分析和比較不同麻醉方式下直腸癌術后患者的疼痛情況
發(fā)布時間:2018-05-04 16:55
本文選題:麻醉方式 + 硬膜外復合全身麻醉; 參考:《中國實用醫(yī)藥》2016年26期
【摘要】:目的分析比較不同麻醉方式下直腸癌術后患者的疼痛情況。方法 50例采取直腸癌手術患者,隨機分為A組和B組,各25例。A組使用單純全身麻醉(全麻)方式,B組使用硬膜外復合全麻,對比分析兩組患者術后蘇醒時間、術后疼痛情況、麻醉后監(jiān)測治療室(PACU)停留的時間。結果 A組總有效率為100.0%,B組總有效率為52.0%;比較差異具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。B組術后蘇醒時間為(25.40±4.18)min,A組為(50.40±4.57)min;B組PACU停留的時間為(29.40±4.54)min,A組為(55.40±4.12)min;比較差異均具有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。結論在直腸癌手術中采用硬膜外復合全麻方式,所需藥物較少,且患者術后蘇醒時間較短,有利于緩解患者術后疼痛情況,值得在臨床中推廣。
[Abstract]:Objective to analyze and compare the postoperative pain of rectal cancer under different anesthetic methods. Methods Fifty patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery were randomly divided into two groups: group A (n = 25) and group B (n = 25) were treated with simple general anesthesia (general anesthesia) and group B (n = 25) were treated with epidural combined general anesthesia. Postoperative pain and duration of stay in the treatment room were monitored after anesthesia. Results the total effective rate of group A was 100.0 and the total effective rate of group B was 52.0, and the postoperative recovery time of group A was 25.40 鹵4.18 min and that of group A was 50.40 鹵4.57 min. The total effective rate of group B was 55.40 鹵4.12 min in group B, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion the method of epidural combined with general anesthesia in rectal cancer surgery requires less drugs and shorter recovery time after operation, which is helpful to relieve the postoperative pain and is worth popularizing in clinic.
【作者單位】: 遼寧省人民醫(yī)院麻醉科;
【分類號】:R614;R735.37
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前6條
1 沈曲;李崢;;休斯頓疼痛情況調查表信度和效度的研究[J];中華護理雜志;2006年11期
2 夏桂蘭,姜文珍;癌癥病人疼痛情況調查及對策探討[J];腫瘤防治研究;1999年06期
3 顧為雄;;兒童期腹痛[J];國外醫(yī)學參考資料(兒科學分冊);1974年02期
4 薛敏;孫麗燕;李宇新;;骨科術后患者疼痛情況調查及護理干預[J];臨床醫(yī)藥實踐;2006年10期
5 思健;;趣話唇色與健康[J];晚晴;2010年11期
6 ;[J];;年期
,本文編號:1843834
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/mazuiyixuelunwen/1843834.html
最近更新
教材專著