本文選題：成德之教 + 牟宗三��； 參考：《江淮論壇》2017年04期

【摘要】：牟宗三關于朱熹理學思想的批評,有著自己的理由和根據。這樣的理由和根據,根源于牟宗三對于儒學思想的發(fā)展歷史的與眾不同的解讀和關于儒學思想的本質的與眾不同的理解和詮釋。由于牟宗三把儒學思想的本質理解和詮釋為是為人的自覺自律的道德實踐提供理論根據和思想支持,因此,從人的本性中揭示道德價值的來源和從人的本心即原初意識中發(fā)現道德意識,也就成為宋明新儒學繼承和發(fā)展儒學思想的理論課題和歷史使命。在他看來,朱熹的理學思想偏離了這一理論課題和歷史使命,因此不是繼承和發(fā)展儒學思想的正宗主流。牟宗三關于朱熹理學思想的批評,重新思考和探索了儒學思想的發(fā)展歷史和儒學思想的本質問題,對于反省和反思全球化語境中的儒學思想存在和發(fā)展的可能性和現實性不無啟迪和借鑒的價值和意義。
[Abstract]:Mou Zongsan's criticism of Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism has its own reasons and bases. The reasons and bases are rooted in Mou Zongsan's unique interpretation of the history of Confucianism and his distinctive understanding and interpretation of the essence of Confucianism. Since Mou Zongsan interpreted the essence of Confucianism as providing theoretical basis and ideological support for the moral practice of self-discipline, To reveal the source of moral value from human nature and to discover moral consciousness from the original consciousness became the theoretical subject and historical mission for the Neo-Confucianism in Song and Ming dynasties to inherit and develop Confucianism. In his opinion, Zhu Xi's thought of Neo-Confucianism deviates from this theoretical subject and historical mission, so it is not the mainstream of inheriting and developing Confucianism. Mou Zongsan's criticism of Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism reconsiders and explores the development history of Confucianism and the essence of Confucianism. To reflect on and reflect on the possibility and reality of the existence and development of Confucianism in the context of globalization, it is not without the value and significance of inspiration and reference.
，

本文編號：1898716