本文選題：老年性白內(nèi)障　切入點(diǎn)：人工晶狀體　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目的: 研究Aurium變色人工晶狀體對(duì)術(shù)后對(duì)比敏感度和眩光對(duì)比敏感度的影響。 方法: 1.選取我院2010年8月至2011年4月行白內(nèi)障超聲乳化聯(lián)合人工晶狀體植入術(shù)后患者,且隨訪資料完整的病例70例(眼),其中37例為Aurium(model400)變色人工晶狀體組,33例為黃色藍(lán)光濾過型IQ(SN60WF)人工晶狀體組。 2.研究觀察老年性白內(nèi)障患者術(shù)后3個(gè)月時(shí)的裸眼視力（UCVA），最佳矯正視力（BCVA），在85cd/m2(明適應(yīng))和3cd/m2(暗適應(yīng))條件下的對(duì)比敏感度（CS）和眩光對(duì)比敏感度(GS)。 結(jié)果: 1. Aurium變色人工晶狀體組和黃色藍(lán)光濾過型IQ組患者術(shù)后3個(gè)月時(shí)的裸眼視力和最佳矯正視力,兩組比較差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05）。 2.在暗適應(yīng)眩光條件下，Aurium變色人工晶狀體組的眩光對(duì)比敏感度在空間頻率為3cpd和6cpd時(shí)要優(yōu)于黃色藍(lán)光濾過型IQ組，，差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05），而在其他空間頻率的差異無統(tǒng)學(xué)意義（P0.05）。Aurium變色人工晶狀體組和黃色藍(lán)光濾過型IQ組在明適應(yīng)、明適應(yīng)眩光、暗適應(yīng)條件下,兩組之間的對(duì)比敏感度和眩光對(duì)比敏感度差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P0.05）。 結(jié)論: 1. Aurium變色人工晶狀體組在暗適應(yīng)眩光條件下，空間頻率為3cpd、6cpd時(shí)的眩光對(duì)比敏感度要優(yōu)于黃色藍(lán)光濾過型IQ人工晶狀體組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。 2.植入Aurium變色人工晶狀體組患者術(shù)后的視力與黃色藍(lán)光濾過型IQ人工晶狀體組的視力差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
[Abstract]:Objective:. To study the effect of Aurium discoloration intraocular lens on contrast sensitivity and glare contrast sensitivity after operation. Methods:. 1. The patients who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation from August 2010 to April 2011 in our hospital were selected. There were 70 cases with complete follow-up data (including 37 cases with Auriumn model 400), 33 cases with yellow blue light filtered IQT SN60WF intraocular lens group (33 cases) with color change intraocular lens group (Aurium model 400), and 33 cases were treated with yellow blue light filter type IQT SN60WF intraocular lens group. 2. To observe the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity (CSS) and glare contrast sensitivity (GSH) at 85 cm / m 2 and 3 CD / m 2 (dark adaptation) in senile cataract patients 3 months after operation. Results:. 1. The uncorrected visual acuity and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of Aurium and yellow blue light filter IQ group were 3 months after operation. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). 2. The contrast sensitivity of glare in the Aurium discoloration IOL group was better than that in the yellow blue light filter IQ group when the spatial frequency was 3cpd and 6cpd. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), but there was no significant difference in other spatial frequencies. In the light adaptation, light adaptation glare, dark adaptation, and yellow blue light filter IQ group, there was no significant difference in other spatial frequencies. There was no significant difference in contrast sensitivity and glare contrast sensitivity between the two groups (P 0.05). Conclusion:. 1. The contrast sensitivity of glare in the Aurium group was better than that in the yellow blue filter IOL group when the spatial frequency was 3cpdl 6cpd, and the difference was statistically significant. 1. The results showed that: 1. Under the condition of dark adaptation to glare, the contrast sensitivity of glare in Aurium group was better than that in yellow blue light filter IOL group. 2. There was no significant difference between the postoperative visual acuity of Aurium and yellow blue light filter IQ IOL group.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：R779.66

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 宋偉瓊;譚淺;夏朝華;;正常人對(duì)比敏感度的特征[J];國際眼科雜志;2007年04期

2 郭佳;宋旭東;;不同瞳孔直徑下非球面及球面人工晶狀體植入術(shù)后高階像差的比較[J];國際眼科雜志;2009年03期

3 胡鵬程;袁非;;人工晶狀體的材料設(shè)計(jì)與視覺質(zhì)量[J];眼科新進(jìn)展;2006年10期

4 陳敏;李一壯;陳暉;;球面與非球面IOL在不同瞳孔直徑時(shí)的對(duì)比敏感度與眩光對(duì)比敏感度[J];眼科新進(jìn)展;2007年12期

5 劉平;石廣森;李志堅(jiān);;人工晶狀體的特點(diǎn)和選擇[J];眼科;2007年02期

6 董U

本文編號(hào)：1562437