【摘要】：古詩(shī)詞因其精準(zhǔn)的辭藻、優(yōu)美的語(yǔ)言、獨(dú)特的韻味、真摯的情感,成為我國(guó)文學(xué)史花園中的一朵耀眼奇葩。語(yǔ)文教材中選用言辭優(yōu)美的古詩(shī)詞,可似山間清泉洗滌學(xué)生的心靈,亦如天籟之音沐浴著學(xué)生的靈魂,時(shí)而如泣如訴,時(shí)而慷慨激昂。這不僅深刻影響學(xué)生的靈魂,更會(huì)影響中華上下數(shù)千年文化的傳播與弘揚(yáng)。因此,研究語(yǔ)文教材中的古詩(shī)詞選編,有著非常重大的意義。通過(guò)語(yǔ)文課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的指引,各地方結(jié)合本地特色及文化理念,相繼改進(jìn)語(yǔ)文教材,于是各版教材呈現(xiàn)出爭(zhēng)奇斗艷的繁榮景象。在不同類型的教科書(shū)中,語(yǔ)文出版社印發(fā)的語(yǔ)文教材使用范圍逐漸擴(kuò)大,人民教育出版社印發(fā)的語(yǔ)文教材影響范圍最大。因此,本文以語(yǔ)文版和人教版初中語(yǔ)文教材中的古詩(shī)詞為研究對(duì)象,運(yùn)用對(duì)比研究、文本細(xì)讀、數(shù)據(jù)分析三種不同的方法,對(duì)兩者古詩(shī)詞選編現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行研究。通過(guò)研究可以發(fā)現(xiàn),兩版教材在古詩(shī)詞選編方面不僅存在共同點(diǎn),還存在不同之處。但不可忽視的是,兩者的古詩(shī)詞選編仍然存在一些不足,針對(duì)這些不足,本文分別提供優(yōu)化建議。論文由四個(gè)章節(jié)構(gòu)成,第一章為緒論。第二章介紹語(yǔ)文版與人教版初中語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)詞選編研究的依據(jù),主要根據(jù)《義務(wù)教育語(yǔ)文課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》《完善中華優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化教育指導(dǎo)綱要》。第三章首先用表格展示兩版語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)詞的總體概況,接著對(duì)兩版教材古詩(shī)詞進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析。在選文方面,兩版教材古詩(shī)詞的相同點(diǎn)表現(xiàn)為題材豐富、形式多樣、文質(zhì)兼美等五個(gè)方面;不同點(diǎn)體現(xiàn)為精讀詩(shī)詞所占比例、略讀詩(shī)詞拓展程度、單元內(nèi)主題相關(guān)性三個(gè)方面的不同。在編排方面,兩版教材古詩(shī)詞的相同點(diǎn)體現(xiàn)為圖文結(jié)合、配有注釋、設(shè)計(jì)習(xí)題三方面;不同點(diǎn)體現(xiàn)為詩(shī)詞分布不同、導(dǎo)語(yǔ)提示不同兩個(gè)方面。第四章總結(jié)兩版初中語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)詞選編存在的不足。在選文方面,兩版教材的共同不足體現(xiàn)為唐宋詩(shī)詞比例過(guò)大,語(yǔ)文版的不足為詩(shī)詞間聯(lián)系不緊密,人教版的不足為精讀詩(shī)詞比例過(guò)小。在編排方面,兩版教材的共同不足體現(xiàn)為插圖設(shè)置不完善,語(yǔ)文版的不足為書(shū)下注釋詳略欠佳,人教版的不足為略讀詩(shī)詞編排過(guò)于集中。針對(duì)以上不足,在選文方面,本文認(rèn)為兩版教材應(yīng)調(diào)整不同朝代詩(shī)詞的比重,語(yǔ)文版需加強(qiáng)詩(shī)詞間的聯(lián)系,人教版需增加精讀詩(shī)詞的數(shù)量。在編排方面,兩版教材應(yīng)合理設(shè)計(jì)插圖,語(yǔ)文版需完善書(shū)下注釋,人教版略讀詩(shī)詞需分散編排。通過(guò)對(duì)語(yǔ)文版與人教版初中語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)詞選編的對(duì)比研究,以期對(duì)今后兩版教材古詩(shī)詞選編的改革提供一點(diǎn)啟示。
[Abstract]:Because of its precise rhetoric, beautiful language, unique charm and sincere emotion, ancient poetry has become a dazzling flower in the garden of Chinese literary history. Chinese teaching materials choose beautiful words of ancient poetry, can wash the soul of students like the mountain spring, but also like the sound of nature bathed in the soul of the students, sometimes like sobs, sometimes impassioned. This not only profoundly affects the soul of the students, but also affects the spread and promotion of thousands of years of culture in China. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the selection of ancient poems in Chinese textbooks. Through the guidance of the Chinese curriculum standard and combining the local characteristics and cultural ideas, the Chinese teaching materials have been improved one after another, so the textbooks in each edition show a spectacular and prosperous scene. In different types of textbooks, the use of Chinese textbooks published by Chinese publishing houses is gradually expanded, and the influence of Chinese textbooks issued by people's Education Publishing House is the greatest. Therefore, this paper studies the present situation of the selection and compilation of ancient poems with three different methods, such as comparative study, text reading and data analysis, taking the ancient poetry words in the Chinese textbooks of the Chinese version and the people's Education Edition as the research objects. Through the research, it can be found that there are not only common points but also differences in the selection and compilation of ancient poems between the two editions of textbooks. But what can not be ignored is that there are still some shortcomings in the selection of ancient poems between the two. In view of these shortcomings, this paper provides some suggestions for optimization. The paper consists of four chapters, the first chapter is the introduction. The second chapter introduces the basis of the study on the selection and compilation of ancient poetry in the Chinese textbooks of junior middle school, mainly according to the Curriculum Standard of compulsory Education, the guiding outline of perfecting Chinese excellent traditional Culture and Education. The third chapter shows the general situation of ancient poems and poems in two editions of Chinese textbooks with tables, and then makes a comparative analysis of the two editions of ancient poems. In the aspect of selecting articles, the similarities of ancient poems and poems in the two editions are as follows: rich in subject matter, diverse in form, and both in quality and beauty; The differences are reflected in the proportion of intensive reading of poetry, the degree of expansion of poetry and the relevance of themes within the unit. In the aspect of arrangement, the similarities of ancient poetry and ci in the two editions are the combination of picture and text, with annotation and design exercises, and the different points are the different distribution of poetry and the different cues. The fourth chapter summarizes the shortcomings of the selection of ancient poems in the two editions of junior middle school Chinese textbooks. In the aspect of selecting articles, the common deficiency of the two editions of textbooks is that the proportion of poems in Tang and Song dynasties is too large, the deficiency of the Chinese version is that the relationship between poetry and ci is not close, and the deficiency of people's education edition is that the proportion of intensive reading of poetry is too small. In the aspect of arrangement, the common deficiency of the two editions is that the illustration is not perfect, the Chinese version is not enough to annotate under the book, and the people's education edition is too concentrated on the arrangement of the skimming poems. In view of the above shortcomings, this paper holds that the two editions of textbooks should adjust the proportion of poems in different dynasties, the language version should strengthen the relationship between poetry and ci, and the people's education edition should increase the number of poems read carefully. In terms of arrangement, the two editions of teaching materials should reasonably design illustrations, the Chinese version needs to perfect the notes under the book, and the people's education edition should distribute the arrangement of the skimming poems. Through a comparative study on the selection of ancient poetry in Chinese textbooks of junior middle school and people's education edition, the author hopes to provide some enlightenment to the reform of the selection of ancient poems in the two editions of textbooks in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G633.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孔秀紅;;人教版小學(xué)語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)詞選文的現(xiàn)狀及思考[J];課外語(yǔ)文;2016年04期

2 薛劍莉;萬(wàn)素花;秀梅;;人教版小學(xué)語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)詞選文的現(xiàn)狀及得失[J];教學(xué)與管理;2015年32期

3 王姚姚;;初中語(yǔ)文教材宋詞選編理念的若干思考[J];現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)文(學(xué)術(shù)綜合版);2015年11期

4 付新?tīng)I(yíng);王玲毓;王順貴;;論小學(xué)語(yǔ)文教材中古詩(shī)詞選擇編排的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題——以人教版教材中李白、蘇軾的詩(shī)詞為例[J];上饒師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

5 張睿;;人教版與鄂教版初中教材古詩(shī)詞的選編比較[J];中學(xué)語(yǔ)文;2014年31期

6 蘇新春;邱燕林;;中國(guó)大陸與臺(tái)灣中小學(xué)語(yǔ)文教材選文比較[J];江西科技師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

7 蘇涵;;教學(xué)非經(jīng)典選文的理性選擇——兼談中學(xué)語(yǔ)文教材的選編問(wèn)題[J];語(yǔ)文教學(xué)通訊;2012年32期

8 吳麗娟;;對(duì)蘇教版小學(xué)語(yǔ)文古詩(shī)文教材選編及教學(xué)研究的分析[J];基礎(chǔ)教育研究;2012年08期

9 肖建云;;論語(yǔ)文教材選編的基本標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];文學(xué)教育(下);2011年04期

10 范勇;;在古詩(shī)文的教學(xué)中傳承中華民族優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2008年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王姚姚;現(xiàn)行蘇、滬版初中語(yǔ)文教材宋詞選編比較研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年

2 路珊珊;人教版小學(xué)語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)詞選編研究[D];聊城大學(xué);2014年

3 趙笳旭;人教版與長(zhǎng)春版初中語(yǔ)文教材中文言文的比較研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué);2011年

4 付云;初中古詩(shī)文教材選編研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

5 朱嫣紅;蘇教版初中語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)詞選編研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

6 黃圣淑;人教版初中語(yǔ)文教材內(nèi)容體系研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年

7 趙黎麗;初中語(yǔ)文教材編排體系芻議[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

8 戴婉琴;初中語(yǔ)文教材古代作品選文探討[D];華東師范大學(xué);2008年

9 楊小平;人教版、北師大版、蘇教版初中語(yǔ)文教材之比較[D];西北師范大學(xué);2006年

10 關(guān)國(guó)青;高中語(yǔ)文教材古詩(shī)文研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2441180