本文關鍵詞：農村地區(qū)中學生自行車傷害的干預研究，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

農村地區(qū)中學生自行車傷害的干預研究
摘要 目的：探討農村地區(qū)中學生適宜而有效的自行車傷害的干預方法，以減少 目的 自行車傷害行為的發(fā)生， 進而為政府部門制定傷害預防策略提供科學依據。 方法： 方法： 應用整群對照試驗的方法，選取兩個鎮(zhèn)部分中學初一學生作為研究對象，以學校 為單位分為干預組和對照組，在進行自行車傷害發(fā)生率與認知程度問卷調查后， 給予干預組學生多種形式的宣傳

教育的干預活動，持續(xù)一年后，再次對干預組和 對照組進行包括自行車傷害發(fā)生率與認知程度的調查。 對前后兩次調查結果加以 。 比較，并運用 SPSS17.0 進行統(tǒng)計分析，評價自行車傷害干預效果。結果：盡管 結果： 結果 干預組與對照組在干預前后自行車傷害發(fā)生率之間的差異沒有統(tǒng)計學意義（χ 2 =2.800，P =0.094） ；但進一步分析顯示，干預組在干預前后學生自行車傷害發(fā) 生率之間的差異有統(tǒng)計學意義（χ2=8.137，P =0.004） 。對照組在干預前后學生 。干預前， 自行車傷害發(fā)生率之間的差異無統(tǒng)計學意義（χ2=0.098，P =0.755） 干預組與對照組學生自行車傷害發(fā)生率之間的差異無統(tǒng)計學意義（χ2=2.326，P 。干預后，干預組與對照組學生自行車傷害發(fā)生率之間的差異有統(tǒng)計學 =0.127） 意義（χ2=13.409，P <0.001） 。干預組學生在干預前后對于掌握道路交通安全知 識的差異有統(tǒng)計學意義，如：從干預前 56.3％的學生知道“未滿 12 周歲不能騎 自行車”的規(guī)定，干預后則提高到 64.1％的學生知道該規(guī)定，而行為方面未發(fā) 現(xiàn)顯著性改變。結論：宣傳教育干預措施對農村中學生自行車傷害發(fā)生率降低及 結論： 結論 道路安全知識、態(tài)度與認知提高方面有一定短期效果，其長期效果及切實行之有 效的預防策略和措施的確定有待于進一步的干預研究。 關鍵詞：農村 關鍵詞 中學生 自行車傷害 干預

Abstract Objective:In this research,we tried to explore suitable and effective interventional methods on bicycle-injuries fit for rural middle school students,in order to decrease the occurance of bicycle-injuries,and then to provide scientific evidence for government establishing strategies. Method:We used the cluster controlled trial in this research.We chose the grade-one students of some middle schools in two towns as the object of study,and then divided them into intervention and comparison groups depending on different schools.After carrying out the questionnaire survey on the incidence rate of bicycle-injuries and on the level of cognition,we afforded various types of propagandist and educational activities,which lasted for a year, to the intervention group.One year later,we carried out the questionnaire survey on the incidence rate of bicycle-injuries and on the level of cognition again on the two groups.At last,we compared the results of two surveys and then conducted the statistical analysis using SPSS 17.0 to evaluate the effect of intervention. Result:There is no statistical significance in the difference of incidence rate of bicycle-injuries between the intervention and comparison groups(χ2=8.137，P

=0.004).But further study showed that there is statistical significance in the difference of incidence rate of bicycle-injuries between before and after affording interventional P activities on students in the intervention group(χ2=8.137， =0.004).Meanwhile,there 2 is no statistical significance in the comparison group(χ =0.098，P =0.755).Before interventional activities,there is no statistical significance in the difference of that P between the intervention and comparison groups(χ2=2.326， =0.127).However,after interventional activities,the difference became statistically significant(χ2=13.409，，P <0.001).Besides,in the intervention group,there is statistical significance in the difference of mastering the knowledge of traffic safety between before and after the interventional activities.For example,before the intervention,about 56.3% of students know the rule that children who are younger than 12 years can never ride a bike.And the proportion raised to 64.1% after the intervention.Unfortunately,there is no obvious changes in the activities. Conclusion:There is some short term effect for the propagandist and educational activities in decreasing the incidence of bicycle-injuries and improving the knowledge, attitude and cognition of traffic safety.But the long term effect of them and the confirm of effective prevention strategy still needs further research. Keywords:rural area;middle school students;bicycle-injuries;prevention



  本文關鍵詞：農村地區(qū)中學生自行車傷害的干預研究，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。