本文關(guān)鍵詞：農(nóng)村地區(qū)中學(xué)生自行車傷害的干預(yù)研究，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

農(nóng)村地區(qū)中學(xué)生自行車傷害的干預(yù)研究
摘要 目的：探討農(nóng)村地區(qū)中學(xué)生適宜而有效的自行車傷害的干預(yù)方法，以減少 目的 自行車傷害行為的發(fā)生， 進(jìn)而為政府部門制定傷害預(yù)防策略提供科學(xué)依據(jù)。 方法： 方法： 應(yīng)用整群對(duì)照試驗(yàn)的方法，選取兩個(gè)鎮(zhèn)部分中學(xué)初一學(xué)生作為研究對(duì)象，以學(xué)校 為單位分為干預(yù)組和對(duì)照組，在進(jìn)行自行車傷害發(fā)生率與認(rèn)知程度問(wèn)卷調(diào)查后， 給予干預(yù)組學(xué)生多種形式的宣傳

教育的干預(yù)活動(dòng)，持續(xù)一年后，再次對(duì)干預(yù)組和 對(duì)照組進(jìn)行包括自行車傷害發(fā)生率與認(rèn)知程度的調(diào)查。 對(duì)前后兩次調(diào)查結(jié)果加以 。 比較，并運(yùn)用 SPSS17.0 進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析，評(píng)價(jià)自行車傷害干預(yù)效果。結(jié)果：盡管 結(jié)果： 結(jié)果 干預(yù)組與對(duì)照組在干預(yù)前后自行車傷害發(fā)生率之間的差異沒(méi)有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（χ 2 =2.800，P =0.094） ；但進(jìn)一步分析顯示，干預(yù)組在干預(yù)前后學(xué)生自行車傷害發(fā) 生率之間的差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（χ2=8.137，P =0.004） 。對(duì)照組在干預(yù)前后學(xué)生 。干預(yù)前， 自行車傷害發(fā)生率之間的差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（χ2=0.098，P =0.755） 干預(yù)組與對(duì)照組學(xué)生自行車傷害發(fā)生率之間的差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（χ2=2.326，P 。干預(yù)后，干預(yù)組與對(duì)照組學(xué)生自行車傷害發(fā)生率之間的差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué) =0.127） 意義（χ2=13.409，P <0.001） 。干預(yù)組學(xué)生在干預(yù)前后對(duì)于掌握道路交通安全知 識(shí)的差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義，如：從干預(yù)前 56.3％的學(xué)生知道“未滿 12 周歲不能騎 自行車”的規(guī)定，干預(yù)后則提高到 64.1％的學(xué)生知道該規(guī)定，而行為方面未發(fā) 現(xiàn)顯著性改變。結(jié)論：宣傳教育干預(yù)措施對(duì)農(nóng)村中學(xué)生自行車傷害發(fā)生率降低及 結(jié)論： 結(jié)論 道路安全知識(shí)、態(tài)度與認(rèn)知提高方面有一定短期效果，其長(zhǎng)期效果及切實(shí)行之有 效的預(yù)防策略和措施的確定有待于進(jìn)一步的干預(yù)研究。 關(guān)鍵詞：農(nóng)村 關(guān)鍵詞 中學(xué)生 自行車傷害 干預(yù)

Abstract Objective:In this research,we tried to explore suitable and effective interventional methods on bicycle-injuries fit for rural middle school students,in order to decrease the occurance of bicycle-injuries,and then to provide scientific evidence for government establishing strategies. Method:We used the cluster controlled trial in this research.We chose the grade-one students of some middle schools in two towns as the object of study,and then divided them into intervention and comparison groups depending on different schools.After carrying out the questionnaire survey on the incidence rate of bicycle-injuries and on the level of cognition,we afforded various types of propagandist and educational activities,which lasted for a year, to the intervention group.One year later,we carried out the questionnaire survey on the incidence rate of bicycle-injuries and on the level of cognition again on the two groups.At last,we compared the results of two surveys and then conducted the statistical analysis using SPSS 17.0 to evaluate the effect of intervention. Result:There is no statistical significance in the difference of incidence rate of bicycle-injuries between the intervention and comparison groups(χ2=8.137，P

=0.004).But further study showed that there is statistical significance in the difference of incidence rate of bicycle-injuries between before and after affording interventional P activities on students in the intervention group(χ2=8.137， =0.004).Meanwhile,there 2 is no statistical significance in the comparison group(χ =0.098，P =0.755).Before interventional activities,there is no statistical significance in the difference of that P between the intervention and comparison groups(χ2=2.326， =0.127).However,after interventional activities,the difference became statistically significant(χ2=13.409，，P <0.001).Besides,in the intervention group,there is statistical significance in the difference of mastering the knowledge of traffic safety between before and after the interventional activities.For example,before the intervention,about 56.3% of students know the rule that children who are younger than 12 years can never ride a bike.And the proportion raised to 64.1% after the intervention.Unfortunately,there is no obvious changes in the activities. Conclusion:There is some short term effect for the propagandist and educational activities in decreasing the incidence of bicycle-injuries and improving the knowledge, attitude and cognition of traffic safety.But the long term effect of them and the confirm of effective prevention strategy still needs further research. Keywords:rural area;middle school students;bicycle-injuries;prevention



  本文關(guān)鍵詞：農(nóng)村地區(qū)中學(xué)生自行車傷害的干預(yù)研究，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。