歐盟文本與數(shù)據(jù)挖掘版權(quán)例外條款的法律框架評(píng)析
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-20 23:04
本文選題:文本與數(shù)據(jù)挖掘 切入點(diǎn):版權(quán) 出處:《編輯之友》2017年10期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:作為科研利用率極高的文本與數(shù)據(jù)挖掘技術(shù),自產(chǎn)生之初便受科研群體的青睞。由于其在運(yùn)行過(guò)程中的復(fù)制、抓取行為影響到版權(quán)人及數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)制作者的專有權(quán)利,存在法律上的不確定性。在新一輪全球版權(quán)法修改浪潮推動(dòng)下,歐盟開(kāi)始突破現(xiàn)有版權(quán)法桎梏,就"科研目的的文本與數(shù)據(jù)挖掘"使用,提出構(gòu)建版權(quán)例外條款的建議。盡管我國(guó)著作權(quán)法第三次修改草案已定,但我們?nèi)杂斜匾芯繗W盟在此問(wèn)題上的修法過(guò)程,總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn),結(jié)合國(guó)情,適時(shí)立法。
[Abstract]:As a technology of text and data mining with high utilization rate of scientific research, it has been favored by scientific research community since its beginning. Because of its reproduction in the process of operation, grasping behavior affects the exclusive rights of copyright owners and database makers. There is legal uncertainty. Driven by a new wave of global copyright law amendments, the European Union has begun to break through the shackles of existing copyright law and use "text and data mining for scientific research purposes." Although the third revision draft of copyright Law in China has been decided, it is still necessary to study the process of amending the law of EU on this issue, sum up the experience, combine the national conditions, and legislate in good time.
【作者單位】: 中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)學(xué)院;
【基金】:教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地重大項(xiàng)目“知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)國(guó)建設(shè)與版權(quán)保護(hù)”(16JJD820023) 中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)博士生聯(lián)合培養(yǎng)項(xiàng)目資助
【分類號(hào)】:D923.4;D95
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 唐樂(lè)其;法律學(xué)科信息庫(kù)構(gòu)建的研究[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2003年12期
,本文編號(hào):1641184
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1641184.html
教材專著