法理:法理學(xué)的中心主題和法學(xué)的共同關(guān)注
發(fā)布時間:2018-01-15 17:03
本文關(guān)鍵詞:法理:法理學(xué)的中心主題和法學(xué)的共同關(guān)注 出處:《清華法學(xué)》2017年04期 論文類型:期刊論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 法理 法理學(xué) 中心主題 共同關(guān)注 法理中國
【摘要】:當(dāng)下,在中國法學(xué)界,共識性"法理"概念尚未凝練出來,把"法理"作為法理學(xué)研究對象和中心主題尚未成為理論自覺,致使"法理"在應(yīng)為"法理之學(xué)"的法理學(xué)知識體系、理論體系、話語體系中處于缺席或半缺席狀態(tài),在部門法學(xué)研究中也沒有引起足夠的關(guān)注和傾力。針對這種狀態(tài),本文提出在法理學(xué)研究中把"法理"作為中心主題,并倡導(dǎo)部門法學(xué)(法律學(xué))與法理學(xué)共同關(guān)注"法理"問題;诖朔N認(rèn)識,本文對"法理"進(jìn)行了語義分析、意義分析和歷史考察,闡述了"法理"在理論和實踐中的意義與功能,并指出隨著"法理"成為法理學(xué)的中心主題和中國法學(xué)的共同關(guān)注,成為法治中國的精神內(nèi)涵,中國法學(xué)必將迎來法理時代,"法治中國"必將呈現(xiàn)"法理中國"的鮮明品質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:At present, in Chinese legal circles, the concept of consensus "jurisprudence" has not been condensed out, and "jurisprudence" as the object of jurisprudence and the central theme has not yet become a theoretical consciousness. As a result, "jurisprudence" should be "the study of jurisprudence" in the knowledge system of jurisprudence, theoretical system, discourse system in absentia or semi-absentee state. In the study of departmental law, there is not enough attention and effort. In view of this situation, this paper puts forward that "jurisprudence" is the central theme in the study of jurisprudence. Based on this understanding, this paper makes a semantic analysis, meaning analysis and historical investigation of "jurisprudence". This paper expounds the significance and function of "legal theory" in theory and practice, and points out that with "jurisprudence" becoming the central theme of jurisprudence and the common concern of Chinese jurisprudence, it has become the spiritual connotation of ruling by law in China. Chinese jurisprudence will usher in the era of legal theory, and "China ruled by law" will present the distinct quality of "legal China".
【作者單位】: 中國法學(xué)會;吉林大學(xué);國家司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心理論創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊;
【基金】:中央馬克思主義理論研究和建設(shè)工程重大項目 國家社會科學(xué)基金重大項目“全面推進(jìn)依法治國重大現(xiàn)實問題研究”(2015MZD042)成果之一
【分類號】:D90
【正文快照】: 近年來,法學(xué)界一定范圍內(nèi)圍繞“中國法理學(xué)的死亡”、“中國需要什么樣的法理學(xué)”進(jìn)行了系列討論,一些青年學(xué)者提出了“中國有沒有過法理學(xué)”、“法理學(xué)在中國還存在不存在”等質(zhì)疑。這些都引起了我的關(guān)注和反思。深刻反思之后,我的結(jié)論是:中國法理學(xué)以其得天獨厚的法律文化涵,
本文編號:1429240
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1429240.html