【摘要】：隨著近兩年高考制度改革,新改革的高考政策對(duì)志愿填報(bào)也進(jìn)行了微調(diào),《2017年高考改革方案》規(guī)定志愿填報(bào)采取考前填報(bào)的方式,相對(duì)于以往高考后根據(jù)分?jǐn)?shù)填志愿,采取考前填報(bào)志愿給高中生尤其是高三學(xué)生帶來(lái)了很大的壓力。而關(guān)于志愿填報(bào)有很多的測(cè)驗(yàn)測(cè)評(píng)工具,但收集文獻(xiàn)整理發(fā)現(xiàn)大部分測(cè)評(píng)量表都是以興趣、能力、性格幾個(gè)維度來(lái)進(jìn)行測(cè)評(píng),通過(guò)調(diào)查得出高中生在選擇志愿時(shí)考慮的因素是復(fù)雜多樣的,因此,本文希望通過(guò)問(wèn)卷調(diào)查編制出一項(xiàng)包含多維度結(jié)構(gòu)的問(wèn)卷——生命事業(yè)問(wèn)卷,并結(jié)合霍蘭德職業(yè)性向測(cè)試作為高中生志愿填報(bào)指導(dǎo)的測(cè)評(píng)工具,指導(dǎo)高中生選擇專業(yè)填報(bào)志愿。本文通過(guò)問(wèn)卷調(diào)查法,進(jìn)行了以下三項(xiàng)研究:一是生命事業(yè)問(wèn)卷的編制,二是大學(xué)生生命事業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀;三是生命事業(yè)問(wèn)卷用于高中生志愿選擇指導(dǎo)的個(gè)案研究。通過(guò)研究得出以下結(jié)論:(1)生命事業(yè)問(wèn)卷包括七個(gè)維度,分別是人格適合度、興趣熱愛度、能力擅長(zhǎng)度、事業(yè)與財(cái)富、關(guān)系與健康、道路與團(tuán)隊(duì)、使命與意義。通過(guò)探索性因素分析、驗(yàn)證性因素分析表明問(wèn)卷結(jié)構(gòu)模型較好,具有良好的信度和效度,符合測(cè)量學(xué)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),可以作為高中生志愿填報(bào)有效測(cè)評(píng)工具。(2)大學(xué)生生命事業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀總體水平上處于中等偏上的水平。在是否獨(dú)生子女、是否班干部、在生源地方面,各維度和總均分均無(wú)顯著差異;在性別上,僅在道路與團(tuán)隊(duì)維度上,存在顯著的差異;在年級(jí)和學(xué)科,各維度存在顯著差異。(3)生命事業(yè)問(wèn)卷與職業(yè)性向測(cè)試可以作為高中生志愿填報(bào)的測(cè)評(píng)工具,并在學(xué)校的測(cè)評(píng)指導(dǎo)中對(duì)學(xué)生具有明顯幫助。
文內(nèi)圖片：
圖片說(shuō)明：生命事業(yè)問(wèn)卷結(jié)構(gòu)模型
[Abstract]:With the reform of the college entrance examination system in the past two years, the newly reformed college entrance examination policy has also fine-tuned the voluntary filling in. The 2017 College entrance examination Reform Program stipulates that the voluntary filling in the college entrance examination should be filled in before and after the college entrance examination. Compared with the previous college entrance examination, volunteering before the entrance examination has brought great pressure to senior high school students, especially senior high school students. However, there are many test and evaluation tools for voluntary filling, but it is found that most of the scales are evaluated in terms of interest, ability and personality. Through the investigation, it is concluded that the factors considered by senior high school students in choosing volunteerism are complex and diverse. Therefore, this paper hopes to compile a questionnaire containing multi-dimensional structure-life career questionnaire. Combined with Holland Occupational orientation Test as the evaluation tool of senior high school students' voluntary filling guidance, the senior high school students are guided to choose professional filling voluntary. Through the method of questionnaire, this paper makes the following three studies: one is the compilation of life career questionnaire, the other is the present situation of college students' life career development, and the third is the case study of life career questionnaire used in the voluntary choice guidance of senior high school students. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the life and career questionnaire includes seven dimensions, namely, personality fitness, interest love, ability length, career and wealth, relationship and health, road and team, mission and significance. Through exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis shows that the questionnaire structure model is good, has good reliability and validity, accords with the measurement standard, and can be used as an effective evaluation tool for senior high school students to fill in voluntarily. (2) the overall level of college students' life career development is in the upper and middle level. In terms of whether the only child is the only child, whether the class cadres are not, there is no significant difference in each dimension and the total average score; in gender, only in the road and team dimension, there are significant differences; in grade and subject, there are significant differences in each dimension. (3) Life career questionnaire and occupational orientation test can be used as evaluation tools for senior high school students, and are of great help to students in the evaluation and guidance of the school.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G637

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 魯奕;;高考志愿填報(bào)策略分析[J];考試周刊;2016年04期

2 胡朝兵;毛宇;王昌善;張希希;;進(jìn)城農(nóng)民工子女城市社會(huì)適應(yīng)問(wèn)卷的編制[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年03期

3 潘衛(wèi)兵;;高考志愿填報(bào)的策略及應(yīng)用[J];價(jià)值工程;2011年36期

4 李雪梅;;實(shí)施新課改高考方案后考生填報(bào)志愿策略——以浙江省為例[J];臺(tái)州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

5 張繼珍;;高考志愿填報(bào)策略建議和分析[J];教學(xué)與管理;2008年13期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李鳳;高考志愿填報(bào)與錄取機(jī)制研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 楊東京;高考志愿填報(bào)中高中生自主選擇能力的調(diào)查和培養(yǎng)路徑研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2015年

2 劉亞蘭;高考升學(xué)指導(dǎo)測(cè)驗(yàn)在京推廣的社會(huì)理解研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2014年

3 陳國(guó)基;高考志愿填報(bào)者的報(bào)考行為的研究[D];南京大學(xué);2014年

4 劉寒梅;大學(xué)生專業(yè)滿意度及其與專業(yè)承諾的關(guān)系研究[D];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué);2014年

5 崔彥曉;高考志愿的個(gè)性化推薦方法研究[D];石家莊鐵道大學(xué);2013年

6 何小明;商務(wù)智能技術(shù)在高考數(shù)據(jù)分析及志愿填報(bào)中的應(yīng)用[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

7 肖燦;數(shù)據(jù)挖掘系統(tǒng)支撐下的高考志愿填報(bào)在線咨詢系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)現(xiàn)[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

8 謝姍珊;場(chǎng)所依戀對(duì)高考志愿填報(bào)的影響[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2012年

9 張丹丹;面向高考考生志愿的智能數(shù)據(jù)分析系統(tǒng)研究[D];中北大學(xué);2011年

10 楊浩杰;高考志愿填報(bào)的數(shù)據(jù)分析研究[D];河南大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2512658