本文選題：康德 + 理性　； 參考：《延安大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：康德的哲學(xué)被稱為批判哲學(xué),他生活在一個批判的時代他。通過發(fā)表《純理論批判》一書,康德利用人類的理性的批判對其認知能力畸形戀分門別類,這是康德學(xué)說中,最具獨創(chuàng)性和重要性的部分,它提供了一個科學(xué)的界定和哲學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)。純粹理性的界定包括的主要內(nèi)容的科學(xué)解釋哲學(xué)的本質(zhì)。康德的批判哲學(xué)是先天的,康德的先驗詞匯手段和人知道的對象之前,它需要理解人的認知能力重要的調(diào)查,以定義的范圍和限制人類的理解。所以,從合理界定理解康德的“純理性批判”,通過康德的批判哲學(xué)方法和背景的理論和方法劃定康德的批判哲學(xué)精神的“純粹理性批判”展示中,體驗到強烈的反應(yīng)和思維方式的轉(zhuǎn)變的影響超出其使命和對當(dāng)前一代。本文的論述順序是依據(jù)康德的《純粹理性批判》展開觀點和看法的論述,第一章即從人類感性的部分開始,分析與論述了時間的主要性質(zhì)在感性與理性之中屬于前者而不屬于后者,并且時間是以一種感性的、直觀的形式表現(xiàn)出來,而并非是一般的感性所包含的表現(xiàn)形式。在此基礎(chǔ)上考量先天法則形成的內(nèi)在邏輯,論證范疇和先天形式之間的關(guān)系,最后確立先天純粹知識體系能夠科學(xué)地建構(gòu)出形而上學(xué)。第二章是建立在科學(xué)形而上學(xué)基礎(chǔ)上的理論延伸,即對傳統(tǒng)形而上學(xué)的批判,它首先對理性心理學(xué)所形成的內(nèi)在錯誤加以分析,以此為基礎(chǔ)闡述理性宇宙論何以能形成二律背反的狀況,并將神學(xué)同理性有機統(tǒng)一,促使理性神學(xué)的先驗幻相,最后發(fā)現(xiàn)傳統(tǒng)形而上學(xué)的錯誤本源在于對范疇的超驗使用,并立足于此對現(xiàn)象和本體進行劃分。第三章是對前兩章理論體系的方法論總結(jié),它主要強調(diào)了先天綜合如何在調(diào)和經(jīng)驗論和唯理論的基礎(chǔ)上科學(xué)地論證這純粹理性的建筑術(shù)。
[Abstract]:Kant's philosophy is called critical philosophy. He lives in a critical age. By publishing the critique of pure theory, Kant used the rational criticism of human beings to categorize his cognitive ability into malformed love, which is the most original and important part of Kant's theory. It provides a scientific definition and philosophical basis. The definition of pure rationality includes the nature of the philosophy of scientific interpretation of the main content. Kant's critical philosophy is innate. Before Kant's transcendental lexical means and objects are known, it needs to understand the important investigation of human cognitive ability in order to define the scope and limit human understanding. Therefore, from a reasonable definition to understand Kant's "pure rational criticism", through Kant's critical philosophical method and background of the theory and method to delineate Kant's critical philosophy spirit of "pure rational criticism" display, Experience the impact of intense reactions and changing ways of thinking beyond its mission and to the current generation. The order of this thesis is based on Kant's critique of Pure reason. The first chapter begins with the part of human sensibility. This paper analyzes and discusses that the main properties of time belong to the former but not to the latter in the sensibility and rationality, and that time is expressed in a perceptual and intuitive form, but not in the form of general sensibility. On this basis, the inherent logic of the formation of the innate law is considered, and the relationship between the category and the congenital form is demonstrated. Finally, the establishment of the innate pure knowledge system can scientifically construct metaphysics. The second chapter is the theoretical extension based on scientific metaphysics, that is, the criticism of traditional metaphysics. On this basis, the author expounds the reason why rational cosmology can form the state of "two laws against", and unifies theology with reason organically, and promotes the transcendental illusion of rational theology. Finally, it is found that the origin of traditional metaphysics lies in the transcendental use of category. And based on this, the phenomenon and ontology are divided. The third chapter summarizes the methodology of the theoretical system of the first two chapters. It emphasizes how the innate synthesis scientifically demonstrates this pure rational architectural technique on the basis of reconciling empiricism and rationalism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延安大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B516.31

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 倪梁康;;“自我”發(fā)生的三個階段——對胡塞爾1920年前后所撰三篇文字的重新解讀[J];哲學(xué)研究;2009年11期

2 吳宏政;;先驗思辨邏輯初探——關(guān)于“形而上學(xué)何以可能”問題的新思路[J];哲學(xué)研究;2009年08期

3 李美輝;自我意識在西方哲學(xué)史上的發(fā)展歷程[J];北方論叢;2005年04期

4 鄧曉芒;康德自由概念的三個層次[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期

5 倪梁康;康德哲學(xué)中“自身意識”的雙重性質(zhì)與功能[J];浙江學(xué)刊;2000年04期

6 俞吾金;從抽象認識論到意識形態(tài)批判[J];天津社會科學(xué);1995年05期

7 楊方;主體概念新探[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;1994年03期

，

本文編號：1898825