【摘要】：柏拉圖《王制》卷一中蘇格拉底與智術(shù)師特拉緒馬科斯關(guān)于正義定義的論辯,不僅在卷一、也在全書占有極為關(guān)鍵的地位,蘇格拉底面臨的來自智術(shù)師的這一重大挑戰(zhàn),實(shí)際上統(tǒng)領(lǐng)了全書關(guān)于正義及相關(guān)問題的討論。但是,這場論辯理解起來并不容易。細(xì)致徹底地梳理這場論辯,既可以透辟揭示特拉緒馬科斯的正義理解蘊(yùn)含或潛藏的種種觀念和立場,也可以清楚展示蘇格拉底反駁特拉緒馬科斯的諸種細(xì)節(jié)及其致勝的關(guān)鍵,還能指出進(jìn)一步思考這場論爭之思想史意義的可能方向。
[Abstract]:Socrates' argument on the definition of justice with Tracus Marcos, the intellectual artist in Plato's first book, occupies a crucial position not only in Volume 1, but also in the book. Socrates faces this great challenge from a master of wits. In fact, he led the book's discussion of justice and related issues. But this debate is not easy to understand. Carefully and thoroughly combing this argument can not only reveal all kinds of concepts and positions implied or hidden in Tracula Marcos' just understanding, but also clearly show Socrates' refutation of various details of Tracula Marcos and the key to his victory. It can also point out the possible direction of further thinking about the significance of this controversy in the history of thought.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學(xué)人文社會科學(xué)高等研究院;
【基金】：中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)項(xiàng)目“西方古典政治哲學(xué)經(jīng)典翻譯與研究(一)”(106112015CDJXY470010)、中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)項(xiàng)目“《牛津古典辭典》中文版翻譯工程”(CQDXWL-2014-Z014)
【分類號】：B502.231
，

本文編號：2137691