本文關(guān)鍵詞： 教育法律制度 教育督導(dǎo)法律制度 比較研究　出處：《云南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：教育督導(dǎo)制度歷史悠久,它既是一項(xiàng)行政監(jiān)督制度,也是一項(xiàng)教育法律制度。1995年頒布的《中華人民共和國教育法》第24條明確規(guī)定：國家實(shí)行教育督導(dǎo)制度和學(xué)校及其他教育機(jī)構(gòu)教育評估制度�！堵殬I(yè)教育法》第11條,《高等教育法》第44條,《民辦教育促進(jìn)法》第40條和《義務(wù)教育法》第8條都對教育督導(dǎo)制度作了明確的法律規(guī)定。但一直以來,教育督導(dǎo)法制建設(shè)并未得到應(yīng)有的重視。2012年10月《教育督導(dǎo)條例》的頒布,標(biāo)志著教育督導(dǎo)法制進(jìn)入到一個(gè)新的發(fā)展時(shí)期。本論文正是在此背景下選取這一較新的研究方向,以期為我國教育督導(dǎo)法律制度的發(fā)展和完善提出自己的建議。 筆者之所以選取俄羅斯的教育督導(dǎo)法律制度進(jìn)行比較,原因基于以下幾點(diǎn)：第一,俄羅斯作為世界知名的教育大國,其教育督導(dǎo)制度起源較早,有150多年的歷史。俄羅斯擁有一套完整、系統(tǒng)且獨(dú)立的教育督導(dǎo)制度,以科學(xué)的評價(jià)手段、合理的評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系和完善的法律法規(guī)為依據(jù),充分發(fā)揮教育督導(dǎo)的職能,其先進(jìn)的制度和經(jīng)驗(yàn)值得我國借鑒。第二,俄羅斯與中國在教育領(lǐng)域有著深厚淵源。通過比較,也可以發(fā)現(xiàn)兩國教育督導(dǎo)法律制度各有優(yōu)劣。本文通過中俄兩國教育督導(dǎo)法律制度的對比,以期為我國的教育督導(dǎo)法律制度提供有益的借鑒。 全文分為六個(gè)部分：第一部分是緒論。在這部分包括選題緣由、相關(guān)概念、文獻(xiàn)綜述等。第二部分是中俄兩國教育督導(dǎo)法律制度的歷史演變,分時(shí)期、分階段梳理了中俄教育督導(dǎo)法制的歷史進(jìn)程。第三部分比較了中俄兩國的教育督導(dǎo)法律構(gòu)建,主要從立法背景和法律體系兩個(gè)方面對中俄兩國的教育督導(dǎo)法律作了比較。第四部分是中俄教育督導(dǎo)機(jī)構(gòu)法律制度的比較,從機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置、機(jī)構(gòu)獨(dú)立性、機(jī)構(gòu)職權(quán)、機(jī)構(gòu)人員和機(jī)構(gòu)合作機(jī)制五個(gè)方面進(jìn)行比較,分析各自的特點(diǎn)。第五部分是中俄教育督導(dǎo)職能、方式法律制度的比較。第六部分是結(jié)語。 通過比較中俄兩國的教育督導(dǎo)法律制度,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)兩國在教育督導(dǎo)法律制度層面是存在某些相似之處的,但由于歷史背景,社會發(fā)展階段等方面的原因,在具體法律制度方面又存在較大差異。筆者希望通過科學(xué)的分析和比較,對兩國教育督導(dǎo)制度進(jìn)行客觀評價(jià),更重要的是以期為我國教育督導(dǎo)法律制度的構(gòu)建和完善貢獻(xiàn)自己的一份微力。
[Abstract]:Education supervision system has a long history, it is an administrative supervision system. Article 24 of the Education Law of the people's Republic of China, promulgated on 1995, clearly states that:. The State implements a system of educational supervision and evaluation of education in schools and other educational institutions. Article 11 of the Vocational Education Act. Article 44 of the Law on higher Education, Article 40 of the Law on the Promotion of Private Education and Article 8 of the Law on compulsory Education provide clear legal provisions on the system of educational supervision. The construction of educational supervision legal system has not been given due attention. In October 2012, the Regulation of Educational Supervision was promulgated. This paper chooses this relatively new research direction precisely under this background, marks the educational supervision legal system to enter a new development period. In order to develop and perfect the legal system of educational supervision in our country, the author puts forward his own suggestions. The author chooses the Russian educational supervision legal system to carry on the comparison, the reason is based on the following several points: first, Russia as the world famous education big country, its educational supervision system origin is early. Russia has a complete, systematic and independent educational supervision system, based on scientific evaluation means, reasonable evaluation index system and perfect laws and regulations. Give full play to the function of educational supervision, its advanced system and experience is worth learning. Second, Russia and China in the field of education have a deep origin. Through comparison. We can also find that the legal system of educational supervision in both countries has its own merits and demerits. Through the comparison of the legal systems of educational supervision between China and Russia, this paper hopes to provide a useful reference for the legal system of educational supervision in our country. The full text is divided into six parts: the first part is the introduction. In this part, including the reason of the topic, related concepts, literature review, etc. The second part is the historical evolution of the legal system of educational supervision in China and Russia, divided into periods. The third part compares the legal construction of educational supervision between China and Russia. Mainly from the legislative background and the legal system of the two countries to make a comparison of the law of educational supervision. 4th part is the comparison of the legal system of educational supervision institutions in China and Russia, from the establishment of institutions, institutional independence. This paper compares the functions and powers of institutions, personnel and cooperative mechanisms of institutions, and analyzes their respective characteristics. Part 5th is a comparison of the functions of educational supervision in China and Russia, and the comparison of the ways and legal systems. Part 6th is the conclusion. By comparing the legal system of educational supervision between China and Russia, the author finds that there are some similarities in the legal system of educational supervision between the two countries, but due to the historical background, social development stage and other reasons. There are great differences in the specific legal system. The author hopes to make an objective evaluation of the educational supervision system of the two countries through scientific analysis and comparison. More importantly, it is expected to contribute to the construction and perfection of the legal system of educational supervision in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉冬梅;發(fā)達(dá)國家教育督導(dǎo)制度的比較及啟示[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年02期

2 劉永和;;我國基礎(chǔ)教育的督導(dǎo)評估亟待改革[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);2008年S1期

3 史燕來;;加強(qiáng)統(tǒng)籌:提高教育督導(dǎo)整體效能的必然選擇[J];現(xiàn)代教育科學(xué);2008年10期

4 穆嵐;教育督導(dǎo)與教育行政關(guān)系論析[J];教學(xué)與管理;2005年06期

5 孫蘭祥;張建花;;關(guān)于我國教育督導(dǎo)實(shí)效性的思考[J];教學(xué)與管理;2007年06期

6 孟鳳英;;制約教育督導(dǎo)職能發(fā)揮的成因與對策[J];教育評論;2009年05期

7 楊潤勇;;關(guān)于構(gòu)建我國教育督導(dǎo)政策體系的思考[J];教育研究;2007年08期

8 董亞杰;;對俄羅斯高等教育現(xiàn)代化改革的認(rèn)識[J];教書育人;2006年35期

9 王桃英;;教育督導(dǎo)專業(yè)化的政策性探討[J];現(xiàn)代教育管理;2009年03期

10 劉佳;;俄羅斯教育[J];世紀(jì)橋;2006年06期

，

本文編號：1451127