本文選題：低劑量輻射 + 正常肺上皮細(xì)胞��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：目的:本研究以人肺上皮細(xì)胞HBE135-E6E7(HBE)及人肺腺癌細(xì)胞A549為研究對(duì)象,探討ATM相關(guān)信號(hào)通路在LDR誘導(dǎo)這兩種細(xì)胞生物學(xué)效應(yīng)差異中的作用及相關(guān)分子機(jī)制。方法:1.通過(guò)WST-1及平板克隆形成實(shí)驗(yàn)檢測(cè)HBE及A549兩種細(xì)胞在LDR作用前后生存活性的變化。2.通過(guò)PI單染流式細(xì)胞術(shù)檢測(cè)HBE及A549兩種細(xì)胞在LDR作用前后細(xì)胞周期分布變化情況。3.通過(guò)Annexin V-FITC/PI雙染和JC-1染色流式細(xì)胞術(shù)檢測(cè)HBE及A549兩種細(xì)胞在LDR序貫HDR處理后存活率和線粒體膜電位變化情況;同時(shí)通過(guò)DCFH-DA探針檢測(cè)各組細(xì)胞內(nèi)ROS水平變化。4.通過(guò)Real-time q PCR方法檢測(cè)HBE及A549兩種細(xì)胞在LDR作用前后抗氧化物NQO1及HO-1表達(dá)變化。5.通過(guò)Western blot方法檢測(cè)HBE及A549兩種細(xì)胞在LDR作用前后ATM/p ATM、AKT/p AKT、GSK-3β/p GSK-3β、CDK4、CDK6、cyclin D1、Nrf2、NQO1及HO-1的表達(dá)變化。6.通過(guò)ATM si RNA轉(zhuǎn)染或caffeine處理明確ATM相關(guān)信號(hào)通路在LDR誘導(dǎo)HBE及A549細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生生物學(xué)效應(yīng)差異中的作用。結(jié)果:1.LDR能夠誘導(dǎo)HBE細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生興奮性效應(yīng),而在A549細(xì)胞中無(wú)此效應(yīng)在劑量效應(yīng)研究中,我們發(fā)現(xiàn):20-100 m Gy的X線能夠明顯刺激HBE細(xì)胞增殖,其中75 m Gy刺激增殖的效應(yīng)最為明顯;然而,在20-200 m Gy的劑量范圍內(nèi),A549細(xì)胞的增殖率并沒(méi)有明顯改變。而當(dāng)輻射劑量超過(guò)200 m Gy時(shí),兩種細(xì)胞的增殖均受到顯著的抑制。在LDR的時(shí)間效應(yīng)研究中,HBE細(xì)胞在75 m Gy照射后24-72 h較對(duì)照組增殖率明顯增加,而A549細(xì)胞在LDR后這些時(shí)間點(diǎn)增殖率無(wú)明顯變化。進(jìn)一步應(yīng)用平板克隆形成實(shí)驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn):HBE細(xì)胞在LDR后10天集落形成數(shù)量較對(duì)照組明顯增多,而A549細(xì)胞在LDR前后集落形成數(shù)量無(wú)明顯變化。應(yīng)用流式細(xì)胞術(shù)檢測(cè)了75 m Gy X線照射后24 h時(shí)兩種細(xì)胞在各細(xì)胞周期中的分布比例。結(jié)果顯示:HBE細(xì)胞在LDR后24 h時(shí)S期細(xì)胞較對(duì)照組比例升高了1.67倍,同時(shí)伴隨G0/G1期細(xì)胞比例下降了1.32倍。相比之下,我們并沒(méi)有觀察到A549細(xì)胞在LDR前后各周期細(xì)胞比例有明顯變化。2.LDR能夠誘導(dǎo)HBE細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生適應(yīng)性反應(yīng),而在A549細(xì)胞中無(wú)此效應(yīng)將細(xì)胞分成4組:對(duì)照組(假照組),D1(75 m Gy),D2(5 Gy)及D1+D2(75m Gy+5Gy)。應(yīng)用DCFH-DA探針檢測(cè)各組細(xì)胞內(nèi)ROS水平變化情況。結(jié)果顯示:與對(duì)照組相比,D2組HBE細(xì)胞及A549細(xì)胞內(nèi)ROS水平顯著升高。然而,當(dāng)預(yù)先給予D1處理時(shí),在HBE細(xì)胞中,D1+D2組ROS水平較D2組明顯下降;而在A549細(xì)胞中,D1+D2組ROS水平較D2組無(wú)明顯變化。進(jìn)一步應(yīng)用JC-1探針檢測(cè)4組細(xì)胞線粒體膜電位的變化,以及流式細(xì)胞術(shù)檢測(cè)4組細(xì)胞的凋亡變化情況。結(jié)果顯示:與對(duì)照組相比,D2組HBE及A549細(xì)胞線粒體膜電位明顯下降。然而,當(dāng)預(yù)先給予D1處理時(shí),在HBE細(xì)胞中,D1+D2組線粒體膜電位水平較D2組顯著升高;而在A549細(xì)胞中,D1+D2組線粒體膜電位水平較D2組無(wú)明顯變化。流式細(xì)胞術(shù)檢測(cè)各組細(xì)胞凋亡變化情況與線粒體膜電位變化趨勢(shì)一致3.ATM及AKT參與LDR誘導(dǎo)HBE細(xì)胞興奮性效應(yīng)的產(chǎn)生,而在A549細(xì)胞中無(wú)此效應(yīng)應(yīng)用western blot方法檢測(cè)了ATM及其下游分子AKT的磷酸化水平,結(jié)果顯示:與對(duì)照組相比,HBE細(xì)胞在75 m Gy X線照射后24 h時(shí)ATM及AKT的磷酸化水平顯著升高,但ATM及ATK總蛋白水平無(wú)明顯變化。然而,在A549細(xì)胞中,ATM及AKT蛋白磷酸化水平及總蛋白水平均未受到LDR的影響。應(yīng)用caffeine或ATM si RNA在LDR前預(yù)先處理細(xì)胞后,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)在HBE細(xì)胞中,caffeine或ATM si RNA的加入能夠抑制LDR誘導(dǎo)的ATM活化及AKT磷酸化表達(dá);而在A549細(xì)胞中,無(wú)論是否應(yīng)用caffeine或ATM si RNA處理,LDR均未影響ATM及AKT的磷酸化水平。隨后,我們應(yīng)用WST-1法檢測(cè)了caffeine及ATM si RNA處理前后LDR對(duì)HBE及A549細(xì)胞增殖率的影響。結(jié)果顯示:在HBE細(xì)胞中,加入caffeine或轉(zhuǎn)染ATM si RNA都能夠消除LDR對(duì)細(xì)胞的促增殖效應(yīng);而在A549細(xì)胞中,加入caffeine或轉(zhuǎn)染ATM si RNA都沒(méi)有改變細(xì)胞的增殖率。4.LDR通過(guò)激活A(yù)TM/AKT/GSK-3β通路促進(jìn)HBE細(xì)胞內(nèi)CDK4/CDK6/cyclin D1表達(dá),而在A549細(xì)胞中無(wú)此效應(yīng)應(yīng)用western blot方法檢測(cè)了LDR后24 h時(shí)CDK4,CDK6及cyclin D1的表達(dá)變化,同時(shí)也檢測(cè)了AKT及GSK-3β磷酸化水平的變化情況。在HBE細(xì)胞中,GSK-3β磷酸化水平、CDK4、CDK6及cyclin D1的表達(dá)在LDR后明顯升高;應(yīng)用AKT抑制劑LY294002處理細(xì)胞抑制AKT的功能時(shí),LDR誘導(dǎo)GSK-3β磷酸化水平、CDK4、CDK6及cyclin D1的表達(dá)水平升高的效應(yīng)被明顯削弱。在A549細(xì)胞中,無(wú)論是否預(yù)先給予LY294002處理細(xì)胞,LDR對(duì)GSK-3β磷酸化水平、CDK4、CDK6及cyclin D1的表達(dá)水平均無(wú)明顯影響。5.LDR能夠誘導(dǎo)HBE細(xì)胞Nrf2核積聚,調(diào)節(jié)抗氧化物m RNA表達(dá),而在A549細(xì)胞中無(wú)此效應(yīng)應(yīng)用實(shí)時(shí)定量PCR方法檢測(cè)LDR后Nrf2下游調(diào)節(jié)的抗氧化物NQO1及HO-1在m RNA水平的表達(dá)變化。我們發(fā)現(xiàn),在HBE細(xì)胞中,NQO1及HO-1 m RNA表達(dá)水平在LDR組較對(duì)照組明顯升高;而在A549細(xì)胞中,NQO1及HO-1 m RNA表達(dá)水平在LDR前后均無(wú)明顯變化。應(yīng)用caffeine及ATM si MRA預(yù)先處理兩種細(xì)胞后我們發(fā)現(xiàn),預(yù)先應(yīng)用caffeine或ATM si RNA處理細(xì)胞都會(huì)削弱LDR在HBE細(xì)胞中誘導(dǎo)NQO1及HO-1 m RNA表達(dá)升高的效應(yīng);而在A549細(xì)胞中,無(wú)上述效應(yīng)發(fā)生。6.LDR通過(guò)ATM/AKT/GSK-3β通路激活HBE細(xì)胞抗氧化反應(yīng),而在A549細(xì)胞中無(wú)此效應(yīng)應(yīng)用western blot方法檢測(cè)LDR后24 h時(shí)細(xì)胞內(nèi)ATM、AKT、GSK-3β磷酸化水平的表達(dá)變化,胞漿、胞核內(nèi)Nrf2蛋白以及NQO1、HO-1蛋白的表達(dá)變化。結(jié)果顯示:在HBE細(xì)胞中,與對(duì)照組相比,LDR組細(xì)胞胞核內(nèi)Nrf2蛋白及其調(diào)節(jié)的抗氧化物NQO1及HO-1表達(dá)明顯升高,這與ATM、AKT、GSK-3β磷酸化水平變化的趨勢(shì)一致;而在A549細(xì)胞中,上述蛋白表達(dá)水平均未受到LDR的影響。應(yīng)用caffeine預(yù)先處理細(xì)胞,或ATM si RNA預(yù)先轉(zhuǎn)染細(xì)胞,我們發(fā)現(xiàn):在HBE細(xì)胞中,caffeine及ATM si RNA處理均可以抑制LDR誘導(dǎo)胞核Nrf2蛋白及NQO1及HO-1表達(dá)升高的效應(yīng),且這一結(jié)果與ATM、AKT、GSK-3β磷酸化水平變化的趨勢(shì)一致;而在A549細(xì)胞中,我們并沒(méi)有觀察到上述效應(yīng)的發(fā)生。為了驗(yàn)證ATM在LDR誘導(dǎo)HBE細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生保護(hù)效應(yīng)中的作用,我們應(yīng)用ATM si RNA轉(zhuǎn)染細(xì)胞24 h后,給予75 m Gy X線照射后24時(shí)序貫5 Gy X線照射處理,在照射后24 h后利用WST-1方法檢測(cè)各組細(xì)胞增殖率的變化情況。結(jié)果顯示,在HBE細(xì)胞中,預(yù)先應(yīng)用ATM si RNA轉(zhuǎn)染細(xì)胞,能夠顯著抑制LDR對(duì)序貫HDR殺傷細(xì)胞的保護(hù)效應(yīng)。結(jié)論:1.LDR能夠誘導(dǎo)正常肺上皮細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生興奮性效應(yīng)及適應(yīng)性反應(yīng),而在肺腺癌細(xì)胞中沒(méi)有誘導(dǎo)上述效應(yīng)的發(fā)生。2.LDR誘導(dǎo)生物學(xué)效應(yīng)的差異與ATM相關(guān)的促增殖信號(hào)通路及抗氧化反應(yīng)機(jī)制相關(guān)。在正常細(xì)胞中,LDR能夠激活A(yù)TM蛋白是其誘導(dǎo)興奮效應(yīng)發(fā)生的始發(fā)事件。3.在正常細(xì)胞內(nèi),由LDR活化的ATM蛋白能夠通過(guò)激活其下游的AKT/GSK-3β信號(hào)通路促進(jìn)CDK4/CDK6/cyclin D1的表達(dá),誘導(dǎo)正常細(xì)胞興奮性效應(yīng)的發(fā)生,而在腫瘤細(xì)胞中無(wú)此效應(yīng)。4.在正常細(xì)胞內(nèi),由LDR激活的ATM/AKT/GSK-3β信號(hào)通路也可以促進(jìn)Nrf2向細(xì)胞核內(nèi)轉(zhuǎn)移,增加其下游抗氧化物NQO1及HO-1的表達(dá),誘導(dǎo)適應(yīng)性反應(yīng)的發(fā)生,而在腫瘤細(xì)胞中無(wú)此效應(yīng)。本研究基于LDR的生物學(xué)效應(yīng),探討了一種LDR序貫HDR的腫瘤治療新模式的可行性,以期提高腫瘤放療劑量,進(jìn)而提高療效,同時(shí)又能減輕正常組織的損傷。LDR對(duì)腫瘤細(xì)胞是否存在興奮性效應(yīng)和適應(yīng)性反應(yīng)是LDR臨床應(yīng)用的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)。本研究發(fā)現(xiàn)LDR對(duì)腫瘤細(xì)胞及正常細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生的生物學(xué)效應(yīng)存在差異,并從細(xì)胞增殖、細(xì)胞周期、細(xì)胞信號(hào)傳導(dǎo)通路、抗氧化應(yīng)激反應(yīng)等方面進(jìn)行了LDR生物學(xué)效應(yīng)差異機(jī)制的對(duì)比研究。研究成果將為L(zhǎng)DR的臨床應(yīng)用奠定理論及實(shí)驗(yàn)基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:Objective: the purpose of this study was to investigate the role of ATM related signaling pathway in the differentiation of these two cell biological effects and the related molecular mechanisms of human lung epithelial cell HBE135-E6E7 (HBE) and human lung adenocarcinoma cell A549. Methods: 1. through the formation of WST-1 and flat clones, two cells of HBE and A549 were tested before the action of LDR. The changes of the viability of.2. by PI single dye flow cytometry were used to detect the changes of cell cycle distribution of HBE and A549 two cells before and after the action of LDR.3. through Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining and JC-1 staining flow cytometry to detect the survival rate and the change of the membrane potential of HBE and A549 two cells after LDR sequential treatment. Detection of ROS level changes in each cell by A probe.4. through Real-time Q PCR method to detect HBE and A549 two kinds of cells before and after the action of LDR NQO1 and HO-1. The expression of -1 changes.6. through ATM Si RNA transfection or caffeine treatment to clarify the role of ATM related signaling pathway in the biological effects of LDR induced HBE and A549 cells. The proliferation of HBE cells was significantly stimulated, and the proliferation effect of 75 m Gy stimulation was most obvious; however, the proliferation rate of A549 cells was not significantly changed in the dose range of 20-200 m Gy. The proliferation of two cells was significantly inhibited when the radiation dose exceeded 200 m Gy. In the time effect study of LDR, HBE cells were in 75 m Gy. The proliferation rate of 24-72 h was significantly higher than that of the control group, but the proliferation rate of A549 cells at these time points was not significantly changed after LDR. Further application of flat clones found that the number of colony formation in HBE cells increased significantly at the 10 day after LDR, but the number of colony formation in A549 cells before and after LDR was not significantly changed. The distribution ratio of two cells in each cell cycle at 24 h after 75 m Gy X ray irradiation was measured. The results showed that the proportion of S phase cells in HBE cells was 1.67 times higher than that of the control group at 24 h after LDR, and the proportion of cells in G0/G1 phase decreased by 1.32 times. .2.LDR could induce HBE cells to induce adaptive response, but in A549 cells, the cells were divided into 4 groups without this effect: the control group (false group), D1 (75 m Gy), D2 (5 Gy) and D1+D2 (75m Gy+5Gy). The level of intracellular ROS increased significantly. However, when D1 was given in advance, the level of ROS in group D1+D2 decreased significantly in HBE cells, but in A549 cells, the ROS level of D1+D2 group was not significantly higher than that in the D2 group. Further, JC-1 probe was used to detect the changes in the mitochondrial membrane potential of 4 groups of cells, and the changes of apoptosis in 4 groups of cells were detected by flow cytometry. The results showed that the mitochondrial membrane potential of HBE and A549 cells in the D2 group decreased significantly compared with the control group. However, the mitochondrial membrane potential level in the D1+D2 group was significantly higher than that in the D2 group when the D1 was given in advance, while in A549 cells, the mitochondrial membrane potential level of the D1+D2 group was not significantly higher than that in the D2 group. Flow cytometry was used to detect each group in A549 cells. The changes of apoptosis and mitochondrial membrane potential are consistent with the trend of mitochondrial membrane potential change, 3.ATM and AKT participate in the production of excitatory effects induced by LDR in HBE cells, while Western blot method is used in A549 cells to detect the phosphorylation level of AKT in ATM and its downstream molecules. The results show that, compared with those in the group, the HBE cells are 24 after 75 m Gy. The phosphorylation level of ATM and AKT increased significantly, but there was no significant change in the total protein level of ATM and ATK. However, the phosphorylation level and total protein level of ATM and AKT proteins were not affected by LDR in A549 cells. LDR induced ATM activation and AKT phosphorylation were inhibited, but in A549 cells, no matter whether caffeine or ATM Si RNA treated, LDR did not affect the phosphorylation level of ATM and AKT. The addition of caffeine or transfection of ATM Si RNA can eliminate the proliferation effect of LDR on cells, but in A549 cells, the addition of caffeine or ATM Si RNA does not change the proliferation rate of the cells. The OT method detected the expression of CDK4, CDK6 and cyclin D1 at 24 h after LDR, and also detected the changes in the level of AKT and GSK-3 beta phosphorylation. The effects of elevated levels of acidification, CDK4, CDK6 and cyclin D1 were significantly weakened. In A549 cells, LDR has no significant effects on the level of GSK-3 beta phosphorylation, CDK4, CDK6, and cyclin D1, regardless of whether or not it is pre given to LY294002 cells. We found that the expression of NQO1 and HO-1 at the m RNA level in the Nrf2 downstream of LDR after LDR was detected by real-time quantitative PCR method without this effect. We found that the expression level of NQO1 and HO-1 m in HBE cells was significantly higher than that in the control group in HBE cells. After two cells were pretreated with caffeine and ATM Si MRA, we found that pre application of caffeine or ATM Si RNA processing cells could weaken the effect of LDR in HBE cells to induce NQO1 and HO-1 to increase expression. The changes in the expression of ATM, AKT, GSK-3 beta phosphorylation, cytoplasm, Nrf2 protein and NQO1, HO-1 protein in the cell nucleus were detected in A549 cells without the effect of Western blot in A549 cells. The results showed that in the HBE cells, compared with the control group, the protein and its regulation of oxygen resistance in the cells were compared with the control group. The expression of NQO1 and HO-1 increased obviously, which was in accordance with the trend of ATM, AKT, GSK-3 beta phosphorylation, but in A549 cells, the expression level of these proteins was not affected by LDR. LDR induced the increase in the expression of Nrf2 protein and NQO1 and HO-1, and this result is in accordance with the trend of ATM, AKT, GSK-3 beta phosphorylation. In A549 cells, we did not observe the above effect. In order to verify the effect of ATM on LDR induced HBE cells, we used ATM to transfect cells 2 After 4 h, 75 m Gy X ray irradiation was given at 24 hours after 5 Gy X ray irradiation, and the cell proliferation rate of each group was detected by WST-1 method after 24 h after irradiation. The results showed that the pre application of ATM Si RNA transfected cells in HBE cells could significantly inhibit the protective effect of LDR on the sequential HDR killer cells. There is an exciting and adaptive response in normal lung epithelial cells, but the difference in.2.LDR induced biological effects in the lung adenocarcinoma cells is related to the ATM related proliferation signaling pathway and the mechanism of antioxidant response. In normal cells, LDR can stimulate the activation of ATM protein as the beginning of its induced excitation effect. In normal cells, the ATM protein activated by LDR can promote the expression of CDK4/CDK6/cyclin D1 by activating the AKT/GSK-3 beta signaling pathway in the downstream, inducing the occurrence of the normal cell excitatory effect, while the.4. in the tumor cells is not in the normal cell, and the ATM/AKT/GSK-3 beta signaling pathway activated by LDR can also promote N in the normal cells. The ATM/AKT/GSK-3 beta signaling pathway activated by LDR can also promote N in the normal cells. The ATM activation of the ATM/AKT/GSK-3 beta pathway in the tumor cells can also promote N. The transfer of RF2 into the nucleus increases the expression of the downstream antioxidants, NQO1 and HO-1, and induces the occurrence of adaptive response, but has no effect in the tumor cells. Based on the biological effects of LDR, this study explored the feasibility of a new mode of LDR sequential HDR for tumor treatment, in order to improve the dose of tumor radiotherapy, and then improve the curative effect, and at the same time It is a key link in the clinical application of LDR to reduce the excitatory and adaptive response of.LDR to tumor cells. This study found that the biological effects of LDR on tumor cells and normal cells were different, and from cell proliferation, cell cycle, cell signal transduction pathway, antioxidant stress response and so on. A comparative study on the mechanism of LDR biological effects was conducted. The research results will lay a theoretical and experimental foundation for the clinical application of LDR.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：R734.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王瑾;胡紹明;;廚房空氣污染對(duì)肺巨噬細(xì)胞細(xì)胞毒效應(yīng)的影響[J];中國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)報(bào);1992年05期

2 汪浩勇;抗壞血酸與相關(guān)自由基細(xì)胞毒效應(yīng)的機(jī)理[J];消毒與滅菌;1989年03期

3 王一婷;雷云;黃鸝;謝奎;楊依麗;陳寶瓊;謝秋玲;洪岸;熊盛;;表達(dá)TNFR-Fc的重組CHO細(xì)胞旋轉(zhuǎn)振蕩培養(yǎng)工藝的放大及其活性檢測(cè)[J];中國(guó)生物制品學(xué)雜志;2012年05期

4 徐英含;龔蕓;李保玉;張洪福;周健;;鎘、鉛、亞硫酸鹽等對(duì)巨噬細(xì)胞介導(dǎo)的細(xì)胞毒效應(yīng)影響的研究[J];浙江醫(yī)學(xué);1991年05期

5 方佳,盧芳,陳常慶;人腫瘤壞死因子受體75在人腫瘤壞死因子α介導(dǎo)的細(xì)胞毒效應(yīng)中的雙重功能(英文)[J];Acta Pharmacologica Sinica;2001年11期

6 董力;張宏偉;;對(duì)羥基苯甲酸酯的細(xì)胞毒效應(yīng)[J];職業(yè)與健康;2010年12期

7 李云波;喬賜彬;;化學(xué)物質(zhì)對(duì)K細(xì)胞和NK細(xì)胞功能的影響[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué)(衛(wèi)生學(xué)分冊(cè));1988年01期

8 張建華;陳紅;張秀芹;許曉群;王寶紅;高春義;王郡甫;;蘇木素染色法在細(xì)胞介導(dǎo)的細(xì)胞毒效應(yīng)中的應(yīng)用[J];免疫學(xué)雜志;2010年06期

9 朱俊,鄭芳,李琳蕓,馮瑋,姜小丹,李卓婭;死亡結(jié)構(gòu)域沉默子參與兩型TNF-α胞毒效應(yīng)機(jī)制的研究[J];免疫學(xué)雜志;2004年05期

10 王海濱,郭峰;紅細(xì)胞產(chǎn)生的NK細(xì)胞增強(qiáng)因子及其生物學(xué)作用[J];國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué)(腫瘤學(xué)分冊(cè));1999年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前4條

1 鞠q，

本文編號(hào)：2030183