術前輔助性肝動脈化療栓塞對巨塊型肝癌預后的影響
[Abstract]:Objective: although the level of early diagnosis of primary liver cancer has been greatly improved at present, the onset of primary liver cancer is hidden, most of the patients were in the middle stage of the disease, and in the late stage, the diameter of the tumor has already belonged to the large liver cancer or even the massive liver cancer. For large-scale liver cancer, surgical treatment is preferred in most cases after surgical taboos are excluded. However, due to the high recurrence rate and poor prognosis, it is necessary to study how to improve the prognosis of massive liver cancer patients. By retrospective analysis, the liver function and survival time after surgical resection were followed up in patients with giant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the hepatic arterial chemoembolization (transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization,) in patients with giant hepatocellular carcinoma before and after operation. To evaluate the effect of preoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on the prognosis of massive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: a retrospective analysis was made on 31 cases of massive hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed pathologically as hepatocellular carcinoma in the Department of Hepatobiliary surgery, Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Xiamen University, from January 2010 to March 2015. The patients were divided into two groups: preoperative adjuvant TACE therapy combined with descending operation group and primary operation group. The general situation, treatment status and related clinical indexes were recorded. The influence of two treatment methods on prognosis was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test. Results: through clinical observation and follow-up,? The changes of hepatic tumor: in the preoperative adjuvant TACE therapy combined with descending operation group (n = 10), 8 cases (80%) had tumor volume significantly reduced after preoperative adjuvant TACE treatment. In 6 cases, the tumor size decreased from massive hepatocellular carcinoma to non-giant type liver cancer (10 cm), while in 2 cases after TACE treatment before operation, the tumor volume increased compared with that before TACE. There was no significant change in tumor volume in 6 cases, and no intrahepatic changes occurred after preoperative TACE treatment. Cases of extrahepatic metastasis. There were 8 cases (80%) of tumor necrosis in the preoperative adjuvant TACE therapy combined with descending operation group, in which the complete necrosis rate was 20% (2 / 10). The tumor necrosis rate was 4.8% (1 / 21) in the one-stage operation group, and there was significant difference between the two groups in tumor necrosis rate (P0.05). Perioperative period: preoperative adjuvant TACE therapy combined with reduced phase operation group and primary operation group, liver function before operation, 1 day after operation, There was no significant difference in liver function between the third day and the sixth day after operation (P0.05). There was no further deterioration of liver function or even liver failure after operation in both groups. There was no significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss and the drainage of abdominal cavity drainage between the patients of the preoperative adjuvant TACE group and the first-stage operation group (P 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the volume of intraoperative bleeding and the drainage volume of the peritoneal drainage tube 3 days after operation between the two groups (P0.05). Prognosis: there was significant difference in survival curve and tumor-free survival curve between preoperative adjuvant TACE therapy combined with operation group and one-stage operation group (P0.05). Conclusion: preoperative adjuvant TACE therapy can reduce the tumor size and increase the chance of resection, and may help to improve the tumor-free survival rate and overall survival rate. It does not cause significant damage to liver function and increase the difficulty of operation, and does not delay the recovery after operation.
【學位授予單位】:福建醫(yī)科大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2015
【分類號】:R735.7
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 劉汝才,劉鳳全,王俊山;抗癌飲治療巨塊型肝癌探討[J];黑龍江醫(yī)學;2002年10期
2 王興清,邵國良;中晚期巨塊型肝癌肝動脈化療栓塞治療分析[J];浙江臨床醫(yī)學;2005年09期
3 李育興,,黃東平;嬰兒巨塊型肝癌一例報告[J];贛南醫(yī)學院學報;1996年04期
4 傅振超,王學德,俞天生,曾凡本,呂湘蓮;老年肝尾葉巨塊型肝癌完全切除治愈1例[J];西北國防醫(yī)學雜志;2000年02期
5 丁曉芹,于衛(wèi)華,鄧士蘭;1例原發(fā)性巨塊型肝癌縮小后切除并發(fā)大出血的護理[J];現代護理;2001年01期
6 李明主,李定躍,李明,汪雪源,陳明良,王云良,李元洪,王金波,蔣存兵,胡義輝;以手術為主的綜合治療巨塊型肝癌的體會[J];中華外科雜志;2002年08期
7 郝繼輝,李強,俞鳴,焦振山,郝希山,郭曉靜;巨塊型肝癌的分型及其生物學行為的臨床與實驗研究[J];天津醫(yī)科大學學報;2002年02期
8 湯連喜,陳曉林,孫剛;巨塊型肝癌的介入治療[J];中國冶金工業(yè)醫(yī)學雜志;2002年05期
9 陳劉生;巨塊型肝癌術前經導管動脈灌注化療栓塞60例[J];鄭州大學學報(醫(yī)學版);2005年03期
10 宋明勛,申梅淑,關志鵬,孔令朝;單純灌注化療治療30例巨塊型肝癌的療效分析[J];現代腫瘤醫(yī)學;2005年03期
相關會議論文 前10條
1 黃華容;;巨塊型肝癌26例切除體會[A];第八屆全國肝癌學術會議論文匯編[C];2001年
2 賈建明;王齊原;林善華;;雙介入對原發(fā)巨塊型肝癌治療效果觀察[A];中華醫(yī)學會第一次全國介入醫(yī)學學術會議論文匯編[C];2001年
3 賈珍輝;喻峰;;原發(fā)性巨塊型肝癌雙介入治療的體會[A];2009中華醫(yī)學會影像技術分會第十七次全國學術大會論文集[C];2009年
4 于長鹿;祁兵;王濤;李津花;婁誠;;介入治療巨塊型肝癌伴肺靜脈瘺一例[A];中華醫(yī)學會第十三屆全國放射學大會論文匯編(下冊)[C];2006年
5 徐國斌;龍清云;劉駿方;;巨塊型肝癌合并不同類型肝動靜脈瘺的介入近期療效評價[A];2010湖北省腫瘤介入治療學術大會論文匯編[C];2010年
6 馮曉波;;門靜脈栓塞術在巨塊型肝癌綜合治療中的應用初探[A];2010湖北省腫瘤介入治療學術大會論文匯編[C];2010年
7 鄭國勤;胡偉;李爽;;介入療法結合適形放療在巨塊型肝癌治療中的臨床應用[A];湖北省抗癌協(xié)會腫瘤介入學專業(yè)委員會成立大會暨第一次腫瘤介入學術大會論文匯編[C];2009年
8 郭志;邢文閣;劉方;郭秀英;張晟;;12例巨塊型肝癌TACE聯合氬氦刀介入治療[A];第一屆中國腫瘤靶向治療技術大會論文集[C];2003年
9 張亮;劉紅海;;碘化油、無水乙醇分層栓塞法介入治療原發(fā)巨塊型肝癌的療效觀察[A];中國(第七屆)腫瘤微創(chuàng)治療學術大會暨世界影像導引下腫瘤微創(chuàng)治療學會成立籌備大會論文匯編[C];2011年
10 郭錚;王文輝;李奮強;;肝動脈TACE術結合氬氦刀治療中晚期巨塊型肝癌32例[A];第六屆西部介入放射學術會議寧夏醫(yī)學會放射學分會第四屆年會介入放射學新技術繼續(xù)教育學習班論文匯編[C];2009年
相關重要報紙文章 前1條
1 衣曉峰;晚期巨塊型肝癌患者生命可以延長[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2003年
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 吳志榮;術前輔助性肝動脈化療栓塞對巨塊型肝癌預后的影響[D];福建醫(yī)科大學;2015年
2 劉小亮;射波刀雙靶區(qū)治療巨塊型肝癌方法探討[D];大連醫(yī)科大學;2013年
3 劉雨貴;巨塊型肝癌多層螺旋CT與DSA的影像對比研究[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2013年
本文編號:2369711
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/zlx/2369711.html