本文選題：思想史研究 + 概念辨析　； 參考：《史學(xué)月刊》2017年09期

【摘要】：正思想史研究需要一定的方法,而方法應(yīng)從概念辨析入手。概念辨析之于思想史研究,類似于考證之于歷史研究,都屬于基礎(chǔ)性工作。在思想史研究中,有不少概念辨析的學(xué)術(shù)行為,但是鮮有學(xué)者對(duì)其方法進(jìn)行總結(jié)�？紤]到概念辨析的種類很多,有同語(yǔ)詞概念辨析、近義詞概念辨析、中西語(yǔ)詞概念辨析等,相應(yīng)的方法也不一而足,非一篇小文所能講清,亦非一人所能勝任,故筆者擇取其中最具基礎(chǔ)
[Abstract]:A certain method is needed to study the history of positive thoughts, and the method should be analyzed from the concept. Concept discrimination in the history of thought, similar to textual research in the history of history, are basic work. In the study of the history of thought, there are many academic behaviors of concept discrimination, but few scholars sum up their methods. Considering that there are many types of conceptual discrimination, such as conceptual discrimination of synonyms, concepts of Chinese and western words, and so on, and there are many corresponding methods, which are neither clear nor competent in a single article, Therefore, the author chooses the most basic one.
【作者單位】： 南開(kāi)大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：B2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 劉寶才;關(guān)于先秦思想史研究的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];張家口職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

2 何成軒,岑賢安;少數(shù)民族哲學(xué)思想史研究的可喜成果——讀《中國(guó)少數(shù)民族哲學(xué)思想史論集》[J];哲學(xué)研究;1986年07期

3 諸慶清;中國(guó)近代政治思想史研究的對(duì)象問(wèn)題[J];杭州師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1985年01期

4 張榮明;;近百年中國(guó)思想史研究探索與反思[J];西北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

5 李，

本文編號(hào)：1956658