本文關(guān)鍵詞： 閃光視覺誘發(fā)電位無創(chuàng)顱內(nèi)壓監(jiān)測技術(shù) 年齡 顱內(nèi)壓 腰椎穿刺　出處：《中國老年學(xué)雜志》2017年17期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的探討閃光視覺誘發(fā)電位無創(chuàng)顱內(nèi)壓監(jiān)測技術(shù)(FVEP-NIICPM)與腰椎穿刺技術(shù)檢測的差異及年齡因素對應(yīng)用FVEP-NIICPM技術(shù)檢測顱內(nèi)壓的影響。方法選取航天中心醫(yī)院神經(jīng)科診斷過程中根據(jù)病情需要行腰椎穿刺術(shù)并簽署知情同意書的患者150例,將年齡分3組:18~40歲為青年組(47例);41~65歲為中年組(56例);66~80歲為老年組(47例)。應(yīng)用FVEP-NIICPM技術(shù)檢測受試對象的顱內(nèi)壓,之后立即行腰椎穿刺并記錄腦脊液初壓。結(jié)果 FVEP-NIICPM檢測值與腰穿顱內(nèi)壓測量值有顯著差異(Z=-3.793,P=0.001);相關(guān)性分析顯示,應(yīng)用FVEP-NIICPM得到的檢測值與腰椎穿刺測得的顱內(nèi)壓值存在正相關(guān)(r=0.867,P=0.001)。不同年齡、性別、疾病診斷種類患者應(yīng)用FVEP-NIICPM技術(shù)與腰椎穿刺技術(shù)測量的顱內(nèi)壓差值均無顯著差異(P0.05)。結(jié)論應(yīng)用FVEP-NIICPM技術(shù)與腰椎穿刺技術(shù)測得的顱內(nèi)壓值不同,有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(P0.05),但二者所測數(shù)值具有顯著正相關(guān)性,且兩種方法所測得顱內(nèi)壓平均值絕對差值僅為5.5 mm H_2O,基本反映顱內(nèi)壓的實際情況不影響對臨床上的指導(dǎo)意義;年齡因素對FVEP-NIICPM技術(shù)測量顱內(nèi)壓無明顯影響。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the difference between FVEP-NIICPMM and lumbar puncture technique in monitoring intracranial pressure with flash visual evoked potential (FVEP-NIICPMP) and the influence of age factors on intracranial pressure by FVEP-NIICPM technique. Methods the neurology department of Aerospace Center Hospital was selected to diagnose the intracranial pressure. According to the needs of the patient's condition, 150 patients underwent lumbar puncture and signed an informed consent form. The patients were divided into 3 groups (n = 47): the age of 18: 40 years old was 18: 40 years old. The intracranial pressure (ICP) of the subjects was measured by FVEP-NIICPM technique, and 47 cases were divided into 4 groups (n = 47): the age group (n = 47) was divided into 4 groups (n = 47). Results there was significant difference between the measured values of FVEP-NIICPM and intracranial pressure of lumbar puncture and the correlation analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the measured value of FVEP-NIICPM and the measured value of intracranial pressure through lumbar puncture. There was a positive correlation between the measured value of FVEP-NIICPM and the value of intracranial pressure measured by lumbar puncture. There was no significant difference in intracranial pressure difference between FVEP-NIICPM technique and lumbar puncture technique. Conclusion the intracranial pressure measured by FVEP-NIICPM technique and lumbar puncture technique is different. There was a statistical difference (P 0.05), but there was a significant positive correlation between the two values, and the absolute difference between the two methods was only 5.5 mm H _ 2O, which basically reflected the actual situation of intracranial pressure and had no effect on the clinical significance. Age had no significant effect on the measurement of intracranial pressure by FVEP-NIICPM.
【作者單位】： 遼寧醫(yī)學(xué)院航天中心醫(yī)院研究生培養(yǎng)基地神經(jīng)內(nèi)科;航天中心醫(yī)院神經(jīng)內(nèi)科;
【基金】：北京市自然科學(xué)基金(No.152027)
【分類號】：R741.04

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 廖旭興;馬廉亭;李俊;楊銘;;腰椎穿刺在自發(fā)性蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔出血病因診斷中的價值探討[J];中國臨床神經(jīng)外科雜志;2009年06期

2 楊爽;;腰椎穿刺置管引流治療原發(fā)性蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔出血療效分析[J];醫(yī)學(xué)理論與實踐;2011年10期

3 韓金濤;傅軍;李選;王昌明;翟國鈞;;動脈瘤性蛛網(wǎng)膜下腔出血栓塞術(shù)后早期連續(xù)腰椎穿刺治療的療效[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(醫(yī)學(xué)版);2013年04期

4 康莊;胡志強;黃輝;戴繽;關(guān)峰;朱廣通;王邵恒;毛貝貝;任樂寧;;非交通性腦積水神經(jīng)內(nèi)鏡術(shù)后腰椎穿刺的重要性[J];中國微侵襲神經(jīng)外科雜志;2011年07期

5 殷志堅;杜天龍;;顱腦疾病的腰椎穿刺與腦脊液檢查[J];中級醫(yī)刊;1981年06期

6 粟秀初;;腰椎穿刺血性腦脊液細胞學(xué)檢查結(jié)果的分析及臨床應(yīng)用價值[J];中國現(xiàn)代神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2008年02期

7 肖詩康，，康珍;103例腰椎穿刺與腦脊液檢驗的臨床評價[J];贛南醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;1994年02期

8 叢志強;;腰椎穿刺和腦脊液檢查臨床應(yīng)用中的幾個問題[J];中國實用內(nèi)科雜志;1995年11期

9 周永軍;持續(xù)腰池腦脊液引流84例療效觀察[J];中國煤炭工業(yè)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2005年07期

10 Ward E ,張娟;兒科腰椎穿刺的應(yīng)用與技術(shù)[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué)(兒科學(xué)分冊);1993年05期

本文編號：1500837