歷史意識(shí)與義理詮釋——以朱熹《四書(shū)章句集注》中“道統(tǒng)”觀為例
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-16 19:31
本文選題:朱熹 + 四書(shū)��; 參考:《杭州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年03期
【摘要】:朱熹于六十歲之齡撰成《中庸章句序》、標(biāo)舉"道統(tǒng)"之說(shuō),將孔、曾、思、孟"四子"與《大學(xué)》《論語(yǔ)》《中庸》《孟子》"四書(shū)"配合,確立孔門(mén)之傳的文本內(nèi)容,賦予"四書(shū)"經(jīng)典神圣屬性,饒有宣言意義。朱熹一生追尋"二程",標(biāo)舉孟子繼承絕學(xué),建構(gòu)圣圣相承系譜,于是上溯而及于堯、舜、禹、湯、文、武、周公歷敘群圣之傳,繼而及于孔子地位的確認(rèn),又進(jìn)而梳理孔子、曾子、子思、孟子心法相傳、《孟子》文本當(dāng)中圣圣相傳之線(xiàn)索,促發(fā)人們對(duì)朱熹道統(tǒng)的再思考,厘清性善說(shuō)法,確立儒學(xué)內(nèi)涵,綰合兩者,溯源衍流,遂能響應(yīng)北宋以來(lái)儒學(xué)自覺(jué)的思潮與反省,激化圣化歷史的想象,古今之間,環(huán)環(huán)相扣,工夫與境界,融鑄于一。經(jīng)典詮釋必須回歸歷史情境,甚至必須在語(yǔ)脈當(dāng)中方能得見(jiàn)注者的思考與用心。義理詮釋存在諸多歷史線(xiàn)索,誠(chéng)乃毋庸置疑之事。朱熹以此建構(gòu)儒學(xué)圣賢相傳的歷史意象,一抒個(gè)人的終極情懷,皆慨然以承擔(dān)"道統(tǒng)"為己任,遂能喚起無(wú)比之感動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:At the age of 60, Zhu Xi wrote the "Zhanzhang sentence of the Golden mean", presenting the theory of "Taoism" and combining Kong, Zeng, Si, Meng's "four sons" with "the Analects of the Analects" and "the Middle mean" and "Mencius" "four Books" to establish the textual content of the biography of Confucius.The four Books are endowed with the sacred attributes of the Classics and have the significance of declaration.Zhu Xi pursued the "two stages" in his life, marked Mencius' inheritance, and constructed a genealogy of holy faces. He then traced back to Yu Yao, Shun, Yu, Tang, Wen, Wu, Zhou Gregorian, and the confirmation of Confucius' status, and then combed Confucius.Zengzi, Zi Si, Mencius' heart-to-heart legend, and the clues in the text of Mencius about the sages of the saints, have stimulated people to reconsider Zhu Xi's Taoism, to clarify the theory of good nature, to establish the connotation of Confucianism, to tie the two together, and to trace back to the source.Therefore, it can respond to the ideological trend and introspection of Confucianism since the Northern Song Dynasty, intensify the imagination of consecrated history, link each other between ancient and modern times, work and realm, and melt into one.Classical interpretation must return to the historical context, and even in the context of the Chinese side can see the mind of the annotator.There are many historical clues in the interpretation of justice, which is beyond doubt.Zhu Xi constructs the historical image of Confucian sages, expresses his ultimate feelings, and takes the responsibility of "Taoism" as his responsibility, which can arouse unparalleled emotion.
【作者單位】: 臺(tái)灣政治大學(xué)中文系;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:B244.7
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條
1 邢麗菊;;朝鮮朝時(shí)期“人物性同異”論爭(zhēng)的理論來(lái)源及其差異——巍巖李柬與南塘韓元震之人物性同異論比較[J];哲學(xué)研究;2008年11期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 陳逢源;;歷史意識(shí)與義理詮釋——以朱熹《四書(shū)章句集注》中“道統(tǒng)”觀為例[J];杭州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2017年03期
2 楊海文;;朱子學(xué)與朝鮮朝的未發(fā)之辨[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2015年07期
3 邢麗菊;;從中韓儒學(xué)的角度解析儒學(xué)的生態(tài)倫理[J];韓國(guó)學(xué)論文集;2012年00期
4 方旭東;;為何儒家不禁止殺生——從孟子的辯護(hù)談起[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2011年10期
5 邢麗菊;崔英辰;;從韓國(guó)儒學(xué)的角度解析儒學(xué)的生態(tài)倫理[J];東岳論叢;2011年03期
,本文編號(hào):1760284
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/1760284.html
教材專(zhuān)著