本文選題：心理測(cè)試技術(shù)　切入點(diǎn)：認(rèn)知綜合檢測(cè)編題方法　出處：《甘肅政法學(xué)院》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：縱觀心理測(cè)試技術(shù)(測(cè)謊)的發(fā)展歷程,編題理論與方法始終伴隨著該項(xiàng)技術(shù)的發(fā)展而發(fā)展,并是該項(xiàng)技術(shù)整個(gè)理論方法體系中非常重要的一個(gè)部分。國(guó)外編題理論與方法主要以美國(guó)的發(fā)展方向?yàn)閷?dǎo)向,在編題的原理、依據(jù)、原則、模式等方面繼承了傳統(tǒng)的測(cè)謊理論與方法,題目編制以欺騙性檢驗(yàn)為主,旨在檢測(cè)被測(cè)人有無(wú)說(shuō)謊。中國(guó)心理測(cè)試技術(shù)編題理論與方法以認(rèn)知綜合檢測(cè)法為代表,由武伯欣等人于上世紀(jì)九十年代中葉借鑒國(guó)外編題方法,結(jié)合中國(guó)國(guó)情自主研創(chuàng)而成,旨在檢測(cè)被測(cè)人有無(wú)涉案違法、犯罪心理痕跡。其經(jīng)過武伯欣近二十年、近一千五百起各類疑難案件的實(shí)測(cè)檢驗(yàn),證明具有很高的準(zhǔn)確性和科學(xué)性。 本文從歷史唯物主義的角度出發(fā),從心理學(xué)發(fā)展的歷史沿革中尋找心理測(cè)試技術(shù)及其編題理論與方法發(fā)展的規(guī)律和方向,在對(duì)中美心理測(cè)試技術(shù)及其編題方法的歷史背景進(jìn)行深入研究、了解和比較的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)中美心理測(cè)試技術(shù)編題理論與方法從原理、依據(jù)、檢測(cè)目標(biāo)以及信度與效度等角度進(jìn)行全面系統(tǒng)的研究和比較,剖析美國(guó)準(zhǔn)繩問題測(cè)試編題方法和犯罪情景測(cè)試編題方法中存在的錯(cuò)誤和不足,論證認(rèn)知綜合檢測(cè)編題方法的優(yōu)勢(shì)和科學(xué)性,為有關(guān)人士辨識(shí)美國(guó)測(cè)試方法提供理論依據(jù),以糾正“美式”測(cè)謊傳入中國(guó)后所造成的危害,為心理測(cè)試技術(shù)在中國(guó)的健康科學(xué)發(fā)展盡一點(diǎn)微薄之力。
[Abstract]:Throughout the development of psychological testing technology (lie detection), the theory and method of compiling questions has always been accompanied by the development of the technology. And it is a very important part of the whole theory and method system of this technology. The theories and methods of compiling questions abroad are mainly guided by the development direction of the United States. The model inherits the traditional lie detection theory and method, and the problem is compiled mainly by deceptive test, aiming to detect whether the subjects are lying or not. The theory and method of Chinese psychological test technique is represented by the cognitive comprehensive test method. Created by Wu Boxin and others in the middle of the 1990s using foreign methods for reference and combining with China's national conditions, the purpose of the study is to detect whether there are any psychological traces of crimes and crimes committed by the subjects involved. After nearly 20 years, Wu Boxin has been involved in the study. The test of nearly 1500 difficult cases proves that it is very accurate and scientific. From the perspective of historical materialism, this paper looks for the law and direction of the development of psychological testing technology and the theory and method of compiling questions from the historical evolution of psychology. On the basis of deeply studying, understanding and comparing the historical background of Chinese and American psychological test technology and its compiling method, the theory and method of Chinese and American psychological test technique are analyzed from the principle, basis, This paper makes a comprehensive and systematic study and comparison of the detection target, reliability and validity, and analyzes the errors and shortcomings in the methods of compiling the test questions of the criterion problem in the United States and the methods of compiling the questions in the crime situation test. To demonstrate the advantages and scientific nature of the method of compiling questions for comprehensive cognitive testing, and to provide theoretical basis for the identification of the testing methods in the United States, so as to correct the harm caused by the introduction of "American" lie tests into China. For the psychological testing technology in China's health science to do a little bit.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;D917.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 傅根躍,陳昌凱;傳統(tǒng)測(cè)謊技術(shù)研究現(xiàn)狀與趨勢(shì)[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2003年01期

2 常青山,蘇劍君;我國(guó)犯罪心理測(cè)試技術(shù)的歷史沿革與發(fā)展綜述[J];鐵道警官高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

3 張鴻,武伯欣;犯罪心理測(cè)試技術(shù)實(shí)案應(yīng)用研究[J];云南警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

4 武伯欣;中國(guó)犯罪心理測(cè)試技術(shù)理論論綱[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1698522