本文關(guān)鍵詞： 經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約 實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù) 國(guó)內(nèi)實(shí)施　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文緊緊圍繞《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》的實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù)在我國(guó)履行這個(gè)中心共分三章展開(kāi)討論： 第一章開(kāi)門見(jiàn)山,介紹了締約國(guó)在《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》下所應(yīng)履行的實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù)。具體來(lái)看,第一章共分為兩個(gè)部分：第一節(jié)介紹了《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》結(jié)構(gòu)與主要內(nèi)容,分別從《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》的外在形式和內(nèi)在邏輯兩個(gè)角度予以闡釋。此外,還介紹了《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》中所規(guī)定的權(quán)利及涉及的國(guó)際國(guó)內(nèi)實(shí)施機(jī)制等等問(wèn)題；第二節(jié)介紹了《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》中規(guī)定締約國(guó)所應(yīng)履行的實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù)。首先,介紹了實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù)這一概念。其次,根據(jù)《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》規(guī)定歸納了締約國(guó)應(yīng)履行的實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù)的內(nèi)容。最后,根據(jù)國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者的研究成果對(duì)締約國(guó)應(yīng)履行的實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù)的層次進(jìn)行劃分。 第二章以兩種視角分別考察了我國(guó)履行《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù)的情況。第一種視角是從整體、全局的角度從立法、司法、行政、非政府組織和人權(quán)教育對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利的保障作用這幾個(gè)維度考察了我國(guó)履行《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù)的情況,重在指出我國(guó)實(shí)質(zhì)性義務(wù)履行方面存在的共性特征及存在的問(wèn)題。第二種視角是從經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化各類具體權(quán)利出發(fā),考察《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》中的相關(guān)規(guī)定,經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利委員會(huì)一般性意見(jiàn)的相關(guān)內(nèi)容,我國(guó)保障這類權(quán)利的相關(guān)性立法及政策措施,國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者關(guān)于此類權(quán)利保障的調(diào)查、研究,我國(guó)近年來(lái)有關(guān)暴露出了的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題等。 第三章從三個(gè)大的層面提出了完善我國(guó)履行《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》的途徑與措施。第一節(jié)提出締約國(guó)意欲完善《國(guó)際人權(quán)公約》的履行必然離不開(kāi)國(guó)內(nèi)個(gè)人人權(quán)意識(shí)的培養(yǎng)。通過(guò)追溯人權(quán)公約的歷史可以看出我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化與人權(quán)公約思想內(nèi)涵之間的實(shí)質(zhì)性差異。所以有必要針對(duì)性地建構(gòu)我國(guó)的人權(quán)文化、培養(yǎng)人權(quán)意識(shí)。第二節(jié)介紹了從制度上保障人權(quán)的根本途徑,國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者指出只有制度層面上設(shè)立國(guó)家人權(quán)機(jī)構(gòu)才能更有力地推動(dòng)我國(guó)人權(quán)事業(yè)的發(fā)展、更好地保障和實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)各項(xiàng)人權(quán)。第三節(jié)根據(jù)國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者的概括總結(jié)了我國(guó)人權(quán)保障模式的特點(diǎn)及出路。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the implementation of the substantive obligations of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in China, which is divided into three chapters:. Chapter I begins with an introduction to the substantive obligations of States parties under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In particular, chapter I is divided into two parts: section I describes the Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, The structure and main content of the International Covenant on Social and Cultural Rights are explained in terms of the external form and internal logic of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Issues such as the rights enshrined in the International Covenant on Social and Cultural Rights and the international and domestic implementation mechanisms involved; section II describes the Economic, The International Covenant on Social and Cultural Rights sets out the substantive obligations of States parties... first, the concept of substantive obligations is introduced. Secondly, according to the Economic, The provisions of the International Covenant on Social and Cultural Rights summarize the content of the substantive obligations to be performed by States parties. Finally, according to the research results of scholars at home and abroad, the levels of substantive obligations to be fulfilled by States parties are divided. The second chapter examines the implementation of China's substantive obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights from two perspectives. The dimensions of the role of non-governmental organizations and human rights education in guaranteeing economic, social and cultural rights examine the fulfilment of the substantive obligations of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, It is important to point out the common features and problems in fulfilling our country's substantive obligations. The second angle of view is to examine the economy from the perspective of economic, social and cultural rights. The relevant provisions of the International Covenant on Social and Cultural Rights, the relevant content of the general comment of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the relevant legislative and policy measures of my country to guarantee such rights, Domestic scholars investigate and study the protection of this kind of rights, and some hot issues have been exposed in China in recent years. The third chapter puts forward three aspects to improve the performance of China's economy. The first section points out that the implementation of the International Covenant on Human Rights must depend on the cultivation of the human rights consciousness of the individual. By tracing back to the history of the human rights convention, section 1 points out that the implementation of the International Covenant on Human Rights must be completed by the State party. We can see the substantive difference between our traditional culture and the ideological connotation of human rights conventions. Therefore, it is necessary to construct our human rights culture in a targeted way. The second section introduces the fundamental approach to the institutional protection of human rights. Domestic scholars point out that only the establishment of a national human rights institution at the institutional level can more effectively promote the development of the cause of human rights in China. The third section summarizes the characteristics and the way out of the human rights protection model of our country according to the summary of the domestic scholars.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D998.2;D920.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葉靜漪,魏倩;《經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會(huì)和文化權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》與勞動(dòng)權(quán)的保護(hù)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

2 曲相霏;;十九世紀(jì)末二十世紀(jì)初人權(quán)語(yǔ)詞在中國(guó)的使用[J];法學(xué)家;2008年04期

3 徐顯明;對(duì)人權(quán)的普遍性與人權(quán)文化之解析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年06期

4 曲相霏;;部屬高�！暗胤交迸c受教育權(quán)平等[J];法學(xué);2009年11期

5 郭道暉,陶威;人權(quán)禁區(qū)是怎樣突破的——建國(guó)以來(lái)法學(xué)界重大事件研究(24)[J];法學(xué);1999年05期

6 汪玲;;淺議美國(guó)《權(quán)利法案》[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年02期

7 溫雅琴;;我國(guó)受教育權(quán)問(wèn)題的淺析[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年07期

8 徐顯明;齊延平;;論中國(guó)人權(quán)建設(shè)的五大主題[J];法制現(xiàn)代化研究;2002年00期

9 邁克爾·霍華德;張蒂;吳志成;;國(guó)際安全中聯(lián)合國(guó)作用的歷史發(fā)展[J];南開(kāi)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

10 張千帆;;大學(xué)招生地域歧視的危害[J];民主與科學(xué);2010年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王宏哲;適足住房權(quán)研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1528894