本文關(guān)鍵詞： 貸款人環(huán)境責(zé)任 參與管理 所有權(quán)標(biāo)記 擔(dān)保利益 取消抵押品贖回權(quán)　出處：《理論月刊》2014年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：所謂貸款人環(huán)境責(zé)任是指貸款人在特定情形下要對(duì)借款人的設(shè)施或者容器釋放的危險(xiǎn)廢棄物造成環(huán)境污染承擔(dān)責(zé)任。美國(guó)貸款人環(huán)境責(zé)任立法經(jīng)歷了幾次修改。《超級(jí)基金法》規(guī)定了嚴(yán)格責(zé)任和連帶責(zé)任,責(zé)任主體非常寬泛,但存在模糊性。環(huán)境保護(hù)署規(guī)則澄清了《超級(jí)基金法》的模糊之處,但缺乏法律效力。1996年的《貸款人責(zé)任法》吸收了環(huán)境保護(hù)署規(guī)則的內(nèi)容,減輕了貸款人環(huán)境責(zé)任。《棕地再生法》為貸款人購買借款人財(cái)產(chǎn)提供了指引。盡管如此,貸款人環(huán)境責(zé)任風(fēng)險(xiǎn)依然存在。美國(guó)的貸款人環(huán)境責(zé)任立法對(duì)我國(guó)防治土壤污染具有啟示意義。
[Abstract]:The so-called environmental liability of the lender means that the lender is liable for environmental pollution caused by hazardous waste released by the borrower's facility or container under certain circumstances. The legislation on environmental liability of the United States lender has undergone several amendments. The Superfund Act provides for strict liability and joint and several liability. The EPA rules clarify the ambiguities of the Superfund Law, but lack of legal effect. The 1996 Law on lender liability absorbed the content of the EPA rules. This lessens the lender's environmental liability. The Palm Land Renewal Act provides guidance for lenders to buy borrower's property. The environmental liability risk of lenders still exists, and the legislation of environmental liability of lenders in the United States has enlightening significance for preventing and controlling soil pollution in China.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)法學(xué)院;浙江警察學(xué)院法律系;
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張洪潮;按法規(guī)我們?cè)撛趺崔k?[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;1995年01期

2 王森全;論依法治國(guó)的含義——學(xué)習(xí)江澤民關(guān)于依法治國(guó)講話的體會(huì)[J];新疆警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);1996年04期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1540837