制品條約的要求,應(yīng)對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)時(shí)代版權(quán)保護(hù)的難題,美國(guó)數(shù)字千年版權(quán)法(Digital Millennium Copyright Act,以下簡(jiǎn)稱“DMCA”)一般性地禁止規(guī)避技術(shù)保護(hù)措施。同時(shí)為平衡版權(quán)人和公眾的利益,數(shù)字千年版權(quán)法確定了相應(yīng)的永久例外并授權(quán)美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)圖書館每三年通過(guò)行政立法的方式確定臨時(shí)例外。按照版權(quán)法的規(guī)定,美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)圖書館自2000年開始每三年確定臨時(shí)例外的具體類型,截止到2017年,總共進(jìn)行了六次行政立法確定例外。2015最新的立法確定了10種臨時(shí)例外,分別是:視頻、電子書、視頻游戲、移動(dòng)設(shè)備越獄、智能電視越獄、移動(dòng)設(shè)備解鎖、3D打印、車輛維修、軟件安全研究以及醫(yī)療設(shè)備。美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)圖書館通過(guò)限定規(guī)避的主體、目的,以及可以規(guī)避的技術(shù)措施,對(duì)臨時(shí)例外的范圍進(jìn)行限定。DMCA1201條規(guī)定國(guó)會(huì)圖書館確定例外時(shí)必須考量幾大因素:作品的可獲取性,禁止規(guī)避對(duì)批評(píng)、評(píng)論、新聞報(bào)道、教學(xué)和學(xué)術(shù)研究的影響,規(guī)避技術(shù)措施給作品價(jià)值造成的影響以及其他應(yīng)當(dāng)考慮的因素;現(xiàn)實(shí)中,美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)圖書館還經(jīng)�？紤]禁止規(guī)避技術(shù)措施對(duì)合理使用的影響。美國(guó)版權(quán)法將法律對(duì)規(guī)避行為的普遍禁止、法律規(guī)定的一般例外和行政立法臨時(shí)例外三者結(jié)合起來(lái),構(gòu)造了美國(guó)版權(quán)法禁止規(guī)避技術(shù)措施的制度框架。該制度框架將規(guī)則主義和因素主義立法模式結(jié)合起來(lái),很好的兼顧了法律的穩(wěn)定性和靈活性,細(xì)致準(zhǔn)確地實(shí)現(xiàn)了版權(quán)人與公眾的利益平衡。美國(guó)版權(quán)法技術(shù)措施臨時(shí)例外制度體現(xiàn)了規(guī)則主義與因素主義的結(jié)合,對(duì)公眾的利益進(jìn)行了類型化的認(rèn)定,確立了豐富的臨時(shí)例外體系,其做法值得借鑒。
[Abstract]:In order to implement the requirements of the copyright treaties of the World intellectual property Organization and the treaties on performances and sound recordings of the World intellectual property Organization, and to deal with the problems of copyright protection in the era of the Internet, Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) generally prohibits circumvention of technical protection measures. In order to balance the interests of copyright owners and the public, the Digital Millennium copyright Act establishes the corresponding permanent exceptions and authorizes the Library of Congress to determine the provisional exceptions every three years by way of administrative legislation. In accordance with copyright law, the Library of Congress has been determining the specific types of provisional exceptions every three years since 2000, and by 2017, six executive legislations have been made to determine exceptions. The latest legislation in 2015 has established 10 temporary exceptions. They are: video, e-books, video games, mobile jailbreak, smart TV jailbreak, mobile device unlock 3D printing, vehicle maintenance, software security research, and medical devices. The Library of Congress limits the scope of temporary exceptions by limiting the subject, purpose, and technical measures that can be circumvented. Article 1201 states that the Library of Congress must consider several factors when determining exceptions: the availability of works. It is prohibited to circumvent the influence of criticism, commentary, news reports, teaching and academic research, the impact of technical measures on the value of the work, and other factors that should be taken into account; in reality, The Library of Congress also regularly considers the impact of a ban on circumvention on rational use. The copyright law of the United States combines the general prohibition of circumvention, the general exception provided by the law and the temporary exception of the administrative legislation, and constructs the institutional framework of the prohibition of technical measures in the copyright law of the United States. This system framework combines the legislative model of rulesism and factorism, which takes into account the stability and flexibility of the law, and realizes the balance between copyright owner and public interests carefully and accurately. The system of temporary exception of technical measures in American copyright law embodies the combination of rulemism and factorism, determines the interest of the public by type, and establishes a rich system of temporary exceptions, which is worthy of reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD913

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 2012—2013中國(guó)數(shù)字出版產(chǎn)業(yè)年度報(bào)告課題組;郝振省;魏玉山;張立;王飚;毛文思;李廣宇;李熙;郝園園;李游;湯雪梅;楊濤;;中國(guó)數(shù)字出版產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的規(guī)模、態(tài)勢(shì)及趨勢(shì)分析[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2013年07期

2 姚鶴徽;;評(píng)美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)圖書館的DVD技術(shù)措施例外條款——兼論我國(guó)著作權(quán)法例外條款的完善[J];圖書館建設(shè);2012年02期

3 王遷;;版權(quán)法保護(hù)技術(shù)措施的正當(dāng)性[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1774423