陜西中考英語閱讀理解內(nèi)容效度研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-16 14:23
【摘要】：在中國學(xué)生看來,從進(jìn)入小學(xué)開始直到大學(xué)畢業(yè),都會參加許許多多的考試,在這其中,英語考試占據(jù)了不少比例。中考英語,是廣大學(xué)生和教師非常熟悉的一項(xiàng)考試。同時(shí)它也是僅次于高考的一項(xiàng)大型考試。其中的閱讀部分更是重中之重。由于這場考試的關(guān)鍵性和重要性。所以它的質(zhì)量也是受到社會各界人士的關(guān)注。說到考試質(zhì)量那么效度就必須是一個(gè)首要因素了。從某種方面是來說,一套考試的效度直接關(guān)系到這套試題的質(zhì)量。多少年來,各位專家學(xué)者在效度方面的研究也有很多,然而,本文作者卻發(fā)現(xiàn),對于中考英語閱讀理解部分效度研究及其罕見。綜上所述,本文就以2011至2015年陜西中考英語的閱讀部分為例來研究其效度。目的在于探索1)近五年來陜西中考英語的閱讀部分的內(nèi)容效度,2)老師及學(xué)生對陜西中考英語的閱讀部分的滿意程度如何。在研究之前,作者準(zhǔn)備了一些必要的資料,陜西省中考考試說明(2015年為最新版本),陜西省初中英語課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及有效的效度研究框架(結(jié)合幾位專家的效度框架而制定)。在研究過程中,作者以近5年來的陜西中考閱讀題型為研究對象,結(jié)合相關(guān)資料,采用定性分析和定量分析的方法來進(jìn)行研究。客觀地分析了試題的制定情況,了解了試題的效度,同時(shí)指出了試題的些許瑕疵。詳細(xì)的研究步驟如下:首先,作者將效度框架研究劃分為下列維度:測試說明,測試輸入變量,預(yù)期答題,以及輸入與答題間的關(guān)系。接著,將中考英語閱讀按照這五個(gè)維度進(jìn)行分析和驗(yàn)證,同時(shí)客觀地將數(shù)據(jù)與相關(guān)參考資料(課程標(biāo)準(zhǔn))進(jìn)行比較。最后,作者采用了信度較高的調(diào)查問卷來獲取老師和學(xué)生對于中考英語閱讀試題的看法,并科學(xué)的處理了數(shù)據(jù)。經(jīng)過如此復(fù)雜的研究,本文得出以下結(jié)論:第一,整體來說,陜西中考英語閱讀理解的內(nèi)容效度較高�？陀^的數(shù)據(jù)表明,試題內(nèi)容與課題標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與考試說明所規(guī)定的要求高度吻合。第二,通過分析,作者仍可以發(fā)現(xiàn)中考英語閱讀理解試題有一些瑕疵,例如,閱讀技能的分布有些不均衡,閱讀篇章的體裁分布不合理,以及整體的閱讀速度處于較低水平等。第三,通過調(diào)查問卷反省,盡管在某些問題存在異議,整體上來說不論是老師還是學(xué)生對于中考英語閱讀測試的滿意度是較高的。
[Abstract]:For Chinese students, from the beginning of primary school to college, they take a lot of exams, and English accounts for a large proportion of them. English examination is a very familiar test for students and teachers. At the same time, it is second only to the college entrance examination of a large examination. Among them, the reading part is the most important. Because of the importance and importance of the exam. So its quality is also the concern of people from all walks of life. When it comes to the quality of the exam, the validity of the test must be a primary factor. In some ways, the validity of a set of tests is directly related to the quality of the set of questions. Over the years, many experts and scholars have done a lot of research on validity. However, the author of this paper finds that the study of partial validity of reading comprehension in middle school is rare. To sum up, this paper studies the validity of the reading part of Shaanxi Middle School English Test from 2011 to 2015. The purpose is to explore 1) the content validity of reading part of Shaanxi middle school English test in recent five years, and 2) how satisfied teachers and students are with the reading part of Shaanxi middle school English test. Prior to the study, the author prepared some necessary materials, including the instructions for the Shaanxi Provincial Middle School examination (2015 is the latest version), the Shaanxi Junior High School English Curriculum Standard and the effective validity Research Framework (based on the validity framework of several experts). In the course of the research, the author takes the reading question type of Shaanxi middle school examination in recent 5 years as the research object, combines the related data, adopts the qualitative analysis and the quantitative analysis method to carry on the research. This paper objectively analyzes the formulation of the test questions, understands the validity of the questions, and points out some defects in the questions. The detailed research steps are as follows: first, the validity framework is divided into the following dimensions: test description, test input variables, expected answer, and the relationship between input and answer. Then, the paper analyzes and verifies English reading according to these five dimensions, and objectively compares the data with relevant reference materials (curriculum standards). Finally, the author uses a high reliability questionnaire to obtain the teachers' and students' views on the English reading test, and scientifically processes the data. After such a complicated study, the paper draws the following conclusions: first, the content validity of reading comprehension in Shaanxi junior high school is relatively high. Objective data show that the content and standard of the test are highly consistent with the requirements stipulated in the test description. Secondly, through the analysis, the author can still find that there are some defects in the English reading comprehension test of the middle school, such as the uneven distribution of reading skills, the unreasonable genre distribution of reading texts, and the low reading speed as a whole. Third, through questionnaire reflection, although there are some differences in some questions, the overall satisfaction of both teachers and students for the English reading test is higher.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延安大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：G633.41
本文編號：2382500
[Abstract]:For Chinese students, from the beginning of primary school to college, they take a lot of exams, and English accounts for a large proportion of them. English examination is a very familiar test for students and teachers. At the same time, it is second only to the college entrance examination of a large examination. Among them, the reading part is the most important. Because of the importance and importance of the exam. So its quality is also the concern of people from all walks of life. When it comes to the quality of the exam, the validity of the test must be a primary factor. In some ways, the validity of a set of tests is directly related to the quality of the set of questions. Over the years, many experts and scholars have done a lot of research on validity. However, the author of this paper finds that the study of partial validity of reading comprehension in middle school is rare. To sum up, this paper studies the validity of the reading part of Shaanxi Middle School English Test from 2011 to 2015. The purpose is to explore 1) the content validity of reading part of Shaanxi middle school English test in recent five years, and 2) how satisfied teachers and students are with the reading part of Shaanxi middle school English test. Prior to the study, the author prepared some necessary materials, including the instructions for the Shaanxi Provincial Middle School examination (2015 is the latest version), the Shaanxi Junior High School English Curriculum Standard and the effective validity Research Framework (based on the validity framework of several experts). In the course of the research, the author takes the reading question type of Shaanxi middle school examination in recent 5 years as the research object, combines the related data, adopts the qualitative analysis and the quantitative analysis method to carry on the research. This paper objectively analyzes the formulation of the test questions, understands the validity of the questions, and points out some defects in the questions. The detailed research steps are as follows: first, the validity framework is divided into the following dimensions: test description, test input variables, expected answer, and the relationship between input and answer. Then, the paper analyzes and verifies English reading according to these five dimensions, and objectively compares the data with relevant reference materials (curriculum standards). Finally, the author uses a high reliability questionnaire to obtain the teachers' and students' views on the English reading test, and scientifically processes the data. After such a complicated study, the paper draws the following conclusions: first, the content validity of reading comprehension in Shaanxi junior high school is relatively high. Objective data show that the content and standard of the test are highly consistent with the requirements stipulated in the test description. Secondly, through the analysis, the author can still find that there are some defects in the English reading comprehension test of the middle school, such as the uneven distribution of reading skills, the unreasonable genre distribution of reading texts, and the low reading speed as a whole. Third, through questionnaire reflection, although there are some differences in some questions, the overall satisfaction of both teachers and students for the English reading test is higher.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延安大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：G633.41
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 辜向東;李志芳;張書奎;;大學(xué)英語四級考試快速閱讀部分內(nèi)容效度研究[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2009年01期
2 劉凌;;TEM-4閱讀理解測試內(nèi)容效度分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期
3 辜向東,關(guān)曉仙;CET閱讀測試與大學(xué)英語閱讀教材易讀度抽樣研究[J];西安外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期
4 鄒申,張艷莉,周越美;閱讀測試中題目類型、策略與分?jǐn)?shù)的關(guān)系——TEM4考試閱讀項(xiàng)目的答題效度研究[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2002年05期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 邱勁;高考英語重慶卷閱讀測試內(nèi)容效度研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年
2 陳燕;全國碩士研究生入學(xué)統(tǒng)一考試英語考試的閱讀理解內(nèi)容效度研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2007年
，本文編號：2382500
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2382500.html
最近更新
教材專著
