本文選題：先秦儒家 + 圣人觀　； 參考：《山東師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：儒家文化是中國傳統(tǒng)文化的主體，而圣人是儒家追求的最高理想人格。圣人觀是聯(lián)系儒家政治哲學(xué)、人生哲學(xué)的紐帶，是心性論問題得以提出和發(fā)展的動因，是導(dǎo)出修養(yǎng)論的合理根源。先秦時期是儒家圣人觀的形成階段，對整個儒家圣人觀的發(fā)展起到重要作用。研究先秦時期儒家圣人觀的發(fā)展演變，有利于了解儒家圣人觀的起源與發(fā)展，全面把握儒家圣人觀產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展與演變的過程，有利于從整體上了解儒家思想的基本內(nèi)容，為更深入地研究儒學(xué)打下基礎(chǔ)。 本文重點是通過對先秦儒家圣人觀的梳理，從而找到先秦儒家圣人觀產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展與演變的規(guī)律及其原因。首先，第一章從文字意義和文獻(xiàn)記載之“圣”兩個方面探究“圣”字的本源。第二章分析先秦儒者在認(rèn)同“內(nèi)圣外王”的義理架構(gòu)下，對圣人的不同規(guī)定與理解。從孔子到曾子，再從曾子到子思、孟子、荀子，他們的圣人觀都有自己的特色，先秦儒家圣人觀經(jīng)歷了一個產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展與演變的歷程。第三章是分析先秦諸子百家中其他各家的圣人觀，并與儒家圣人觀加以對比。第四章是在以上各章節(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上，總結(jié)先秦儒家圣人觀發(fā)展演變的規(guī)律及其原因，以對先秦儒家圣人觀的發(fā)展演變進行更全面深入的探討。最后一章，主要探討了先秦儒家圣人觀對后世的影響，以及當(dāng)代新儒學(xué)對先秦儒家圣人觀的批判與超越。
[Abstract]:Confucian culture is the main body of Chinese traditional culture, and sage is the highest ideal personality pursued by Confucianism. The concept of sage is the link between Confucian political philosophy and philosophy of life. It is the reason for the development and development of the theory of mind and nature, and the reasonable source of the theory of self-cultivation. Pre-Qin period is the formation stage of Confucian sage view, which plays an important role in the development of Confucian sage view. The study of the development and evolution of the Confucian concept of saints in the pre-Qin period is conducive to understanding the origin and development of the Confucian concept of saints, comprehensively grasping the process of the emergence, development and evolution of the concept of Confucian saints, and helping to understand the basic contents of Confucianism as a whole. To lay a foundation for a deeper study of Confucianism. The emphasis of this paper is to find out the rules and reasons for the emergence, development and evolution of the pre-Qin Confucian sage view by combing the pre-Qin Confucian concept of saints. First, the first chapter explores the origin of the word from two aspects: the meaning of writing and the holy word recorded in the literature. The second chapter analyzes the different rules and understandings of the saints in the frame of justice. From Confucius to Zengzi, then from Zengzi to Zizi, Mencius, Xunzi, their saintly views all have their own characteristics. The third chapter is to analyze the sage view of other schools of hundred pre-Qin schools, and compare it with Confucian sage view. On the basis of the above chapters, the fourth chapter summarizes the law and reasons of the development and evolution of the Confucian sage view of the Pre-Qin Dynasty, in order to conduct a more comprehensive and in-depth discussion on the development and evolution of the pre-Qin Confucian concept of sainthood. In the last chapter, the author mainly discusses the influence of Confucian sage view on later generations, and the criticism and transcendence of modern neo-Confucianism to the pre-Qin Confucian sage view.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：B222

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋野草;;從儒家的圣人觀看其現(xiàn)代價值[J];安陽工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

2 陳來;;竹簡《五行》篇與子思思想研究[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年02期

3 湯一介;;論儒家的境界觀[J];北京社會科學(xué);1987年04期

4 孟獻(xiàn)剛;;從《中庸》辨析子思的儒家思想體系[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(高教版);2009年01期

5 付曉瓊;評儒家“圣人”境界說[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2000年04期

6 劉紅霞;;曾子研究綜述[J];重慶社會科學(xué);2009年02期

7 汪建華;論“內(nèi)圣”和“外王”的統(tǒng)一與矛盾[J];船山學(xué)刊;2000年03期

8 魏仕慶;孔子心目中的圣人形象[J];船山學(xué)刊;2004年01期

9 王衛(wèi)東;;“圣”之原型考——兼論中國古代的圣人觀[J];楚雄師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年11期

10 趙榮波;;《易傳》中的君子觀和圣人觀[J];東岳論叢;2006年03期

，

本文編號：1907399