21世紀我國中小學音樂課程標準研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-06-04 07:44
【摘要】：進入21世紀,隨著教育改革的不斷深入,素質(zhì)教育的理念更加深入人心。在此背景下,中小學音樂教育受到了前所未有的重視和矚目。為加強對中小學音樂課程的宏觀管理,充分發(fā)揮音樂教育在素質(zhì)教育中的作用,教育部曾先后頒布實施了三部有關中小學音樂教育的法規(guī)文件。亦即：2000版《九年義務教育全日制小學/初級中學音樂教學大綱(修訂稿)》、2001版《全日制義務教育音樂課程標準(實驗稿)》和2011版《義務教育音樂課程標準》。三部法規(guī)文件的出臺,有效地促進了本世紀以來中小學音樂教育的發(fā)展,進一步推動了國民基礎音樂教育的改革。特別是《音樂新課標》的頒布實施,使傳統(tǒng)的音樂教育觀念得到了改變,以審美為核心的教育理念得到了進一步加強,中小學音樂教育體系也因此得以初步形成。但據(jù)調(diào)查了解,由于受傳統(tǒng)教育觀念的影響,人們對《音樂新課標》實施的意義還缺乏足夠認識。《音樂新課標》雖然已頒布實施近五年,但是很多負有直接責任的教育主管部門、學校領導以及從事一線教學的教師,對其基本理念及內(nèi)涵并不十分清楚�！兑魳沸抡n標》中所闡發(fā)的各種理念和目標尚未得到全面的貫徹落實,教育思想和教學方法仍然停留在《大綱修訂稿》或《標準實驗稿》的層面,《音樂新課標》的內(nèi)涵本質(zhì)及核心要素與《大綱修訂稿》和《標準實驗稿》有何不同,課程性質(zhì)、課程目標、評價標準等都發(fā)生了哪些變化,很多中小學音樂教育工作者對此并不完全熟悉和理解。鑒于此,對三部法規(guī)文件的解讀和比較分析顯得非常重要。本文從三個方面對《大綱修訂稿》、《標準實驗稿》和《音樂新課標》進行了解讀和比較研究。首先,結(jié)合時間背景,對三部法規(guī)文件的實施情況進行了分析,提出了各自的實施內(nèi)容,以及在實施過程中所出現(xiàn)的困難和問題,簡要地闡述、反思了導致困難與問題產(chǎn)生和存在的主要原因。其二,對《大綱修訂稿》、《標準實驗稿》和《音樂新課標》中的核心內(nèi)容及要素進行了比較分析。一是從形式的角度對三部法規(guī)文獻的異同和變化作了對比分析,內(nèi)容包括版本的變化、名稱的變化、篇幅的變化等；二是從內(nèi)容的角度對三部法規(guī)文獻的異同和變化作了對比分析,內(nèi)容包括理念的變化、課程性質(zhì)的變化以及課程內(nèi)容的變化等。其三,提出了實施《音樂新課標》的建議和措施,具體表現(xiàn)在：強調(diào)學科特點、彰顯人文精神；傳授基本技能、提高審美情趣；激發(fā)學習樂趣、創(chuàng)新音樂實踐；加強校本課程建設；創(chuàng)新教育思維、更新教學方法；等等。在此基礎上,對發(fā)展、完善義務教育階段音樂課程標準問題提出了展望。指出,制定和完善與《音樂新課標》相匹配的評價機制和操作方法,是確�！兑魳沸抡n標》順利實施的重要保障。
[Abstract]:In the 21 st century, with the deepening of educational reform, the concept of quality education is more deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. In this context, music education in primary and secondary schools has received unprecedented attention and attention. In order to strengthen the macro management of music curriculum in primary and secondary schools and give full play to the role of music education in quality education, the Ministry of Education has promulgated and implemented three legal documents on music education in primary and secondary schools. That is, the 2000 edition of the whole-day compulsory education music syllabus (revised draft), the 2001 edition of the whole-day compulsory education music curriculum standard (experimental draft) and the 2011 edition of the compulsory education music curriculum standard. The introduction of three laws and regulations has effectively promoted the development of music education in primary and secondary schools since this century and further promoted the reform of national basic music education. In particular, with the promulgation and implementation of the New Music Curriculum Standard, the traditional concept of music education has been changed, the educational concept with aesthetics as the core has been further strengthened, and the music education system in primary and secondary schools has been initially formed. However, according to the investigation and understanding, due to the influence of traditional educational concepts, people still lack sufficient understanding of the significance of the implementation of the New Music Curriculum Standard. Although the New Music Curriculum Standard has been promulgated and implemented for nearly five years, But many of the education authorities with direct responsibility, school leaders and teachers engaged in front-line teaching, It is not very clear about its basic concept and connotation. The various ideas and objectives expounded in the New Music Curriculum Standard have not yet been fully implemented. The educational thought and teaching method are still at the level of "revised outline" or "Standard Experimental draft". How is the connotation, essence and core elements of the New Music Curriculum Standard different from the revised outline and the Standard Experimental draft, and the nature of the curriculum? Many primary and secondary school music educators are not fully familiar with and understand what changes have taken place in curriculum objectives and evaluation standards. In view of this, the interpretation and comparative analysis of the three regulatory documents is very important. This paper interprets and compares the revised outline, the Standard Experimental draft and the New Music Curriculum Standard from three aspects. First of all, combined with the time background, this paper analyzes the implementation of the three regulatory documents, puts forward their respective implementation contents, as well as the difficulties and problems in the implementation process, and briefly expounds, This paper reflects on the main reasons for the emergence and existence of difficulties and problems. Secondly, the core contents and elements of the revised outline, the Standard Experimental draft and the New Music Curriculum Standard are compared and analyzed. First, the similarities and differences and changes of the three legal documents are compared and analyzed from the point of view of form, including the change of version, the change of name, the change of space and so on. The second is to make a comparative analysis of the similarities and differences and changes of the three legal documents from the point of view of content, including the change of concept, the change of curriculum nature and the change of curriculum content. Thirdly, some suggestions and measures for the implementation of the New Music Curriculum Standard are put forward, which are as follows: emphasizing the characteristics of the subject, highlighting the humanistic spirit, imparting the basic skills, improving the aesthetic taste, arousing the fun of learning and innovating the music practice. Strengthen school-based curriculum construction, innovate educational thinking, update teaching methods, and so on. On this basis, this paper puts forward the prospect of developing and perfecting the music curriculum standard of compulsory education. It is pointed out that the formulation and improvement of the evaluation mechanism and operation method matching with the New Music Curriculum Standard is an important guarantee to ensure the smooth implementation of the New Music Curriculum Standard.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：G633.951
本文編號：2492573
[Abstract]:In the 21 st century, with the deepening of educational reform, the concept of quality education is more deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. In this context, music education in primary and secondary schools has received unprecedented attention and attention. In order to strengthen the macro management of music curriculum in primary and secondary schools and give full play to the role of music education in quality education, the Ministry of Education has promulgated and implemented three legal documents on music education in primary and secondary schools. That is, the 2000 edition of the whole-day compulsory education music syllabus (revised draft), the 2001 edition of the whole-day compulsory education music curriculum standard (experimental draft) and the 2011 edition of the compulsory education music curriculum standard. The introduction of three laws and regulations has effectively promoted the development of music education in primary and secondary schools since this century and further promoted the reform of national basic music education. In particular, with the promulgation and implementation of the New Music Curriculum Standard, the traditional concept of music education has been changed, the educational concept with aesthetics as the core has been further strengthened, and the music education system in primary and secondary schools has been initially formed. However, according to the investigation and understanding, due to the influence of traditional educational concepts, people still lack sufficient understanding of the significance of the implementation of the New Music Curriculum Standard. Although the New Music Curriculum Standard has been promulgated and implemented for nearly five years, But many of the education authorities with direct responsibility, school leaders and teachers engaged in front-line teaching, It is not very clear about its basic concept and connotation. The various ideas and objectives expounded in the New Music Curriculum Standard have not yet been fully implemented. The educational thought and teaching method are still at the level of "revised outline" or "Standard Experimental draft". How is the connotation, essence and core elements of the New Music Curriculum Standard different from the revised outline and the Standard Experimental draft, and the nature of the curriculum? Many primary and secondary school music educators are not fully familiar with and understand what changes have taken place in curriculum objectives and evaluation standards. In view of this, the interpretation and comparative analysis of the three regulatory documents is very important. This paper interprets and compares the revised outline, the Standard Experimental draft and the New Music Curriculum Standard from three aspects. First of all, combined with the time background, this paper analyzes the implementation of the three regulatory documents, puts forward their respective implementation contents, as well as the difficulties and problems in the implementation process, and briefly expounds, This paper reflects on the main reasons for the emergence and existence of difficulties and problems. Secondly, the core contents and elements of the revised outline, the Standard Experimental draft and the New Music Curriculum Standard are compared and analyzed. First, the similarities and differences and changes of the three legal documents are compared and analyzed from the point of view of form, including the change of version, the change of name, the change of space and so on. The second is to make a comparative analysis of the similarities and differences and changes of the three legal documents from the point of view of content, including the change of concept, the change of curriculum nature and the change of curriculum content. Thirdly, some suggestions and measures for the implementation of the New Music Curriculum Standard are put forward, which are as follows: emphasizing the characteristics of the subject, highlighting the humanistic spirit, imparting the basic skills, improving the aesthetic taste, arousing the fun of learning and innovating the music practice. Strengthen school-based curriculum construction, innovate educational thinking, update teaching methods, and so on. On this basis, this paper puts forward the prospect of developing and perfecting the music curriculum standard of compulsory education. It is pointed out that the formulation and improvement of the evaluation mechanism and operation method matching with the New Music Curriculum Standard is an important guarantee to ensure the smooth implementation of the New Music Curriculum Standard.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：G633.951
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前4條
1 尚建科;;在眾聲喧嘩中重構(gòu)音樂教育哲學——韋恩·鮑曼著《音樂的哲學視野》述評[J];中國音樂;2013年03期
2 王一品;;給學生一片展示自己的天空——對《音樂課程標準》中重視音樂實踐的幾點認識[J];北方音樂;2012年06期
3 周正基;;艾略特的實踐音樂教育哲學解讀[J];中國音樂;2009年03期
4 劉沛;音樂教育哲學觀點的歷史演進——兼論多維度音樂課程價值及邏輯起點[J];中國音樂;2004年04期
相關博士學位論文 前4條
1 高明星;1949-2009年中國中小學音樂教育八次改革研究[D];哈爾濱師范大學;2013年
2 陳登福;中國基礎教育管理體制改革研究[D];武漢大學;2010年
3 張紅;新中國基礎教育課程政策的價值取向研究[D];東北師范大學;2008年
4 馬達;二十世紀中國學校音樂教育發(fā)展研究[D];福建師范大學;2001年
相關碩士學位論文 前7條
1 張小黨;2001與2011版義務教育音樂課程標準比較研究[D];云南師范大學;2015年
2 張莉莉;音樂“學科綜合”教學及實施策略研究[D];首都師范大學;2014年
3 潘浩然;《義務教育音樂課程標準》比較研究[D];曲阜師范大學;2014年
4 劉龍華;新中國中小學音樂課程的發(fā)展歷程及其啟示[D];江西師范大學;2013年
5 許銳;建國后我國小學音樂教學大綱（課程標準）的比較研究[D];中國音樂學院;2012年
6 紀琛;1966年-2006年中國學校音樂教育與課程發(fā)展研究[D];上海音樂學院;2009年
7 劉昊;新課程音樂教學目標設計初探[D];首都師范大學;2005年
，本文編號：2492573
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2492573.html
教材專著
