本文選題：徐昂 + 京氏易傳��； 參考：《湘潭大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：京房易學是西漢官方易學的代表,而《京氏易傳》是京房僅存著作,開后世熔陰陽五行、干支納甲于一爐的易學研究風氣之先,其重要性不言而喻。《京氏易傳》有孫吳陸績注,過于簡略,頗難理解。民國徐昂為此書作箋,其箋甚為精博,兼釋京書和陸注,是目前對《京氏易傳》最詳細的箋釋之作。后世學者對于徐昂的《京氏易傳箋》時有引之,然全面系統(tǒng)的研究之作則未有,鑒于此,論文即以《京氏易傳箋》為研究對象。文章對徐昂的生平、著作、治學理念進行介紹與闡釋,探討《京氏易傳箋》的箋釋淵源與創(chuàng)作背景,知其人,論其世,以為《京氏易傳箋》的研究提供基礎準備。《京氏易傳箋》之旨有二:一是訂正京書的訛誤,二是箋釋京氏易學的體例,兩者是論文論述的主體。對于第一點,論文主要對其勘誤成就進行解析,對其偶失之處進行訂補。對于第二點,依據(jù)徐昂箋釋之法,分申注、附注、訂注和補注四方面進行論述。申注即依京房和陸績的發(fā)凡例詳加注釋;附注則是對諸家易說,義可旁通,兼采以注釋京書,如書中索引孟喜、鄭玄和虞翻說;訂注則是對京陸偶有所失,詳為辯證,正其所失;補注則是對京書中不完整的地方略為增補。徐昂箋釋一出,后世學者對于其中的建候積算部分的八宮建始以及氣候分數(shù)的改動,提出了質疑,尤其是對徐昂改動巽兌兩宮的建始,爭議頗大。論文對其各種駁議辨其流別,論其是非,如有未知,則闕如也。學者們對于徐昂之說雖有質疑,并立新說,不無道理,然皆證據(jù)不足,未可遽定徐昂之說為必非。文章對《京氏易傳箋》全書肯定其成就與影響,并探討其缺點與不足,瑕不掩瑜,徐昂之后,在《京氏易傳》的研究中,其箋釋仍是一個繞不過去的高峰,因此徐昂的《京氏易傳箋》具有里程碑式的意義。
[Abstract]:Jing Fang Yi was the representative of the official Yi study in the Western Han Dynasty, while Jing Fang's Yi Zhuan was the only book that existed in Jingfang. It was self-evident before the Yi study atmosphere of opening up the later generations to melt Yin Yang and five elements, and the dry branches and the armour were in the same furnace. [Jing Yi Zhuan] has Sun Wu Luji Note. It is too simple to understand. In the Republic of China, Xu Ang wrote the book, which was very precise, and also interpreted Beijing Book and Lu Note, which was the most detailed interpretation of Jing Shi Yi Zhuan at present. Later scholars have cited Xu ang's "Jing's Yi Zhuan Notes", but no comprehensive and systematic research has been done. In view of this, the thesis takes "King's Yi Zhuan Notes" as the research object. This paper introduces and interprets Xu Ang's life, works and academic ideas, probes into the origin and background of his notes, knows the people, and discusses the world. The purpose of "Jing's Yi Zhuan Paper" is two: one is to correct the error of Beijing book, the other is to explain the style of Jing's Yi study, both of which are the main body of the thesis. For the first point, the thesis mainly analyzes its error-correction achievements and makes up for its occasional loss. As for the second point, according to Xu'ang 's interpretation method, it is discussed in four aspects: the method of interpretation, the annotation, the note, the binding note and the supplementary note. The notes are annotated in detail according to the issuing examples of Jing Fang and Lu Ji. The notes refer to Zhujiayi, saying that the meaning can be bypassed, and taking notes on Beijing books, such as the index of Meng Xi, Zheng Xuan and Yu Quan in the book. The supplement is a slight supplement to the incomplete parts of the Beijing book. Xu Nangjian explained that later scholars have questioned the changes in the eight houses and the climate scores in the part of building climate products, especially in the case of Xu's modification of the founding of the two houses of Sundwe. In this paper, it is discussed that what is right or wrong, if there is unknown, it is absent. Although scholars have doubts about Xu'anzhi 's theory, it is not unreasonable, but all of them have insufficient evidence, and Xu'anzhi 's theory cannot be regarded as inevitable. The article affirms its achievement and influence to the book of Jing's Yi Zhuan, and discusses its shortcomings and shortcomings. After Xu Ang, in the study of Jing's Yi Zhuan, its interpretation is still a peak that cannot be bypassed. Therefore, Xu'ang 's "King's Yi Zhuan Notes" has milestone significance.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B221

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前5條

1 劉華;;徐益修與《徐益修全書》研究[J];延邊教育學院學報;2014年05期

2 陳侃理;;京房的《易》陰陽災異論[J];歷史研究;2011年06期

3 劉玉建;試論京房易學中的世卦起月例──兼與朱伯]先生商榷[J];周易研究;1996年02期

4 林忠軍;陸績象數(shù)易學述評[J];周易研究;1996年01期

5 余敦康;;京房易學的象數(shù)模式與義理內涵[J];周易研究;1992年02期

，

本文編號：2100573