本文選題：中重度持續(xù)性　切入點(diǎn)：變應(yīng)性鼻炎　出處：《南京大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目的：通過鼻激發(fā)試驗(yàn)(Nasal Provocation Test, NPT)、支氣管激發(fā)試驗(yàn)(Bronchial Provocation Test, BPT)及鼻灌洗、誘導(dǎo)痰嗜酸性粒細(xì)胞(eosinophils, EOS)計(jì)數(shù),分析中重度持續(xù)性變應(yīng)性鼻炎(Allergic Rhinitis, AR)患者鼻與下氣道炎癥特征。 方法：對(duì)80名正常對(duì)照組、101名中重度持續(xù)性AR患者行NPT、BPT及鼻灌洗、誘導(dǎo)痰EOS計(jì)數(shù)。 結(jié)果： 1、AR組基礎(chǔ)肺功能(FVC、FEV1)與對(duì)照組相比,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(p0.05)； 2、AR組NPT陽(yáng)性率為75.2%(76/101),與對(duì)照組42.5%(34/80)相比,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(x2=20.081, p=0.000); 3、AR組BPT陽(yáng)性率為14.9%(15/101),與對(duì)照組2.5%(2/80)相比,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(x2=8.003,p0.05), 4、鼻灌洗EOS數(shù)量為22.09±85.3,對(duì)照組為0.41±1.27,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=-10.469,p0.01)； 5、AR組誘導(dǎo)痰EOS數(shù)量為11.02±18.22,對(duì)照組為(1.62±2.88)相比,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=-5.648,p0.01), 6、AR組鼻與下氣道EOS水平存在相關(guān)性(r=0.31,p0.01)。結(jié)論： 1、中重度持續(xù)性AR患者基礎(chǔ)肺功能較正常人無明顯改變； 2、AR患者鼻與下氣道呈現(xiàn)明顯的高反應(yīng)性； 3、AR患者鼻與下氣道存在顯著增高的EOS浸潤(rùn)； 4、AR以鼻與下氣道EOS浸潤(rùn)及反應(yīng)性增高為炎癥特征； 5、AR上下氣道炎癥具有一致性； 6、建議AR患者檢查下氣道炎癥狀況,有異常者應(yīng)早期進(jìn)行下氣道干預(yù)。
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze nasal and inferior airway inflammation in patients with moderate and severe persistent allergic rhinitis (ARs) by nasal stimulation test, nasal stimulation test, bronchial Provocation test and nasal lavage, and count of eosinophils (EOS) in induced sputum eosinophilus (eosinophilus). Methods: 101 patients with moderate or severe persistent AR were treated with NPT, nasal lavage and induced sputum EOS count. Results:. (1) compared with the control group, there was no significant difference in the basic lung function between the AR group and the control group (P 0.05). 2the positive rate of NPT in AR group was 75.2% / 101%, which was significantly higher than that in control group (42.5%) (20.081%) and 0.000% (P < 0.05). 3The positive rate of BPT in AR group was 14. 9% / 101%, which was significantly higher than that in control group (2. 5% / 80). (4) the number of EOS in nasal lavage was 22.09 鹵85.3, that in control group was 0.41 鹵1.27, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The number of induced sputum EOS was 11.02 鹵18.22 in AR group and 1.62 鹵2.88 in control group. There was a correlation between the EOS level of nasal and lower airway in 6patients with AR. Conclusion:. 1. There was no significant change in basic pulmonary function in moderate and severe persistent AR patients compared with normal controls. 2the nasal and inferior airway showed obvious hyperresponsiveness in patients with AR. 3There were significantly increased EOS infiltration in nose and lower airway in patients with AR. 4AR was characterized by EOS infiltration and increased reactivity in the nasal and lower airway. 5the inflammation of upper and lower airway of AR is consistent; 6. It is suggested that AR patients should check for lower airway inflammation, and early intervention should be carried out in patients with abnormal airway.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：R765.21

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陽(yáng)玉萍;張華;;變應(yīng)性鼻炎患者下呼吸道反應(yīng)性分析[J];中國(guó)耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科;2010年12期

2 劉曉芳;王向東;王楊;趙巖;孫永昌;張羅;;變應(yīng)性鼻炎患者潛在哮喘和下氣道高反應(yīng)的篩查研究[J];中國(guó)耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科;2012年08期

3 王秋萍,李澤卿,王天友,湯健,程向榮,周文光;下鼻甲位置不良對(duì)鼻通氣功能的影響[J];醫(yī)學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2002年05期

4 張勇;王秋萍;;神經(jīng)炎癥在上下氣道變態(tài)反應(yīng)性疾病中的作用[J];醫(yī)學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

5 韓錦華;王彤;臧洪瑞;劉承耀;王鴻;張永杰;李譜;;鼻聲反射和鼻腔測(cè)壓評(píng)價(jià)鼻中隔矯正術(shù)對(duì)雙側(cè)鼻腔的影響[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科雜志;2009年12期

6 范雪潔;林鵬;孫沛ng;時(shí)文杰;張金梅;魏先鋒;張玉庚;畢靜;米悅;;天津地區(qū)健康成年人鼻通氣功能的客觀評(píng)估[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科雜志;2010年14期

7 張虹;李曉明;肖淑芬;裴士庚;劉月梅;;兒童腺樣體肥大所致鼻氣道阻塞的客觀評(píng)估[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科雜志;2010年23期

8 何金年;譚建成;姚東方;李杰恩;;鼻內(nèi)類固醇激素對(duì)變應(yīng)性鼻炎動(dòng)物模型鼻腔黏膜的影響[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科雜志;2012年02期

9 龐新舉;王秋萍;;鼻腔測(cè)壓法測(cè)量鼻氣道阻力及其應(yīng)用進(jìn)展[J];醫(yī)學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2012年11期

10 徐定遠(yuǎn);李澤卿;吳波;張勇;季俊峰;薛飛;王秋萍;;上氣道變應(yīng)炎癥對(duì)下氣道的影響[J];山東大學(xué)耳鼻喉眼學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1612290