發(fā)布時間：2019-07-14 19:09

【摘要】：目的比較鼻內(nèi)鏡下低溫等離子與傳統(tǒng)方式(經(jīng)齒齦溝徑路)行鼻前庭囊腫切除的臨床療效觀察分析。方法選取青海大學(xué)附屬醫(yī)院耳鼻咽喉科2010年1月-2016年1月經(jīng)手術(shù)治療的鼻前庭囊腫患者68例,并將其按照隨機(jī)分組的方式分為對照組和實(shí)驗(yàn)組,其中對照組34例,實(shí)驗(yàn)組34例。對照組患者采取傳統(tǒng)方式(經(jīng)齒齦溝徑路)行囊腫切除,實(shí)驗(yàn)組采取鼻內(nèi)鏡下低溫等離子方式行囊腫切除。比較兩組患者手術(shù)時間、術(shù)中出血情況、術(shù)后疼痛情況、術(shù)后傷口愈合時間及手術(shù)并發(fā)癥等。結(jié)果實(shí)驗(yàn)組手術(shù)時間、術(shù)中出血量、術(shù)后疼痛及傷口愈合時間均優(yōu)于對照組(P0.05),手術(shù)并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率明顯低于對照組(P0.05)。結(jié)論鼻內(nèi)鏡下低溫等離子術(shù)治療鼻前庭囊腫具有痛苦少、創(chuàng)傷小、療效好和并發(fā)癥少等優(yōu)點(diǎn),值得臨床應(yīng)用及推廣。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the clinical efficacy of endoscopic hypothermic plasma and traditional (via gum crevicular approach) in the resection of nasal vestibule cysts. Methods from January 2010 to January 2016, 68 patients with nasal vestibule cysts were randomly divided into control group (n = 34) and experimental group (n = 34), which were randomly divided into control group (n = 34) and experimental group (n = 34), which were randomly divided into control group (n = 34) and experimental group (n = 34). The patients in the control group were resected by traditional way (via gum crevicular approach), and the cysts in the experimental group were resected by low temperature plasma under nasal endoscope. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, postoperative wound healing time and surgical complications were compared between the two groups. Results the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain and wound healing time in the experimental group were better than those in the control group (P 0.05), and the incidence of operative complications was significantly lower than that in the control group (P 0.05). Conclusion endoscopic hypothermic plasma has the advantages of less pain, less trauma, good curative effect and less complications, which is worthy of clinical application and popularization.
【作者單位】： 青海大學(xué)附屬醫(yī)院耳鼻咽喉科;
【分類號】：R765.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王衛(wèi)紅,白國榮;經(jīng)鼻內(nèi)進(jìn)路行鼻前庭囊腫揭蓋術(shù)[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉科雜志;2002年08期

2 李德宏,胡麗;揭蓋法治療鼻前庭囊腫152例報(bào)告[J];中國耳鼻咽喉顱底外科雜志;2004年01期

3 陳子松,林琳,覃多錄;內(nèi)鏡下經(jīng)鼻前庭切除鼻前庭囊腫[J];中華耳鼻咽喉科雜志;2004年10期

4 張連忠,連政營,劉建國;家族鼻前庭囊腫4例報(bào)告[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉科雜志;2005年14期

5 伍保均;揚(yáng)紅;鐘惠玲;;揭蓋法治療鼻前庭囊腫56例分析[J];實(shí)用診斷與治療雜志;2006年01期

6 于曉偉;鄒佳霖;王其友;;彩色多普勒超聲掃描對鼻前庭囊腫的診斷價值[J];中國醫(yī)師進(jìn)修雜志;2006年27期

7 李福軍;楊蓓蓓;王海軍;;鼻前庭囊腫發(fā)生機(jī)制的探討[J];臨床耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科雜志;2007年02期

8 孫煥然;張雪峰;;經(jīng)鼻前庭內(nèi)鏡下切除鼻前庭囊腫[J];中國實(shí)用醫(yī)藥;2008年05期

9 孫文青;劉運(yùn)春;;減壓微創(chuàng)切除治療鼻前庭囊腫14例臨床觀察[J];中國民族民間醫(yī)藥;2009年16期

10 于衛(wèi)華;;經(jīng)鼻前庭切口治療鼻前庭囊腫26例臨床觀察[J];哈爾濱醫(yī)藥;2009年06期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 何勇;;經(jīng)鼻進(jìn)路揭蓋法治療鼻前庭囊腫51例臨床分析[A];2006年浙江省耳鼻咽喉科學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2006年

2 李勇;陶寶鴻;江波;蔡志毅;;鼻內(nèi)鏡下鼻前庭囊腫揭蓋術(shù)16例臨床分析[A];浙江省醫(yī)學(xué)會耳鼻咽喉科學(xué)分會成立60周年慶典暨2011年浙江省醫(yī)學(xué)會耳鼻咽喉頭頸外科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2011年

，

本文編號：2514455