氣管插管麻醉與喉罩麻醉在嬰兒麻醉中的應用效果比較
發(fā)布時間:2019-01-18 16:19
【摘要】:目的探討氣管插管麻醉與喉罩麻醉在嬰兒麻醉中的應用效果。方法在醫(yī)院2014年8月-2015年10月期間診治的行手術(shù)治療的嬰幼兒中抽取88例作研究對象,遵循隨機數(shù)字表法將其分為觀察組和對照組各44例,觀察組應用喉罩麻醉方式,對照組采取氣管插管麻醉方式,比較兩組麻醉效果以及不良反應發(fā)生率。結(jié)果觀察組嬰幼兒插管后的呼末二氧化碳分壓、氣道峰壓分別是(39.2±0.7)mm Hg、(21.5±1.8)cm H2O,不良反應發(fā)生率是6.82%;對照組嬰幼兒插管后的呼末二氧化碳分壓、氣道峰壓分別是(36.3±2.1)mm Hg、(28.9±1.2)cm H2O,不良反應發(fā)生率是20.45%。兩組嬰幼兒插管后呼末二氧化碳分壓、氣道峰壓以及不良反應發(fā)生率的組間比較有統(tǒng)計學差異(P0.05)。結(jié)論與氣管插管麻醉相比,喉罩麻醉在嬰兒麻醉中的應用效果更佳,且患兒不良反應發(fā)生率較低,值得推廣使用。
[Abstract]:Objective To study the effect of tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask anesthesia in infant anesthesia. Methods 88 of the infants who had been treated by the operation of the hospital from August 2014 to October 2015 were selected as the study object. According to the random digital form method, 44 cases were divided into the observation group and the control group. The observation group applied the laryngeal mask anesthesia method, and the control group adopted the tracheal intubation anesthesia method. The effects of two groups of anesthesia and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared. Results The pressure of carbon dioxide at the end of the group and the peak pressure of the airway were respectively (39. 2, 0.7) mm Hg, (21. 5 to 1.8) cm H2O, and the incidence of the adverse reaction was 6.82%. The carbon dioxide partial pressure and the peak pressure of the airway in the control group were (36.3, 2.1) mm Hg, respectively. (28.9% 1. 2) cm H2O, the incidence of adverse reaction was 20.45%. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion The application of laryngeal mask anesthesia in the baby's anesthesia is better than that of the tracheal intubation, and the incidence of adverse reaction of the children is low, and it is worth to be popularized and used.
【作者單位】: 吉安市中心人民醫(yī)院;
【分類號】:R726.1
本文編號:2410888
[Abstract]:Objective To study the effect of tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask anesthesia in infant anesthesia. Methods 88 of the infants who had been treated by the operation of the hospital from August 2014 to October 2015 were selected as the study object. According to the random digital form method, 44 cases were divided into the observation group and the control group. The observation group applied the laryngeal mask anesthesia method, and the control group adopted the tracheal intubation anesthesia method. The effects of two groups of anesthesia and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared. Results The pressure of carbon dioxide at the end of the group and the peak pressure of the airway were respectively (39. 2, 0.7) mm Hg, (21. 5 to 1.8) cm H2O, and the incidence of the adverse reaction was 6.82%. The carbon dioxide partial pressure and the peak pressure of the airway in the control group were (36.3, 2.1) mm Hg, respectively. (28.9% 1. 2) cm H2O, the incidence of adverse reaction was 20.45%. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P0.05). Conclusion The application of laryngeal mask anesthesia in the baby's anesthesia is better than that of the tracheal intubation, and the incidence of adverse reaction of the children is low, and it is worth to be popularized and used.
【作者單位】: 吉安市中心人民醫(yī)院;
【分類號】:R726.1
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 吳靜;吳軼凈;;氣管插管麻醉支氣管鏡下球囊擴張術(shù)的效果觀察[J];臨床肺科雜志;2013年06期
2 李保慶,平育敏,李文起,曹富民,王其彰,嚴嘉順,倪家驤;氣管插管麻醉罕見意外三例報告[J];中華麻醉學雜志;1994年05期
3 張建新 ,于建軍 ,李虹;纖維支氣管鏡在困難氣管插管麻醉中的應用[J];山西醫(yī)藥雜志;2004年04期
4 田曉芳;胡小英;洪蕓;;經(jīng)鼻氣管插管麻醉下行懸雍垂腭咽成形術(shù)的護理[J];中國醫(yī)藥指南;2012年17期
5 薛富善;常喜;王玉坤;趙秀智;王國敬;;氣管插管麻醉嚴重并發(fā)癥七例報告[J];新鄉(xiāng)醫(yī)學院學報;1984年03期
6 王靖;周菊;翟榮君;高愛煜;;分級管理對氣管插管麻醉器具消毒質(zhì)量的影響[J];黑龍江醫(yī)藥;2014年03期
7 王靖;周輝;劉勝英;;氣管插管麻醉器具使用的兩級管理[J];黑龍江醫(yī)學;2014年05期
8 李建鵬;;氣管插管麻醉在嬰兒麻醉中的應用[J];實用中西醫(yī)結(jié)合臨床;2014年08期
9 何偉,董靜;氣管插管麻醉術(shù)后恢復期呼吸道梗阻的原因及對策[J];中國臨床醫(yī)生;2004年07期
10 林沛艾,林楊,楊明華;纖維支氣管鏡在困難氣管插管麻醉中的使用(附60例分析)[J];福建醫(yī)藥雜志;2005年05期
,本文編號:2410888
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/2410888.html
最近更新
教材專著