本文選題：骨性Ⅱ類 + 骨性Ⅲ類��； 參考：《實(shí)用口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志》2017年05期

【摘要】：目的:研究骨性Ⅱ類和Ⅲ類患者鼻唇角、頦唇角改變對外貌的三維審美影響,并研究正畸醫(yī)生與患者的審美差異。方法:分別選取1名骨性Ⅱ類和Ⅲ類患者,拍攝其正、側(cè)45°像,利用3DMAX軟件按照其面下三分之一形態(tài)制成三維頭部模型后,改變其鼻唇角和頦唇角后分別生成16個(gè)三維頭模,導(dǎo)入iPad后選取30名正畸醫(yī)生和60名正畸患者對隨機(jī)排序的人頭模型進(jìn)行三維審美評分。結(jié)果:對于骨性Ⅱ類患者,2組評分中鼻唇角、頦唇角變化為(+15°,-15°)和原始面貌均得分最低;專業(yè)組評分中(+10°,0)、(+15°,0)得分最高,而非專業(yè)組評分中(+5°,-5°)、(+5°,-10°)得分最高(組間評分,P0.05)。對于骨性Ⅲ類患者,2組評分中鼻唇角、頦唇角變化為(0,+15°)、(0,+10°)和原始面貌均得分最低;專業(yè)組評分中(-5°,+15°)、(-10°,+15°)得分最高,而非專業(yè)組評分中(-10°,+5°)、(-15°,0)得分最高(組間評分,P0.05)。結(jié)論:骨性Ⅱ類和Ⅲ類患者適當(dāng)代償后的面容更受評分者喜歡,但專業(yè)組和非專業(yè)組對于代償?shù)木唧w量的審美有差異。
[Abstract]:Objective: To study the aesthetic difference between orthodontic and orthodontic patients, and to study the aesthetic differences between orthodontic doctors and patients. Methods: 1 patients with orthodontic class II and class III were selected, and their positive and lateral 45 degree images were taken respectively, and the three-dimensional head model was made by 3DMAX software according to the 1/3 form of the surface. 16 three-dimensional head models were generated after the change of the nose and lip angle and the chin and lip angle respectively. After introducing iPad, 30 orthodontic doctors and 60 orthodontic patients were selected for the three-dimensional aesthetic score. Results: for the patients with skeletal Class II, the 2 scores of the nose and lip angle, the mental and lip angle (+15, -15 degree) and the original face were the lowest; the professional group was the lowest. The score (+10, 0), (+15, 0) was the highest, while the score in the non professional group (+5, -5), (+5, -10) was the highest (P0.05). For the patients with class III, the 2 scores of the nose and lip angle, the chin and the lip angle (0, +15), (0, 10 degrees) and the original face were the lowest; the score of the professional group (-5, +15 [degree), -10, +15 degree) was the highest, but the highest score in the professional group (-5, +15 degree), and (-10, +15) was the highest, but the highest score in the professional group (-5, +15 [degree), and (-10, +15)) was the highest, but the highest score in the professional group (-5, +15 [degree), and -10, +15 degrees) was the highest. The score of the non professional group (-10, +5), (-15, 0) was the highest (group score, P0.05). Conclusion: the facial features of the patients of class II and class III were preferred by the raters, but the aesthetic differences between the professional group and the non professional group were different for the specific amount of compensation.

【作者單位】： 重慶醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬口腔醫(yī)院;口腔疾病與生物醫(yī)學(xué)重慶市重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室;重慶市高校市級口腔生物醫(yī)學(xué)工程重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室;
【基金】：重慶市衛(wèi)生局(編號:2011-2-180) 重慶市渝中區(qū)科委(編號:20140128) 2016年重慶高校創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊(duì)建設(shè)計(jì)劃(編號:CXTDG201602006) 中國博士后科學(xué)基金(編號:2013M542248)
【分類號】：R783.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 陳潔;謝靜忠;;正畸治療影響成人鼻唇角變化的多元回歸分析[J];現(xiàn)代口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2010年05期

2 孫娜;楊四維;;鼻唇角與正畸美學(xué)關(guān)系[J];西南軍醫(yī);2013年02期

3 王蕊;;鼻唇角與鼻及上唇傾斜度關(guān)系的評價(jià)[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué).口腔醫(yī)學(xué)分冊;1993年05期

4 張建華;惠雯婷;金作林;;未治療安氏Ⅰ類錯(cuò)鉭軟組織特點(diǎn)及其生長發(fā)育特點(diǎn)的研究[J];臨床口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2013年08期

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 施潔君;朱云山;;成人患者拔牙矯治影響鼻唇角變化的多因素相關(guān)分析[A];第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué)口腔醫(yī)院2004第七屆全國口腔正畸學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2004年

2 周洪;葉湘玉;鄒敏;;正畸治療中唇形態(tài)變化的評價(jià)[A];第五次全國口腔正畸學(xué)術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];1997年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 姚紅英;成都地區(qū)12-14歲安氏Ⅱ～1類錯(cuò)（牙合）兒童鼻唇角的相關(guān)研究[D];四川大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1847383