【摘要】：教師的糾錯(cuò)是教師在課堂上與學(xué)生互動(dòng)的有效工具,深刻影響著學(xué)生語言的輸入與輸出,而學(xué)習(xí)者對(duì)英語課堂糾錯(cuò)行為的態(tài)度對(duì)學(xué)習(xí)者的語言習(xí)得及課堂教師教學(xué)效果的提高起著非常重要的作用。初中階段是學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)英語的重要時(shí)期,是培養(yǎng)學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)興趣的關(guān)鍵階段,學(xué)習(xí)者對(duì)課堂糾錯(cuò)的態(tài)度對(duì)學(xué)生學(xué)習(xí)英語的興趣有一定的影響,目前,中學(xué)階段糾錯(cuò)的研究存在著眾多不足,初中生對(duì)英語課堂糾錯(cuò)持何種態(tài)度仍是一個(gè)值得探討的問題。本研究采用問卷調(diào)查和訪談的調(diào)查方法,研究初中生對(duì)英語課堂糾錯(cuò)的態(tài)度,揭示出英語學(xué)習(xí)不同水平的初中生對(duì)英語課堂錯(cuò)誤糾正的有效性,是否應(yīng)該糾錯(cuò),錯(cuò)誤糾正的時(shí)機(jī),錯(cuò)誤糾正的類型,錯(cuò)誤糾正的方式,錯(cuò)誤糾正的主體的態(tài)度,并結(jié)合所調(diào)查得出的態(tài)度,對(duì)初中英語一線教師提出課堂糾錯(cuò)的調(diào)整措施,以及針對(duì)在課堂上如何糾錯(cuò)的一些具有實(shí)踐意義的教學(xué)建議。通過研究數(shù)據(jù)分析,得出以下結(jié)論：學(xué)生認(rèn)為教師應(yīng)該多糾正他們的錯(cuò)誤,并且大部分學(xué)生認(rèn)為有錯(cuò)必糾,高低水平的學(xué)生都認(rèn)為糾錯(cuò)對(duì)他們的英語學(xué)習(xí)有至關(guān)重要的作用,可以提高他們的英語水平,高水平學(xué)生認(rèn)為過多的糾錯(cuò)也不會(huì)影響他們的信心,而性格內(nèi)向,自尊心強(qiáng)的部分學(xué)生認(rèn)為他們的信心會(huì)因此受到影響。對(duì)于糾錯(cuò)類型,高水平的學(xué)生認(rèn)為他們的語法錯(cuò)誤應(yīng)該多糾正,詞匯以及語用錯(cuò)誤應(yīng)該少糾正,低水平的學(xué)生認(rèn)為他們所有的錯(cuò)誤都應(yīng)該糾正,語音錯(cuò)誤應(yīng)該少糾正。關(guān)于糾錯(cuò)時(shí)機(jī),高低水平的學(xué)生都認(rèn)為他們的錯(cuò)誤應(yīng)該在他們表達(dá)完后再糾正。同時(shí),低水平的學(xué)生認(rèn)為,他們的錯(cuò)誤應(yīng)該在課后糾正,特別是語法錯(cuò)誤。對(duì)于糾錯(cuò)主體,高水平的學(xué)生更愿意教師引導(dǎo)下的自我糾錯(cuò),低水平的學(xué)生選擇的是教師糾錯(cuò),當(dāng)學(xué)生單獨(dú)回答問題時(shí),大多數(shù)高水平的學(xué)生選擇的是教師指導(dǎo)下的糾錯(cuò),低水平的學(xué)生想要教師糾錯(cuò),當(dāng)學(xué)生在小組活動(dòng)中回答問題時(shí),大多數(shù)高水平學(xué)生選擇的是教師指導(dǎo)下的糾錯(cuò),而低水平學(xué)生選擇的是小組成員幫助其糾錯(cuò)。對(duì)于糾錯(cuò)方式,高水平的學(xué)生選擇的是形式協(xié)商,低水平的學(xué)生選擇的明確糾錯(cuò),尤其是詞匯錯(cuò)誤。綜合所得結(jié)論,教師要正確的對(duì)待學(xué)生的錯(cuò)誤,了解以及重視學(xué)生對(duì)待課堂糾錯(cuò)的態(tài)度。選擇合適的糾錯(cuò)時(shí)機(jī),運(yùn)用不同的糾錯(cuò)方式,同時(shí)要保護(hù)好高低水平尤其是低水平學(xué)生和性格內(nèi)向?qū)W生的的自尊心。在英語課堂的教學(xué)中,滿足不同水平學(xué)生的主要糾錯(cuò)需要,豐富理論知識(shí),提升糾錯(cuò)的語言意識(shí)。加強(qiáng)課堂操作,提高糾錯(cuò)的技巧,提倡自我糾錯(cuò)以及集體糾錯(cuò),公平的對(duì)待不同水平不同性別學(xué)生的錯(cuò)誤,由此提高英語課堂糾錯(cuò)的效果。
[Abstract]:The teacher's error correction is an effective tool for the teacher to interact with the students in the classroom, which deeply affects the input and output of the students' language. Learners' attitude towards error correction in English classroom plays an important role in learners' language acquisition and the improvement of classroom teachers' teaching results. Junior high school is an important period for students to learn English, and it is the key stage to cultivate students' interest in learning. Learners' attitude towards classroom error correction has a certain impact on students' interest in learning English. There are many deficiencies in the research of error correction in middle school, and the attitude of junior high school students towards error correction in English classroom is still a question worth discussing. This study uses questionnaires and interviews to study the attitude of junior middle school students towards error correction in English classroom, and reveals the effectiveness of correction of errors in English classroom by junior high school students with different English learning levels, and whether they should correct errors or not. The opportunity of error correction, the type of error correction, the way of error correction, the attitude of the main body of error correction, and combined with the attitude obtained from the investigation, put forward the adjustment measures of classroom correction for the first-line teachers of junior middle school English. And some practical teaching suggestions on how to correct errors in the classroom. Through the analysis of the research data, the following conclusions are drawn: the students think that teachers should correct their mistakes more, and most students think that errors must be corrected, and the high and low level students all think that error correction is of vital importance to their English learning. High-level students believe that too much error correction will not affect their confidence, while the introverted, self-respecting part of the students believe that their confidence will be affected. For the type of correction, high-level students think that their grammatical errors should be corrected more, vocabulary and pragmatic errors should be less corrected, low-level students should correct all their mistakes, and phonological errors should be corrected less. When it comes to error-correcting opportunities, high-and low-level students think their mistakes should be corrected after they have expressed them. At the same time, low-level students believe that their mistakes should be corrected after class, especially grammatical errors. For error correction subjects, high-level students are more willing to self-correct under the guidance of teachers, low-level students choose teachers to correct errors, when students answer questions alone, the majority of high-level students choose error correction under the guidance of teachers. Low-level students want teachers to correct errors. When students answer questions in group activities, most high-level students choose error correction under the guidance of teachers, while low-level students choose group members to help them correct errors. For error correction, high-level students choose form negotiation, and low-level students choose explicit error correction, especially vocabulary errors. According to the conclusion, teachers should treat students' mistakes correctly, understand and attach importance to students' attitude towards classroom error correction. Choose the right error correction opportunity, use different error correction methods, and protect the self-esteem of high and low level students, especially low-level students and introverted students. In the teaching of English class, we should satisfy the main needs of students with different levels of error correction, enrich the theoretical knowledge, and improve the language consciousness of error correction. Strengthen the classroom operation, improve the error correction skills, advocate self-error correction and collective error correction, treat the errors of students of different levels and sexes fairly, so as to improve the effect of error correction in English classroom.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：G633.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 顧紅兵;;What is the Most Effective Method of Error Correction in L2 Writing?[J];海外英語;2011年10期

2 ZENG Wei;;The Methodology of Self-correction on College Students' English Composition and Results[J];海外英語;2014年16期

3 王雪珍;;On Employing the Appropriate Error Correction Strategies to Promote Students'English learning in TEFL[J];科技信息;2009年03期

4 侯廣旭;談?wù)動(dòng)⒄ZCorrection等修辭格[J];四川外語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1992年01期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 LIU Xiao-hui;LIN Hong-lei ;MOU Wei-hua;;Analysis of the Reliability of the Protected Memories Affected by Soft Errors[A];第四屆中國(guó)衛(wèi)星導(dǎo)航學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集-S5 衛(wèi)星導(dǎo)航增強(qiáng)與完好性監(jiān)測(cè)[C];2013年

2 ;Single Staged RePair for Severe HyPosPdias with the Modifying Koyanagi Technique:ExPerience in 20 Cases ExPerience in 18 Case[A];第十六屆全國(guó)泌尿外科學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2009年

3 YANG Wenke;GONG Hang;ZHU Xiangwei;SUN Guangfu;;Non-reciprocity correction using broadcast ephemeris in Two-way Satellite Time and Frequency Transfer (TWSTFT)[A];第四屆中國(guó)衛(wèi)星導(dǎo)航學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集-S4 原子鐘技術(shù)與時(shí)頻系統(tǒng)[C];2013年

4 ;Size Concentration Modeling Method for Slashing Process Based on Output Variable Dynamic Correction[A];Proceedings of the 2011 Chinese Control and Decision Conference（CCDC）[C];2011年

5 XING Nan;HU Xiaogong;CAO Yueling;SU Ranran;WU Xiaoli;;Forecast of equivalent clock correction and its application[A];第五屆中國(guó)衛(wèi)星導(dǎo)航學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集-S3 精密定軌與精密定位[C];2014年

6 ZHANG Yize;CHEN Junping;GONG Xiuqiang;WU Bin;WANG Jiexian;YANG Sainan;LI Mao;;Modeling and application of COMPASS satellite orbits and clocks predicted correction[A];第五屆中國(guó)衛(wèi)星導(dǎo)航學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集-S5 衛(wèi)星導(dǎo)航增強(qiáng)與完好性監(jiān)測(cè)[C];2014年

7 林三益;杝翼正;;發(fā)展壓力修正法計(jì)算流體與顆粒交互作用問題(英文)[A];2009年度海峽兩岸工程力學(xué)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

8 ;Design of Fuzzy Controller for Flue Gas Temperature of Dedust With Self-set Correction Factor[A];Proceedings of the 2011 Chinese Control and Decision Conference（CCDC）[C];2011年

9 ;Design of AM-OLED Gamma Correction System Based on the LUT[A];中國(guó)光學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)2011年學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)摘要集[C];2011年

10 Wenjun Zhao;Qing Gao;Daliang Gong;;Analysis on correction accuracy of ionospheric model for Beidou system[A];第五屆中國(guó)衛(wèi)星導(dǎo)航學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集-S6 北斗/GNSS測(cè)試評(píng)估技術(shù)[C];2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 毛永麗;同伴糾錯(cuò)對(duì)減少高中生英語寫作動(dòng)詞錯(cuò)誤的有效性研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2015年

2 靳利莎;高中英語課堂教師糾錯(cuò)方式的調(diào)查研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2016年

3 沈貞;高中不同群體學(xué)生對(duì)英語課堂口語糾錯(cuò)的偏好研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2016年

4 高梁藝;初中生對(duì)英語課堂糾錯(cuò)態(tài)度的調(diào)查研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2016年

5 董林燕;高中英語課堂中糾錯(cuò)行為與學(xué)生期待的對(duì)比研究[D];山西師范大學(xué);2016年

6 龐慧哲;基于云平臺(tái)的轉(zhuǎn)錄組數(shù)據(jù)Error correction算法的研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2015年

7 趙珊珊;非英語專業(yè)研究生自我糾正口語語法錯(cuò)誤的動(dòng)態(tài)研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2015年

8 李珊珊;初中英語課堂口語糾錯(cuò)策略運(yùn)用調(diào)查[D];沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué);2013年

9 孫巧;高中英語課堂上教師糾錯(cuò)方式的案例研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2015年

10 張繁;大學(xué)英語作文糾錯(cuò)實(shí)踐[D];華中師范大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2448199