【摘要】：綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)對(duì)學(xué)生發(fā)展全面性提出要求,但在具體實(shí)施中仍在結(jié)果呈現(xiàn)如量尺構(gòu)建、分層的需求困惑以及評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果解釋上存在難點(diǎn)和不足。本文首先分析了PISA測(cè)評(píng)和TIMSS測(cè)評(píng)對(duì)于測(cè)評(píng)結(jié)果量尺及其分層的構(gòu)建,以及對(duì)于結(jié)果解釋中相關(guān)影響模型的構(gòu)建;其次基于上述工作,本文進(jìn)一步分析指出兩大測(cè)評(píng)在結(jié)果解釋上存在系統(tǒng)性構(gòu)建的特點(diǎn),同時(shí)指出統(tǒng)計(jì)模型的合理使用有助于目標(biāo)量尺及其分層、結(jié)果解釋證據(jù)的形成。根據(jù)評(píng)價(jià)是基于證據(jù)的推斷這一評(píng)價(jià)本質(zhì)的認(rèn)識(shí),本文指出需進(jìn)一步提升綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)中量化模型及量化技術(shù)運(yùn)用的多樣性和合理性,有效處理好量化技術(shù)與定性方法的整合,從而有利于綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)中證據(jù)鏈的形成和挖掘,為評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果解釋的有效性和系統(tǒng)性奠定基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Comprehensive quality evaluation requires students' development comprehensiveness, but there are still some difficulties and shortcomings in the implementation of the comprehensive quality evaluation, such as the construction of scale, the bewilderment of layered demands and the interpretation of evaluation results. Firstly, this paper analyzes the construction of PISA and TIMSS evaluation for the measurement results and their stratification, as well as the construction of the relevant impact model in the interpretation of the results. Secondly, based on the above-mentioned work, this paper further analyzes the characteristics of systematic construction in the interpretation of the results of the two assessments, and points out that the rational use of the statistical model is helpful to the formation of the target scale and its stratification, and the result explains the formation of evidence. According to the understanding that evaluation is based on the inference of evidence, this paper points out that it is necessary to further improve the diversity and rationality of the application of quantitative models and quantitative techniques in comprehensive quality evaluation, and effectively deal with the integration of quantitative techniques and qualitative methods. It is beneficial to the formation and excavation of evidence chain in comprehensive quality evaluation and lays a foundation for the validity and systematization of the interpretation of evaluation results.
【作者單位】： 上海市教育考試院;華東師范大學(xué)開放教育學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“基于上海學(xué)業(yè)水平考試和PISA測(cè)評(píng)數(shù)據(jù)的綜合素質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)研究”(14BGL125)的部分成果
【分類號(hào)】：G632.0

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周琴;;PISA2003對(duì)學(xué)生學(xué)業(yè)成績(jī)的測(cè)評(píng)、分析及其啟示[J];上海教育科研;2006年09期

2 陸t，

本文編號(hào)：2427077