進展性缺血性腦卒中危險因素篩選及其預(yù)測評分系統(tǒng)的構(gòu)建
[Abstract]:Objective to screen the risk factors associated with progressive ischemic stroke (Progressive ischemic stroke,PIS) and to construct a predictive scoring system for PIS based on these risk factors so as to provide evidence for its prevention and treatment. Methods 186 patients with acute ischemic stroke were collected from December 2015 to December 2016 in Department of Neurology, Tangshan Workers Hospital. The neurological function was assessed by the National Institutes of America Stroke scale (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,NIHSS) on admission and at the time of disease change. According to whether the NIHSS score increased by 2 points or more within 6 hours to 7 days after the onset of the disease, the neurological function of the patients was assessed by the National Institute of Stroke scale (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale,NIHSS). The patients were divided into progressive ischemic stroke (PIS) group and non progressive ischemic stroke (Non progressive ischemic stroke,NPIS) group. There were 86 cases in PIS group and 100 cases in PIS group. Collect relevant indicators that may affect the patient's condition, including sex, age, past medical history, smoking, alcohol consumption, fever, infection, obesity, body mass index, white blood cell count, fasting blood glucose, fibrinogen, blood lipids, Homocysteine, hypersensitive C-reactive protein, uric acid, blood pressure and blood pressure changes at admission, anemia, carotid plaque, degree of responsible vascular stenosis, infarct location, admission NIHSS score, NIHSS score at the time of disease change, etc. Univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were carried out to screen the risk factors of PIS and establish the Logistic regression equation. Based on the b coefficients of each factor, the prediction scoring system of PIS was constructed by "scoring method". The discriminative power and accuracy of PIS prediction scoring system are evaluated by drawing ROC curve, paired chi-square test and consistency test. Results 1 single factor analysis: alcohol history, fever, infection, body mass index, white blood cell count, triglyceride, hypersensitive C-reactive protein, uric acid, systolic blood pressure, blood pressure after cerebral infarction, moderate to severe stenosis of responsible blood vessel. There were significant differences between PIS group and NPIS group (P0.05); gender, age, history of hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, stroke / TIA history, smoking history, obesity, fasting blood glucose, Fibrinogen, total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, homocysteine, diastolic blood pressure, anemia, carotid plaque, carotid artery unstable plaque, pontine infarction, NIHSS scores at admission were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference (P0.05) in multivariate Logistic regression analysis: body mass index (BMI), alcohol consumption history, blood pressure after infarction, moderate to severe stenosis of responsible vessels, internal capsule hind limb infarction, watershed infarction, fever, and 7 factors were included in Logistic regression model. Is a risk factor for PIS, The odds ratio of each factor (Odds ratio,OR) was 1.300 / 4.02715.852n 4.702n 4.3224.1854.1855 / 11.999.3 to construct a Logistic regression model for predicting PIS: logit Pn-10.035 0.262X1 1.393X2 2.763X3 1.548X4 1.464X5 1.432X6 2.458X7 (note: BMI;X2 indicates drinking history; X3 means blood pressure after infarction; X4 indicates moderate to severe stenosis of the responsible vessel; X4 means the internal of the responsible vessels with moderate to severe stenoses; X4 indicates that the blood pressure after infarction is decreased; X4 indicates that the responsible vessels have moderate to severe stenosis. X6 for watershed area infarction X7 for fever) .4 simplified Logistic regression model. A PIS prediction scoring system with a total score of 10 points and a prediction threshold of 4 points was constructed. The area under the ROC curve was 0.911. The evaluation results were as follows: sensitivity 0.860, specificity 0.920, total coincidence rate 0.889 2, positive likelihood ratio 10.750, negative likelihood ratio 0.152% and Kappa value 0.783. Conclusion 1 body mass index (BMI), alcohol consumption history, blood pressure decrease after cerebral infarction, moderate to severe stenosis of responsible vessels, posterior limb infarction, watershed infarction and fever are the important risk factors of PIS. 2. The application is simple and convenient, and has certain clinical practicability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華北理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:R743.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 吉維忠;張亞清;張豪;吳芬香;李娜;;高海拔地區(qū)進展性腦卒中的相關(guān)因素分析[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2016年17期
2 李利峰;路峰;杜遠生;;血清尿酸和進展性腦梗死關(guān)系探討[J];山西醫(yī)藥雜志;2016年16期
3 王占芬;張學(xué)艷;任秉麗;王莉;;進展性腦卒中危險因素分析及與H型高血壓的相關(guān)性研究[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2016年13期
4 張慶軍;王清華;郭艷;李云霞;靳令經(jīng);聶志余;;ASTRAL評分預(yù)測急性缺血性卒中患者3個月預(yù)后的價值[J];中國卒中雜志;2016年06期
5 趙陽;鄭輯英;;進展性缺血性腦卒中危險因素的臨床研究[J];中西醫(yī)結(jié)合心腦血管病雜志;2016年08期
6 吳壽興;鄭賓;陳燕雄;;強化他汀降脂與傳統(tǒng)降脂治療進展性腦卒中的對比研究[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2016年04期
7 方良;張超;孫中武;;分水嶺腦梗死與顱內(nèi)外血管狹窄的關(guān)系[J];安徽醫(yī)藥;2015年12期
8 郝勁松;;缺血性進展性腦卒中與三種風(fēng)險因子的相關(guān)性研究[J];醫(yī)學(xué)理論與實踐;2015年18期
9 周小丹;趙宏林;包成月;李方睿;楊麗榮;白文婷;馬龍;劉文波;呂利英;佟偉軍;;入院時體溫與急性缺血性腦卒中患者出院結(jié)局的關(guān)系[J];中國老年學(xué)雜志;2015年13期
10 丁俊麗;賀婕;李蘭;何曉丹;銀廣悅;肖麗萍;;進展性缺血性腦卒中的危險因素[J];中國老年學(xué)雜志;2015年11期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條
1 姚濤;缺血性腦卒中急性期超敏C-反應(yīng)蛋白水平變化與早期神經(jīng)功能惡化發(fā)生的相關(guān)性[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2016年
2 賈革;進展性卒中相關(guān)危險因素分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年
3 呂紅霞;國內(nèi)進展性缺血性腦卒中危險因素的Meta分析[D];重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué);2014年
4 童寧;缺血性腦卒中早期神經(jīng)功能惡化相關(guān)危險因素分析[D];山東大學(xué);2013年
5 吳金輝;進展性缺血性腦卒中患者血清鐵蛋白水平及其臨床意義[D];河北聯(lián)合大學(xué);2011年
6 陸卉;進展性腦梗死與穩(wěn)定性腦梗死的臨床對比研究[D];天津醫(yī)科大學(xué);2008年
7 遲魯梅;進展性卒中的臨床及病因分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號:2206622
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/shenjingyixue/2206622.html