本文選題：法律解釋　切入點(diǎn)：司法解釋的目標(biāo)　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)的法律解釋包括司法解釋、立法解釋和行政解釋。司法解釋是連接立法與法律適用的紐帶，發(fā)揮著統(tǒng)一法律適用的功能，具有十分重要的理論價(jià)值和實(shí)踐意義。通過(guò)法律解釋方法可以保證法律適用的統(tǒng)一，防止司法活動(dòng)的任意性、保證司法公正、維護(hù)法律權(quán)威。而不同的法律解釋目標(biāo)的理論會(huì)影響對(duì)法律解釋方法的理解，在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上的分歧會(huì)影響法律的確定性。 富勒提出的程序自然法即法律的內(nèi)在道德是對(duì)傳統(tǒng)自然法的超越，其中包含的法治原則是對(duì)法律制度提出的要求，真正的法律應(yīng)當(dāng)具備各項(xiàng)法治原則，否則就是不合格的法律。法律解釋作為法律制度的一部分，也應(yīng)當(dāng)具備程序自然法的內(nèi)在要求：公開(kāi)性、明確性、官方行動(dòng)與公布的規(guī)則一致性。結(jié)合上述法治原則，對(duì)于思考司法解釋的目標(biāo)有很大的幫助。程序自然法的內(nèi)在要求支持了司法解釋目標(biāo)傾向客觀論，最高人民法院的地位和功能決定了司法解釋的統(tǒng)一法律適用的任務(wù)。司法解釋必須遵守現(xiàn)行法律文本的規(guī)定，受其約束，解釋的范圍不能超越審判實(shí)踐的具體法律適用問(wèn)題，它只能是對(duì)理解和適用現(xiàn)有法律文本的理解和幫助，賦予抽象的法律條文在個(gè)案中符合具體情況的指導(dǎo)意義和適用性，但不能改變現(xiàn)有法律，不能違背法律。 本文分為三個(gè)部分，第一部分先介紹了國(guó)外關(guān)于法律解釋目標(biāo)的理論，主要是主觀說(shuō)和客觀說(shuō)這兩類(lèi)最常見(jiàn)的觀點(diǎn)，還專(zhuān)門(mén)介紹了美國(guó)的主觀說(shuō)、動(dòng)態(tài)說(shuō)和文本說(shuō)為后文分析富勒的程序自然法中的法律解釋思想作鋪墊；然后論述了中國(guó)法律語(yǔ)境下的法律解釋與司法解釋的區(qū)別和特點(diǎn)。第二部分通過(guò)對(duì)富勒的程序自然法理論的分析，，從中汲取有關(guān)法律解釋目標(biāo)的原則：法律的公開(kāi)性、明確性和官方行動(dòng)與公布的規(guī)則相一致性，并分析了這些原則中體現(xiàn)出的正義、秩序和效率的價(jià)值對(duì)探尋我國(guó)司法解釋目標(biāo)的意義。第三部分主要圍繞最高人民法院的司法解釋展開(kāi)，討論其形式、地位和統(tǒng)一法律適用的目標(biāo)，分析了司法解釋在制定時(shí)所遵守的價(jià)值取向和指導(dǎo)思想決定了司法解釋的價(jià)值歸屬和理性?xún)?nèi)涵，這也是司法解釋目標(biāo)的意義所在。
[Abstract]:Explain the law of our country including judicial interpretation, legislative interpretation and administrative interpretation. The judicial interpretation is a link of applicable legislation and law, play a unified legal function, it has very important theoretical value and practical significance. Through the legal interpretation method can guarantee the uniform application of the law, to prevent arbitrariness of judicial activities, ensure judicial justice, safeguard the legal authority and legal interpretation. Different target theory will affect the interpretation of understanding of the law, the division will determine the legal effect.
The inherent moral procedure natural law proposed by Fuller that the law is beyond the traditional natural law, which includes the principle of rule of law is put forward on the legal system, the real law should have the principle of the rule of law, otherwise it is not qualified. The legal interpretation of the law as a part of legal system, internal requirements should also have natural procedures method: open, clear, official action and rules published by consistency. According to the principle of the rule of law, is of great help for the consideration of the aim of judicial explanation. Inherent requirement of procedural natural law to support our interpretation of goal orientation objective theory, the status and function of the Supreme People's court decided the uniform law applicable task the judicial interpretation of the judicial interpretation of the provisions. Must abide by the current legal texts, bound by the scope, can not explain the specific application of law in judicial practice beyond question, it It can only help and understand and apply the existing legal texts, and give the guiding meaning and applicability of the abstract legal provisions in specific cases, but it can't change the existing laws, and can't violate the law.
This paper is divided into three parts, the first part introduces the theory about the goal of legal interpretation is mainly foreign, subjective and objective of these two kinds of the most common view, but also specially introduced the subjective, dynamic and text says for the analysis program of natural law in Fuller's thought of legal interpretation to pave the way; and then discusses the differences and characteristics of legal interpretation in the context of China law and judicial interpretation. The second part through the analysis procedure of natural law theory of Fuller, learn the goals related to the principles of legal interpretation: from the publicity of the law, the rules clear and official action and released phase consistency, and analyzes the embodiment these principles of justice, order and efficiency value to explore the goal of China's judicial interpretation of the significance. The third part focuses on the judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court, to discuss the form, status As well as the goal of unified law application, this paper analyzes the value orientation and guiding ideology of judicial interpretation in the formulation, and determines the value attribution and rational connotations of judicial interpretation, which is also the significance of the objective of judicial interpretation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D920.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 布迪厄;強(qiáng)世功;;法律的力量——邁向司法場(chǎng)域的社會(huì)學(xué)[J];北大法律評(píng)論;1999年02期

2 諶洪果;;天人交戰(zhàn)的審判:哈特與富勒之爭(zhēng)的再解讀[J];法律方法與法律思維;2007年00期

3 袁明圣;司法解釋“立法化”現(xiàn)象探微[J];法商研究;2003年02期

4 陳金釗;;法律解釋的藝術(shù)——一種微觀的法治實(shí)現(xiàn)方法[J];法商研究;2009年05期

5 丁戊;法律解釋體系問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué);2004年02期

6 鄒立君;;良好社會(huì)秩序的孜孜探求者:法學(xué)家朗·富勒(之二)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇;2005年12期

7 劉青峰;論審判解釋[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2003年06期

8 宋小海;;程序自然法視域中法律解釋的任務(wù)[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年06期

本文編號(hào)：1557288