高中地理課堂引導行為診斷研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-15 19:50
【摘要】：課堂引導行為屬于課堂教學行為的分支研究。它是教師素質(zhì)、教學理念、專業(yè)知識和教學技能的綜合動態(tài)表征。本研究采用文獻梳理法、專家咨詢法、課堂觀察法和教育統(tǒng)計法等研究方法,從引導行為的三結(jié)構層次:引導目標、引導內(nèi)容和引導方式構建了高中地理課堂引導行為的診斷量表。并運用診斷量表分別對10位新手型和專家型教師進行課堂觀察診斷,同時對兩類教師的行為頻次百分比進行顯著性相關t值檢驗,歸納當前高中地理課堂引導行為存在的主要問題,提出行為矯正對策,并選取一位教師進行案例實證。本研究旨在理論方面豐富地理教師課堂教學行為評價研究,實踐方面推動地理教師課堂實踐教學能力發(fā)展。本文首先將課堂引導行為的基本內(nèi)涵定義為:教師在課堂教學情境下根據(jù)課程標準、學生基礎、教學目標、教學內(nèi)容在課堂教學過程中對學生所實施的一系列言語或活動形式的啟發(fā)與引導行為。并從引導的起源、本質(zhì)、動力和歸屬四個方面進行了本文的理論研究。通過參考相關文獻,咨詢地理教育專家、一線地理名師,并結(jié)合教學實踐經(jīng)驗,遴選了課堂講解行為、課堂提問行為和課堂呈示行為3大一級指標,并從引導行為的三結(jié)構層次遴選了9大二級指標,按照不同的行為水平層次細分了 40個三級指標,構建了基于課堂觀察的診斷量表。通過專家(學者)訪談對診斷量表進行修改和完善,為診斷研究確定了針對的診斷工具。本文運用診斷量表對5位新手型和5位專家型高中地理教師的課堂引導行為現(xiàn)狀進行診斷,運用SPSS19.0軟件對兩類教師的行為頻次百分比進行差異性相關t值檢驗,并通過對比兩類教師的行為平均百分頻數(shù),歸納出當前高中地理教師課堂引導行為存在如下問題:第一,課堂引導行為缺乏思想引領,站位不高;第二,講解行為缺乏歸納提升,升階不夠;第三,提問行為缺乏深入互動,交流不足;第四,呈示行為引導方式單一,變式不多。為此,筆者從行為消失和行為強化兩方面提出引導行為矯正對策:第一,完善地理PCK知識,深化行為元認知;第二,落實學生主體地位,增強行為互動性;第三,汲取優(yōu)秀教師經(jīng)驗,改善行為調(diào)控力;第四,加強自我診斷能力,提升行為效能感。最后通過對編號為XS01教師的案例追蹤研究來檢驗矯正對策的科學性和有效性。本研究通過構建診斷量表,了解了當前高中地理課堂引導行為的水平現(xiàn)狀,為豐富課堂教學行為評價研究提供理論探索;提出引導行為的矯正對策,為高中地理教師課堂教學能力發(fā)展提供了實踐路徑。但是本文的診斷量表具有局限性和診斷樣本覆蓋面有限,分析路徑不夠完善,信度和效度還有待提高。
[Abstract]:Classroom guidance behavior belongs to the branch research of classroom teaching behavior. It is a comprehensive dynamic representation of teachers' quality, teaching ideas, professional knowledge and teaching skills. This study adopts the methods of literature combing, expert consultation, classroom observation and educational statistics. The guiding content and the guiding method are used to construct the diagnostic scale of geography classroom guidance behavior in senior high school. Ten novice and expert teachers were observed and diagnosed by using diagnostic scale, and the percentage of behavioral frequency of the two types of teachers was tested by significant correlation t value. This paper sums up the main problems existing in the guiding behavior of geography classroom in senior high school, puts forward the countermeasures of behavior correction, and selects a teacher as a case study. The purpose of this study is to enrich the evaluation of geography teachers' classroom teaching behavior in theory and to promote the development of geography teachers' practical teaching ability in practice. This paper first defines the basic connotation of classroom guidance behavior as: teachers in the classroom teaching context according to curriculum standards, student basis, teaching objectives, The act of enlightening and guiding students in a series of speech or activity forms in the course of classroom teaching. And from the origination, nature, power and attribution of the four aspects of the theoretical study of this paper. By referring to relevant literature, consulting geography education experts, leading geography teachers, and combining teaching experience, this paper selects three major indicators: classroom explaining behavior, classroom questioning behavior and classroom presentation behavior. Nine secondary indicators were selected from the three levels of leading behavior, and 40 third-level indicators were subdivided according to different behavioral levels, and a diagnostic scale based on classroom observation was constructed. The diagnostic scale is modified and perfected by experts (scholars), and the diagnostic tools are determined for the diagnosis research. This paper uses diagnostic scale to diagnose the classroom guidance behavior of 5 novice and 5 expert senior high school geography teachers, and uses SPSS19.0 software to test the difference correlation t value of the two kinds of teachers' behavior frequency percentage. And by comparing the average frequency of the two types of teachers' behavior, we conclude that the current high school geography teachers' classroom guidance behavior has the following problems: first, the classroom guidance behavior is lack of ideological guidance, the position is not high; second, Explanation behavior lack of induction promotion, not enough; third, questioning behavior lack of in-depth interaction, insufficient communication; fourth, presentation behavior guidance mode is single, not many variations. Therefore, the author puts forward some countermeasures to guide the behavior correction from the aspects of behavior disappearance and behavior strengthening: first, to perfect the knowledge of geographical PCK and deepen the behavior metacognition; second, to carry out the student's subject status and enhance the interaction of behavior; third, Learn from the experience of excellent teachers, improve the ability of behavioral regulation; fourth, strengthen self-diagnosis ability, enhance the sense of behavioral efficacy. Finally, a case study named XS01 teacher is used to test the effectiveness and scientificalness of corrective countermeasures. Through the construction of diagnostic scale, this study understands the current level of geography classroom guidance behavior in senior high school, provides theoretical exploration for enriching the research on classroom teaching behavior evaluation, and puts forward the corrective measures for guiding behavior. It provides a practical path for the development of high school geography teachers' classroom teaching ability. However, the diagnostic scale of this paper has limitations and limited coverage of diagnostic samples, the analysis path is not perfect, reliability and validity need to be improved.
【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G633.55
本文編號：2244337
[Abstract]:Classroom guidance behavior belongs to the branch research of classroom teaching behavior. It is a comprehensive dynamic representation of teachers' quality, teaching ideas, professional knowledge and teaching skills. This study adopts the methods of literature combing, expert consultation, classroom observation and educational statistics. The guiding content and the guiding method are used to construct the diagnostic scale of geography classroom guidance behavior in senior high school. Ten novice and expert teachers were observed and diagnosed by using diagnostic scale, and the percentage of behavioral frequency of the two types of teachers was tested by significant correlation t value. This paper sums up the main problems existing in the guiding behavior of geography classroom in senior high school, puts forward the countermeasures of behavior correction, and selects a teacher as a case study. The purpose of this study is to enrich the evaluation of geography teachers' classroom teaching behavior in theory and to promote the development of geography teachers' practical teaching ability in practice. This paper first defines the basic connotation of classroom guidance behavior as: teachers in the classroom teaching context according to curriculum standards, student basis, teaching objectives, The act of enlightening and guiding students in a series of speech or activity forms in the course of classroom teaching. And from the origination, nature, power and attribution of the four aspects of the theoretical study of this paper. By referring to relevant literature, consulting geography education experts, leading geography teachers, and combining teaching experience, this paper selects three major indicators: classroom explaining behavior, classroom questioning behavior and classroom presentation behavior. Nine secondary indicators were selected from the three levels of leading behavior, and 40 third-level indicators were subdivided according to different behavioral levels, and a diagnostic scale based on classroom observation was constructed. The diagnostic scale is modified and perfected by experts (scholars), and the diagnostic tools are determined for the diagnosis research. This paper uses diagnostic scale to diagnose the classroom guidance behavior of 5 novice and 5 expert senior high school geography teachers, and uses SPSS19.0 software to test the difference correlation t value of the two kinds of teachers' behavior frequency percentage. And by comparing the average frequency of the two types of teachers' behavior, we conclude that the current high school geography teachers' classroom guidance behavior has the following problems: first, the classroom guidance behavior is lack of ideological guidance, the position is not high; second, Explanation behavior lack of induction promotion, not enough; third, questioning behavior lack of in-depth interaction, insufficient communication; fourth, presentation behavior guidance mode is single, not many variations. Therefore, the author puts forward some countermeasures to guide the behavior correction from the aspects of behavior disappearance and behavior strengthening: first, to perfect the knowledge of geographical PCK and deepen the behavior metacognition; second, to carry out the student's subject status and enhance the interaction of behavior; third, Learn from the experience of excellent teachers, improve the ability of behavioral regulation; fourth, strengthen self-diagnosis ability, enhance the sense of behavioral efficacy. Finally, a case study named XS01 teacher is used to test the effectiveness and scientificalness of corrective countermeasures. Through the construction of diagnostic scale, this study understands the current level of geography classroom guidance behavior in senior high school, provides theoretical exploration for enriching the research on classroom teaching behavior evaluation, and puts forward the corrective measures for guiding behavior. It provides a practical path for the development of high school geography teachers' classroom teaching ability. However, the diagnostic scale of this paper has limitations and limited coverage of diagnostic samples, the analysis path is not perfect, reliability and validity need to be improved.
【學位授予單位】：華中師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G633.55
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 林培英;張冬梅;;漫談高中地理核心素養(yǎng)的提出[J];地理教育;2016年03期
2 尹達;;國外課堂教學診斷研究述評[J];世界教育信息;2015年12期
3 李家清;常珊珊;;核心素養(yǎng):深化地理課程改革的新指向[J];地理教育;2015年04期
4 尹達;;課堂教學自我診斷:教師專業(yè)發(fā)展的核心能力[J];基礎教育;2014年06期
5 劉明坤;;行為矯正技術在學校教育中的應用[J];沈陽師范大學學報(社會科學版);2010年02期
6 蔡寶來;車偉艷;;國外教師課堂教學行為研究：熱點問題及未來趨向[J];課程.教材.教法;2008年12期
7 林正范;賈群生;;教師行為研究:課程與教學論的重要研究方向[J];教育研究;2006年10期
8 張建瓊;國內(nèi)外課堂教學行為研究之比較[J];外國教育研究;2005年03期
9 王向東,袁孝亭;地理素養(yǎng)的核心構成和主要特點[J];課程.教材.教法;2004年12期
10 高紅,叢榮華;運用創(chuàng)設問題情景進行啟發(fā)式教學——微格教學中的應用[J];長春師范學院學報;2004年07期
相關博士學位論文 前2條
1 王世存;化學學習負遷移診斷及矯正研究[D];華中師范大學;2013年
2 閆龍;地理教師課堂教學行為研究[D];華東師范大學;2008年
相關碩士學位論文 前9條
1 姚澤陽;PCK：“專業(yè)標準”下新手型高中地理教師培養(yǎng)研究[D];華中師范大學;2015年
2 楊青青;新手—專家地理教師課堂教學行為差異研究[D];四川師范大學;2014年
3 黃顯鳳;高中語文教師教學觀與課堂教學行為關系之個案研究[D];西北師范大學;2013年
4 戴家瑜;小學教師啟發(fā)式課堂教學行為的研究[D];遼寧師范大學;2013年
5 許應鵬;高中地理有效教學與低效教學的課堂行為差異研究[D];華中師范大學;2011年
6 董海燕;基于課堂觀察改進初中英語教學的行動研究[D];華東師范大學;2010年
7 崔亞利;新課程背景下高中地理教師課堂教學行為研究[D];東北師范大學;2010年
8 丁潔;高中優(yōu)質(zhì)地理課教師課堂教學行為評價研究[D];華東師范大學;2010年
9 范宗山;化學教師課堂教學行為的比較研究[D];山東師范大學;2009年
，本文編號：2244337
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2244337.html
教材專著
